Multiple memory systems: What and why

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence from a variety of domains converges on the view that there are multiple learning/memory systems, but there is no clear understanding of what these systems are, and why they should exist. I review an hypothesis about multiple memory systems postulated by O'Keefe and Nadel (The hippocampus as a cognitive map, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), in particular our assertions about the nature of two kinds of systems (the locale and taxon systems), and what differentiates them from each other. I concentrate on our assumption that systems differ in terms of the type of information they process, rather than in terms of the temporal duration over which they function. Our "content-driven" dichotomy is contrasted with several other current views, none of which appears to explain extant data, or provides clear predictions about when one or the other kind of system would be engaged. Finally, I briefly consider why such distinct systems might have evolved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume4
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Hippocampus
Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Multiple memory systems : What and why. / Nadel, Lynn.

In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1992.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0955001831c74ee1a221995add852e80,
title = "Multiple memory systems: What and why",
abstract = "Evidence from a variety of domains converges on the view that there are multiple learning/memory systems, but there is no clear understanding of what these systems are, and why they should exist. I review an hypothesis about multiple memory systems postulated by O'Keefe and Nadel (The hippocampus as a cognitive map, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), in particular our assertions about the nature of two kinds of systems (the locale and taxon systems), and what differentiates them from each other. I concentrate on our assumption that systems differ in terms of the type of information they process, rather than in terms of the temporal duration over which they function. Our {"}content-driven{"} dichotomy is contrasted with several other current views, none of which appears to explain extant data, or provides clear predictions about when one or the other kind of system would be engaged. Finally, I briefly consider why such distinct systems might have evolved.",
author = "Lynn Nadel",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "0898-929X",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple memory systems

T2 - What and why

AU - Nadel, Lynn

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Evidence from a variety of domains converges on the view that there are multiple learning/memory systems, but there is no clear understanding of what these systems are, and why they should exist. I review an hypothesis about multiple memory systems postulated by O'Keefe and Nadel (The hippocampus as a cognitive map, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), in particular our assertions about the nature of two kinds of systems (the locale and taxon systems), and what differentiates them from each other. I concentrate on our assumption that systems differ in terms of the type of information they process, rather than in terms of the temporal duration over which they function. Our "content-driven" dichotomy is contrasted with several other current views, none of which appears to explain extant data, or provides clear predictions about when one or the other kind of system would be engaged. Finally, I briefly consider why such distinct systems might have evolved.

AB - Evidence from a variety of domains converges on the view that there are multiple learning/memory systems, but there is no clear understanding of what these systems are, and why they should exist. I review an hypothesis about multiple memory systems postulated by O'Keefe and Nadel (The hippocampus as a cognitive map, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), in particular our assertions about the nature of two kinds of systems (the locale and taxon systems), and what differentiates them from each other. I concentrate on our assumption that systems differ in terms of the type of information they process, rather than in terms of the temporal duration over which they function. Our "content-driven" dichotomy is contrasted with several other current views, none of which appears to explain extant data, or provides clear predictions about when one or the other kind of system would be engaged. Finally, I briefly consider why such distinct systems might have evolved.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026766153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026766153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026766153

VL - 4

JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 0898-929X

IS - 3

ER -