Multiple memory systems: What and why

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

81 Scopus citations

Abstract

Evidence from a variety of domains converges on the view that there are multiple learning/memory systems, but there is no clear understanding of what these systems are, and why they should exist. I review an hypothesis about multiple memory systems postulated by O'Keefe and Nadel (The hippocampus as a cognitive map, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), in particular our assertions about the nature of two kinds of systems (the locale and taxon systems), and what differentiates them from each other. I concentrate on our assumption that systems differ in terms of the type of information they process, rather than in terms of the temporal duration over which they function. Our 'content-driven' dichotomy is contrasted with several other current views, none of which appears to explain extant data, or provides clear predictions about when one or the other kind of system would be engaged. Finally, I briefly consider why such distinct systems might have evolved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-188
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of cognitive neuroscience
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple memory systems: What and why'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this