Native Americans and the Practice of Archaeology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Archaeologists are in the midst of restructuring their relationship with Native Americans. The legal, political, social, and intellectual ramifications of this process are reviewed to examine the fundamental changes occurring in the way archaeology is conducted in the Americas. Much of the impetus for this change resulted from the criticism of archaeology by Native Americans, which led to passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA). NAGPRA has indelibly changed how archaeologists will work in the United States. The issues raised by Native Americans about why and how archaeological research is conducted, however, go beyond NAGPRA to the paradigmatic basis of archaeology. Archaeologists will have new opportunities available to them if they work in partnership with Native Americans in studying the rich archaeological record in the Americas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-79
Number of pages17
JournalAnnual Review of Anthropology
Volume25
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

remigration
archaeology
act
restructuring
criticism
Native Americans
Archaeology
Repatriation
Archaeologists

Keywords

  • American Indians
  • Cultural resources management
  • Ethics
  • Repatriation
  • Theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Cite this

Native Americans and the Practice of Archaeology. / Ferguson, Thomas J.

In: Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1996, p. 63-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8b26120a3b224f36a1ff72b263996919,
title = "Native Americans and the Practice of Archaeology",
abstract = "Archaeologists are in the midst of restructuring their relationship with Native Americans. The legal, political, social, and intellectual ramifications of this process are reviewed to examine the fundamental changes occurring in the way archaeology is conducted in the Americas. Much of the impetus for this change resulted from the criticism of archaeology by Native Americans, which led to passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA). NAGPRA has indelibly changed how archaeologists will work in the United States. The issues raised by Native Americans about why and how archaeological research is conducted, however, go beyond NAGPRA to the paradigmatic basis of archaeology. Archaeologists will have new opportunities available to them if they work in partnership with Native Americans in studying the rich archaeological record in the Americas.",
keywords = "American Indians, Cultural resources management, Ethics, Repatriation, Theory",
author = "Ferguson, {Thomas J}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "63--79",
journal = "Annual Review of Anthropology",
issn = "0084-6570",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Native Americans and the Practice of Archaeology

AU - Ferguson, Thomas J

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Archaeologists are in the midst of restructuring their relationship with Native Americans. The legal, political, social, and intellectual ramifications of this process are reviewed to examine the fundamental changes occurring in the way archaeology is conducted in the Americas. Much of the impetus for this change resulted from the criticism of archaeology by Native Americans, which led to passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA). NAGPRA has indelibly changed how archaeologists will work in the United States. The issues raised by Native Americans about why and how archaeological research is conducted, however, go beyond NAGPRA to the paradigmatic basis of archaeology. Archaeologists will have new opportunities available to them if they work in partnership with Native Americans in studying the rich archaeological record in the Americas.

AB - Archaeologists are in the midst of restructuring their relationship with Native Americans. The legal, political, social, and intellectual ramifications of this process are reviewed to examine the fundamental changes occurring in the way archaeology is conducted in the Americas. Much of the impetus for this change resulted from the criticism of archaeology by Native Americans, which led to passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA). NAGPRA has indelibly changed how archaeologists will work in the United States. The issues raised by Native Americans about why and how archaeological research is conducted, however, go beyond NAGPRA to the paradigmatic basis of archaeology. Archaeologists will have new opportunities available to them if they work in partnership with Native Americans in studying the rich archaeological record in the Americas.

KW - American Indians

KW - Cultural resources management

KW - Ethics

KW - Repatriation

KW - Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011072212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011072212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0011072212

VL - 25

SP - 63

EP - 79

JO - Annual Review of Anthropology

JF - Annual Review of Anthropology

SN - 0084-6570

IS - 1

ER -