Multi-country Willingness to Pay for Transborder Migratory Species Conservation

A Case Study of Northern Pintails

Michelle A. Haefele, John B. Loomis, Aaron M. Lien, James A. Dubovsky, Robert W. Merideth, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Ta Ken Huang, Brady J. Mattsson, Darius J. Semmens, Wayne E. Thogmartin, Ruscena Wiederholt, Jay E. Diffendorfer, Laura López-Hoffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Using contingent valuation, we estimated willingness to pay (WTP) in Canada, Mexico, and the United States to protect habitat for Northern Pintails (hereafter pintails), a migratory waterfowl species that provides benefits to and requires habitat in the three countries. Our study contributes to research on spatial subsidies by measuring the value of migratory species habitat. While WTP to protect pintail habitat is highest in the household's own country, there also is substantial WTP to protect pintail habitat in the other two countries. Canadian households’ annual WTP is US$12 (all dollar values are in 2016 US dollars) to stabilize the pintail population in Canada, US$4 in Mexico, and US$5 in the U.S. Mexican households would pay US$8 in Mexico, US$5 in the U.S., and US$5 in Canada. U.S. households would pay US$28 in the U.S., US$18 in Canada, and US$16 in Mexico. WTP is statistically significantly higher in all three countries to increase the pintail population. WTP as a percentage of household income is statistically significantly higher for respondents in Mexico. WTP is logically related to explanatory variables such as respondent income, interest in hunting waterfowl, and financial support of wildlife conservation organizations. This study has important implications for conducting economic analyses of habitat issues of transboundary migratory species’ conservation and to more effectively and equitably achieve conservation goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)321-331
Number of pages11
JournalEcological Economics
Volume157
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

migratory species
species conservation
willingness to pay
habitat
waterfowl
contingent valuation
household income
Willingness-to-pay
Species conservation
nature conservation
hunting
income
household
economics

Keywords

  • Canada
  • Contingent valuation
  • Ducks
  • Habitat
  • Mexico
  • Pintails
  • United States
  • Waterfowl
  • Willingness to pay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Multi-country Willingness to Pay for Transborder Migratory Species Conservation : A Case Study of Northern Pintails. / Haefele, Michelle A.; Loomis, John B.; Lien, Aaron M.; Dubovsky, James A.; Merideth, Robert W.; Bagstad, Kenneth J.; Huang, Ta Ken; Mattsson, Brady J.; Semmens, Darius J.; Thogmartin, Wayne E.; Wiederholt, Ruscena; Diffendorfer, Jay E.; López-Hoffman, Laura.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 157, 01.03.2019, p. 321-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haefele, MA, Loomis, JB, Lien, AM, Dubovsky, JA, Merideth, RW, Bagstad, KJ, Huang, TK, Mattsson, BJ, Semmens, DJ, Thogmartin, WE, Wiederholt, R, Diffendorfer, JE & López-Hoffman, L 2019, 'Multi-country Willingness to Pay for Transborder Migratory Species Conservation: A Case Study of Northern Pintails', Ecological Economics, vol. 157, pp. 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.024
Haefele, Michelle A. ; Loomis, John B. ; Lien, Aaron M. ; Dubovsky, James A. ; Merideth, Robert W. ; Bagstad, Kenneth J. ; Huang, Ta Ken ; Mattsson, Brady J. ; Semmens, Darius J. ; Thogmartin, Wayne E. ; Wiederholt, Ruscena ; Diffendorfer, Jay E. ; López-Hoffman, Laura. / Multi-country Willingness to Pay for Transborder Migratory Species Conservation : A Case Study of Northern Pintails. In: Ecological Economics. 2019 ; Vol. 157. pp. 321-331.
@article{6460884dc73d4da4930ac1849f21b88f,
title = "Multi-country Willingness to Pay for Transborder Migratory Species Conservation: A Case Study of Northern Pintails",
abstract = "Using contingent valuation, we estimated willingness to pay (WTP) in Canada, Mexico, and the United States to protect habitat for Northern Pintails (hereafter pintails), a migratory waterfowl species that provides benefits to and requires habitat in the three countries. Our study contributes to research on spatial subsidies by measuring the value of migratory species habitat. While WTP to protect pintail habitat is highest in the household's own country, there also is substantial WTP to protect pintail habitat in the other two countries. Canadian households’ annual WTP is US$12 (all dollar values are in 2016 US dollars) to stabilize the pintail population in Canada, US$4 in Mexico, and US$5 in the U.S. Mexican households would pay US$8 in Mexico, US$5 in the U.S., and US$5 in Canada. U.S. households would pay US$28 in the U.S., US$18 in Canada, and US$16 in Mexico. WTP is statistically significantly higher in all three countries to increase the pintail population. WTP as a percentage of household income is statistically significantly higher for respondents in Mexico. WTP is logically related to explanatory variables such as respondent income, interest in hunting waterfowl, and financial support of wildlife conservation organizations. This study has important implications for conducting economic analyses of habitat issues of transboundary migratory species’ conservation and to more effectively and equitably achieve conservation goals.",
keywords = "Canada, Contingent valuation, Ducks, Habitat, Mexico, Pintails, United States, Waterfowl, Willingness to pay",
author = "Haefele, {Michelle A.} and Loomis, {John B.} and Lien, {Aaron M.} and Dubovsky, {James A.} and Merideth, {Robert W.} and Bagstad, {Kenneth J.} and Huang, {Ta Ken} and Mattsson, {Brady J.} and Semmens, {Darius J.} and Thogmartin, {Wayne E.} and Ruscena Wiederholt and Diffendorfer, {Jay E.} and Laura L{\'o}pez-Hoffman",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "157",
pages = "321--331",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-country Willingness to Pay for Transborder Migratory Species Conservation

