Motivating Interdependent Teams: Individual Rewards, Shared Rewards, or Something in Between?

Matthew J. Pearsall, Michael S. Christian, Aleksander P J Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary purpose in this study was to extend theory and research regarding the motivational process in teams by examining the effects of hybrid rewards on team performance. Further, to better understand the underlying team level mechanisms, the authors examined whether the hypothesized benefits of hybrid over shared and individual rewards were due to increased information allocation and reduced social loafing. Results from 90 teams working on a command-and-control simulation supported the hypotheses. Hybrid rewards led to higher levels of team performance than did individual and shared rewards; these effects were due to improvements in information allocation and reductions in social loafing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-191
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume95
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Reward
Research

Keywords

  • motivation
  • performance
  • reward structure
  • teams
  • transactive memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Motivating Interdependent Teams : Individual Rewards, Shared Rewards, or Something in Between? / Pearsall, Matthew J.; Christian, Michael S.; Ellis, Aleksander P J.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 95, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 183-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e3ee86ca7d1a475c9fd7ef78157d0a8d,
title = "Motivating Interdependent Teams: Individual Rewards, Shared Rewards, or Something in Between?",
abstract = "The primary purpose in this study was to extend theory and research regarding the motivational process in teams by examining the effects of hybrid rewards on team performance. Further, to better understand the underlying team level mechanisms, the authors examined whether the hypothesized benefits of hybrid over shared and individual rewards were due to increased information allocation and reduced social loafing. Results from 90 teams working on a command-and-control simulation supported the hypotheses. Hybrid rewards led to higher levels of team performance than did individual and shared rewards; these effects were due to improvements in information allocation and reductions in social loafing.",
keywords = "motivation, performance, reward structure, teams, transactive memory",
author = "Pearsall, {Matthew J.} and Christian, {Michael S.} and Ellis, {Aleksander P J}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0017593",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "183--191",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motivating Interdependent Teams

T2 - Individual Rewards, Shared Rewards, or Something in Between?

AU - Pearsall, Matthew J.

AU - Christian, Michael S.

AU - Ellis, Aleksander P J

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - The primary purpose in this study was to extend theory and research regarding the motivational process in teams by examining the effects of hybrid rewards on team performance. Further, to better understand the underlying team level mechanisms, the authors examined whether the hypothesized benefits of hybrid over shared and individual rewards were due to increased information allocation and reduced social loafing. Results from 90 teams working on a command-and-control simulation supported the hypotheses. Hybrid rewards led to higher levels of team performance than did individual and shared rewards; these effects were due to improvements in information allocation and reductions in social loafing.

AB - The primary purpose in this study was to extend theory and research regarding the motivational process in teams by examining the effects of hybrid rewards on team performance. Further, to better understand the underlying team level mechanisms, the authors examined whether the hypothesized benefits of hybrid over shared and individual rewards were due to increased information allocation and reduced social loafing. Results from 90 teams working on a command-and-control simulation supported the hypotheses. Hybrid rewards led to higher levels of team performance than did individual and shared rewards; these effects were due to improvements in information allocation and reductions in social loafing.

KW - motivation

KW - performance

KW - reward structure

KW - teams

KW - transactive memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76449091875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76449091875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0017593

DO - 10.1037/a0017593

M3 - Article

C2 - 20085415

AN - SCOPUS:76449091875

VL - 95

SP - 183

EP - 191

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 1

ER -