MR imaging for acute nontraumatic abdominopelvic pain: Rationale and practical considerations

Michael Lubarsky, Bobby T Kalb, Puneet Sharma, Samuel M Keim, Diego R Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Medical imaging is becoming an increasingly vital component of patient care in the emergency department. Computed tomography has been the diagnostic imaging method of choice for emergency department patients with acute abdominopelvic pain; however, the use of ionizing radiation and the potential need for exogenous contrast material adversely affect patient safety and work flow efficiency, respectively. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging holds promise as an alternative for the evaluation of acute abdominopelvic pain. Critical causes of abdominopelvic pain may be detected with MR imaging without exogenous contrast material. MR imaging is sensitive for depicting tissue or fluid changes related to inflammation, a common process in causes of acute abdominopelvic pain. Fat suppression allows the detection of abnormal signal caused by inflamed tissue. MR imaging has proved sensitive in the detection of acute inflammatory diseases of the gallbladder and bile ducts, liver, pancreas, kidneys, collecting system, bowel, and pelvic soft tissues. Moreover, MR imaging without exogenous contrast material may be safely used in pregnant patients. Evolving roles for emergency department MR imaging include the assessment of vascular disease (including thromboembolic disease) and right upper quadrant pain. Emergency department MR imaging currently has limited availability, and its continued use will require further education regarding operation and image interpretation as well as further validation of cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless, current understanding of the diagnostic utility of this imaging method warrants continued study and the increased use of MR imaging in the evaluation of emergency department patients with acute abdominopelvic pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)313-337
Number of pages25
JournalRadiographics
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pain
Acute Pain
Hospital Emergency Service
Diagnostic Imaging
Contrast Media
Workflow
Acute Disease
Patient Safety
Ionizing Radiation
Bile Ducts
Gallbladder
Vascular Diseases
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Pancreas
Patient Care
Fats
Tomography
Inflammation
Kidney

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MR imaging for acute nontraumatic abdominopelvic pain : Rationale and practical considerations. / Lubarsky, Michael; Kalb, Bobby T; Sharma, Puneet; Keim, Samuel M; Martin, Diego R.

In: Radiographics, Vol. 33, No. 2, 03.2013, p. 313-337.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{533aa6217505467e9f02fe1d1e0aa3ed,
title = "MR imaging for acute nontraumatic abdominopelvic pain: Rationale and practical considerations",
abstract = "Medical imaging is becoming an increasingly vital component of patient care in the emergency department. Computed tomography has been the diagnostic imaging method of choice for emergency department patients with acute abdominopelvic pain; however, the use of ionizing radiation and the potential need for exogenous contrast material adversely affect patient safety and work flow efficiency, respectively. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging holds promise as an alternative for the evaluation of acute abdominopelvic pain. Critical causes of abdominopelvic pain may be detected with MR imaging without exogenous contrast material. MR imaging is sensitive for depicting tissue or fluid changes related to inflammation, a common process in causes of acute abdominopelvic pain. Fat suppression allows the detection of abnormal signal caused by inflamed tissue. MR imaging has proved sensitive in the detection of acute inflammatory diseases of the gallbladder and bile ducts, liver, pancreas, kidneys, collecting system, bowel, and pelvic soft tissues. Moreover, MR imaging without exogenous contrast material may be safely used in pregnant patients. Evolving roles for emergency department MR imaging include the assessment of vascular disease (including thromboembolic disease) and right upper quadrant pain. Emergency department MR imaging currently has limited availability, and its continued use will require further education regarding operation and image interpretation as well as further validation of cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless, current understanding of the diagnostic utility of this imaging method warrants continued study and the increased use of MR imaging in the evaluation of emergency department patients with acute abdominopelvic pain.",
author = "Michael Lubarsky and Kalb, {Bobby T} and Puneet Sharma and Keim, {Samuel M} and Martin, {Diego R}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1148/rg.332125116",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "313--337",
journal = "Radiographics",
issn = "0271-5333",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MR imaging for acute nontraumatic abdominopelvic pain

T2 - Rationale and practical considerations

AU - Lubarsky, Michael

AU - Kalb, Bobby T

AU - Sharma, Puneet

AU - Keim, Samuel M

AU - Martin, Diego R

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Medical imaging is becoming an increasingly vital component of patient care in the emergency department. Computed tomography has been the diagnostic imaging method of choice for emergency department patients with acute abdominopelvic pain; however, the use of ionizing radiation and the potential need for exogenous contrast material adversely affect patient safety and work flow efficiency, respectively. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging holds promise as an alternative for the evaluation of acute abdominopelvic pain. Critical causes of abdominopelvic pain may be detected with MR imaging without exogenous contrast material. MR imaging is sensitive for depicting tissue or fluid changes related to inflammation, a common process in causes of acute abdominopelvic pain. Fat suppression allows the detection of abnormal signal caused by inflamed tissue. MR imaging has proved sensitive in the detection of acute inflammatory diseases of the gallbladder and bile ducts, liver, pancreas, kidneys, collecting system, bowel, and pelvic soft tissues. Moreover, MR imaging without exogenous contrast material may be safely used in pregnant patients. Evolving roles for emergency department MR imaging include the assessment of vascular disease (including thromboembolic disease) and right upper quadrant pain. Emergency department MR imaging currently has limited availability, and its continued use will require further education regarding operation and image interpretation as well as further validation of cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless, current understanding of the diagnostic utility of this imaging method warrants continued study and the increased use of MR imaging in the evaluation of emergency department patients with acute abdominopelvic pain.

AB - Medical imaging is becoming an increasingly vital component of patient care in the emergency department. Computed tomography has been the diagnostic imaging method of choice for emergency department patients with acute abdominopelvic pain; however, the use of ionizing radiation and the potential need for exogenous contrast material adversely affect patient safety and work flow efficiency, respectively. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging holds promise as an alternative for the evaluation of acute abdominopelvic pain. Critical causes of abdominopelvic pain may be detected with MR imaging without exogenous contrast material. MR imaging is sensitive for depicting tissue or fluid changes related to inflammation, a common process in causes of acute abdominopelvic pain. Fat suppression allows the detection of abnormal signal caused by inflamed tissue. MR imaging has proved sensitive in the detection of acute inflammatory diseases of the gallbladder and bile ducts, liver, pancreas, kidneys, collecting system, bowel, and pelvic soft tissues. Moreover, MR imaging without exogenous contrast material may be safely used in pregnant patients. Evolving roles for emergency department MR imaging include the assessment of vascular disease (including thromboembolic disease) and right upper quadrant pain. Emergency department MR imaging currently has limited availability, and its continued use will require further education regarding operation and image interpretation as well as further validation of cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless, current understanding of the diagnostic utility of this imaging method warrants continued study and the increased use of MR imaging in the evaluation of emergency department patients with acute abdominopelvic pain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875144917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875144917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/rg.332125116

DO - 10.1148/rg.332125116

M3 - Article

C2 - 23479698

AN - SCOPUS:84875144917

VL - 33

SP - 313

EP - 337

JO - Radiographics

JF - Radiographics

SN - 0271-5333

IS - 2

ER -