T2 - A Case Study of Northern Pintails

AU - Haefele, Michelle A.

AU - Loomis, John B.

AU - Lien, Aaron M.

AU - Dubovsky, James A.

AU - Merideth, Robert W.

AU - Bagstad, Kenneth J.

AU - Huang, Ta Ken

AU - Mattsson, Brady J.

AU - Semmens, Darius J.

AU - Thogmartin, Wayne E.

AU - Wiederholt, Ruscena

AU - Diffendorfer, Jay E.

AU - López-Hoffman, Laura

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Using contingent valuation, we estimated willingness to pay (WTP) in Canada, Mexico, and the United States to protect habitat for Northern Pintails (hereafter pintails), a migratory waterfowl species that provides benefits to and requires habitat in the three countries. Our study contributes to research on spatial subsidies by measuring the value of migratory species habitat. While WTP to protect pintail habitat is highest in the household's own country, there also is substantial WTP to protect pintail habitat in the other two countries. Canadian households’ annual WTP is US$12 (all dollar values are in 2016 US dollars) to stabilize the pintail population in Canada, US$4 in Mexico, and US$5 in the U.S. Mexican households would pay US$8 in Mexico, US$5 in the U.S., and US$5 in Canada. U.S. households would pay US$28 in the U.S., US$18 in Canada, and US$16 in Mexico. WTP is statistically significantly higher in all three countries to increase the pintail population. WTP as a percentage of household income is statistically significantly higher for respondents in Mexico. WTP is logically related to explanatory variables such as respondent income, interest in hunting waterfowl, and financial support of wildlife conservation organizations. This study has important implications for conducting economic analyses of habitat issues of transboundary migratory species’ conservation and to more effectively and equitably achieve conservation goals.

AB - Using contingent valuation, we estimated willingness to pay (WTP) in Canada, Mexico, and the United States to protect habitat for Northern Pintails (hereafter pintails), a migratory waterfowl species that provides benefits to and requires habitat in the three countries. Our study contributes to research on spatial subsidies by measuring the value of migratory species habitat. While WTP to protect pintail habitat is highest in the household's own country, there also is substantial WTP to protect pintail habitat in the other two countries. Canadian households’ annual WTP is US$12 (all dollar values are in 2016 US dollars) to stabilize the pintail population in Canada, US$4 in Mexico, and US$5 in the U.S. Mexican households would pay US$8 in Mexico, US$5 in the U.S., and US$5 in Canada. U.S. households would pay US$28 in the U.S., US$18 in Canada, and US$16 in Mexico. WTP is statistically significantly higher in all three countries to increase the pintail population. WTP as a percentage of household income is statistically significantly higher for respondents in Mexico. WTP is logically related to explanatory variables such as respondent income, interest in hunting waterfowl, and financial support of wildlife conservation organizations. This study has important implications for conducting economic analyses of habitat issues of transboundary migratory species’ conservation and to more effectively and equitably achieve conservation goals.

KW - Canada

KW - Contingent valuation

KW - Ducks

KW - Habitat

KW - Mexico

KW - Pintails

KW - United States

KW - Waterfowl

KW - Willingness to pay

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058211973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058211973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.024

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.024

M3 - Article

VL - 157

SP - 321

EP - 331

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -