Multicriterion analysis of groundwater contamination management

Nabil Shafike, Lucien Duckstein, Thomas Maddock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multicriterion decision making (MCDM) techniques were used to analyze a groundwater contamination management problem from the viewpoint of conflicting multiple objectives. The groundwater management model was used to find a compromise strategy for trading off fresh water supply, containment of the waste, and total pumping cost in a hypothetical confined aquifer affected by previous waste disposal action. A groundwater flow model was used to formulate the hydraulic constraints. A linear system model was used to describe drawdown and velocity as functions of the decision variables which were pumping rates. The model determines the pumping location and rates. A modified ε-constraint method was used to generate the set of nondominated solutions which were the alternative compromise strategies. Three different MCDM techniques, Compromise programming (CP), ELECTRA II and MCQA II, were used to select a ``satisficing'' alternative. Analysis of the results showed that, although these techniques follow different principles, the same preferred strategies were reached. Also, it was noticed that maintaining high groundwater velocities is expensive and difficult. In order to meet a two year target date, large amounts of water had to be pumped. Therefore, rapid restoration results in large pumping volumes and high costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-43
Number of pages11
JournalWater Resources Bulletin
Volume28
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

environmental pollution
compromise
pumping
groundwater
management
decision making
waste disposal
system model
costs
linear model
restoration
water management
confined aquifer
containment
programming
drawdown
cost
groundwater flow
water
water supply

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Law

Cite this

Multicriterion analysis of groundwater contamination management. / Shafike, Nabil; Duckstein, Lucien; Maddock, Thomas.

In: Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.1992, p. 33-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shafike, Nabil ; Duckstein, Lucien ; Maddock, Thomas. / Multicriterion analysis of groundwater contamination management. In: Water Resources Bulletin. 1992 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 33-43.
@article{59ff74cf42174da4baeddd268267abb7,
title = "Multicriterion analysis of groundwater contamination management",
abstract = "Multicriterion decision making (MCDM) techniques were used to analyze a groundwater contamination management problem from the viewpoint of conflicting multiple objectives. The groundwater management model was used to find a compromise strategy for trading off fresh water supply, containment of the waste, and total pumping cost in a hypothetical confined aquifer affected by previous waste disposal action. A groundwater flow model was used to formulate the hydraulic constraints. A linear system model was used to describe drawdown and velocity as functions of the decision variables which were pumping rates. The model determines the pumping location and rates. A modified ε-constraint method was used to generate the set of nondominated solutions which were the alternative compromise strategies. Three different MCDM techniques, Compromise programming (CP), ELECTRA II and MCQA II, were used to select a ``satisficing'' alternative. Analysis of the results showed that, although these techniques follow different principles, the same preferred strategies were reached. Also, it was noticed that maintaining high groundwater velocities is expensive and difficult. In order to meet a two year target date, large amounts of water had to be pumped. Therefore, rapid restoration results in large pumping volumes and high costs.",
author = "Nabil Shafike and Lucien Duckstein and Thomas Maddock",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "33--43",
journal = "Journal of the American Water Resources Association",
issn = "1093-474X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicriterion analysis of groundwater contamination management

AU - Shafike, Nabil

AU - Duckstein, Lucien

AU - Maddock, Thomas

PY - 1992/1

Y1 - 1992/1

N2 - Multicriterion decision making (MCDM) techniques were used to analyze a groundwater contamination management problem from the viewpoint of conflicting multiple objectives. The groundwater management model was used to find a compromise strategy for trading off fresh water supply, containment of the waste, and total pumping cost in a hypothetical confined aquifer affected by previous waste disposal action. A groundwater flow model was used to formulate the hydraulic constraints. A linear system model was used to describe drawdown and velocity as functions of the decision variables which were pumping rates. The model determines the pumping location and rates. A modified ε-constraint method was used to generate the set of nondominated solutions which were the alternative compromise strategies. Three different MCDM techniques, Compromise programming (CP), ELECTRA II and MCQA II, were used to select a ``satisficing'' alternative. Analysis of the results showed that, although these techniques follow different principles, the same preferred strategies were reached. Also, it was noticed that maintaining high groundwater velocities is expensive and difficult. In order to meet a two year target date, large amounts of water had to be pumped. Therefore, rapid restoration results in large pumping volumes and high costs.

AB - Multicriterion decision making (MCDM) techniques were used to analyze a groundwater contamination management problem from the viewpoint of conflicting multiple objectives. The groundwater management model was used to find a compromise strategy for trading off fresh water supply, containment of the waste, and total pumping cost in a hypothetical confined aquifer affected by previous waste disposal action. A groundwater flow model was used to formulate the hydraulic constraints. A linear system model was used to describe drawdown and velocity as functions of the decision variables which were pumping rates. The model determines the pumping location and rates. A modified ε-constraint method was used to generate the set of nondominated solutions which were the alternative compromise strategies. Three different MCDM techniques, Compromise programming (CP), ELECTRA II and MCQA II, were used to select a ``satisficing'' alternative. Analysis of the results showed that, although these techniques follow different principles, the same preferred strategies were reached. Also, it was noticed that maintaining high groundwater velocities is expensive and difficult. In order to meet a two year target date, large amounts of water had to be pumped. Therefore, rapid restoration results in large pumping volumes and high costs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026745281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026745281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026745281

VL - 28

SP - 33

EP - 43

JO - Journal of the American Water Resources Association

JF - Journal of the American Water Resources Association

SN - 1093-474X

IS - 1

ER -