Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction: Evidence for the complementary hypothesis

Edgar E. Kausel, Jerel E Slaughter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the interactionist perspective has been widely studied in organizational attractiveness, there is no research comparing the explanatory power of the complementary and supplementary hypotheses in predicting attraction. The authors test these perspectives in the context of the instrumental-symbolic framework. The authors also examine whether the use of narrow personality facets, such as Trust (under the Big Five trait Agreeableness), Assertiveness (under Extraversion), and Imagination (under Openness to Experience) enhances the prediction of attraction. Job seekers (N=220) provided self-ratings of personality, ratings of organizational traits, and their level of attraction to a potential future employer. Results supported predictions based on complementarity, suggesting that organizations adopting a recruiting strategy based on similarity in personality may not succeed in attracting their most preferred candidates. The findings also suggested that narrow facets are useful in predicting attraction, providing further evidence for the predictive benefits of narrow personality traits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-14
Number of pages12
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume114
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Personality
Assertiveness
Imagination
Organizational attraction
Personality traits
Attraction
Research
Prediction
Rating

Keywords

  • Applicant attraction
  • Assertiveness
  • Big Five
  • Imagination
  • Interactionist perspective
  • Narrow traits
  • Organization personality
  • Person-organization fit
  • Recruitment
  • Trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{a75724c7c24d4ba58174ccbb077763fd,
title = "Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction: Evidence for the complementary hypothesis",
abstract = "Although the interactionist perspective has been widely studied in organizational attractiveness, there is no research comparing the explanatory power of the complementary and supplementary hypotheses in predicting attraction. The authors test these perspectives in the context of the instrumental-symbolic framework. The authors also examine whether the use of narrow personality facets, such as Trust (under the Big Five trait Agreeableness), Assertiveness (under Extraversion), and Imagination (under Openness to Experience) enhances the prediction of attraction. Job seekers (N=220) provided self-ratings of personality, ratings of organizational traits, and their level of attraction to a potential future employer. Results supported predictions based on complementarity, suggesting that organizations adopting a recruiting strategy based on similarity in personality may not succeed in attracting their most preferred candidates. The findings also suggested that narrow facets are useful in predicting attraction, providing further evidence for the predictive benefits of narrow personality traits.",
keywords = "Applicant attraction, Assertiveness, Big Five, Imagination, Interactionist perspective, Narrow traits, Organization personality, Person-organization fit, Recruitment, Trust",
author = "Kausel, {Edgar E.} and Slaughter, {Jerel E}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "3--14",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction

T2 - Evidence for the complementary hypothesis

AU - Kausel, Edgar E.

AU - Slaughter, Jerel E

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Although the interactionist perspective has been widely studied in organizational attractiveness, there is no research comparing the explanatory power of the complementary and supplementary hypotheses in predicting attraction. The authors test these perspectives in the context of the instrumental-symbolic framework. The authors also examine whether the use of narrow personality facets, such as Trust (under the Big Five trait Agreeableness), Assertiveness (under Extraversion), and Imagination (under Openness to Experience) enhances the prediction of attraction. Job seekers (N=220) provided self-ratings of personality, ratings of organizational traits, and their level of attraction to a potential future employer. Results supported predictions based on complementarity, suggesting that organizations adopting a recruiting strategy based on similarity in personality may not succeed in attracting their most preferred candidates. The findings also suggested that narrow facets are useful in predicting attraction, providing further evidence for the predictive benefits of narrow personality traits.

AB - Although the interactionist perspective has been widely studied in organizational attractiveness, there is no research comparing the explanatory power of the complementary and supplementary hypotheses in predicting attraction. The authors test these perspectives in the context of the instrumental-symbolic framework. The authors also examine whether the use of narrow personality facets, such as Trust (under the Big Five trait Agreeableness), Assertiveness (under Extraversion), and Imagination (under Openness to Experience) enhances the prediction of attraction. Job seekers (N=220) provided self-ratings of personality, ratings of organizational traits, and their level of attraction to a potential future employer. Results supported predictions based on complementarity, suggesting that organizations adopting a recruiting strategy based on similarity in personality may not succeed in attracting their most preferred candidates. The findings also suggested that narrow facets are useful in predicting attraction, providing further evidence for the predictive benefits of narrow personality traits.

KW - Applicant attraction

KW - Assertiveness

KW - Big Five

KW - Imagination

KW - Interactionist perspective

KW - Narrow traits

KW - Organization personality

KW - Person-organization fit

KW - Recruitment

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449304295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449304295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78449304295

VL - 114

SP - 3

EP - 14

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 1

ER -