Nature of electric and magnetic dipoles gleaned from the Poynting theorem and the Lorentz force law of classical electrodynamics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Starting with the most general form of Maxwell's macroscopic equations in which the free charge and free current densities, ρfree and Jfree, as well as the densities of polarization and magnetization, P and M, are arbitrary functions of space and time, we compare and contrast two versions of the Poynting vector, namely, S = μo- 1E × B and S = E × H. Here E is the electric field, H is the magnetic field, B is the magnetic induction, and μo is the permeability of free space. We argue that the identification of one or the other of these Poynting vectors with the rate of flow of electromagnetic energy is intimately tied to the nature of magnetic dipoles and the way in which these dipoles exchange energy with the electromagnetic field. In addition, the manifest nature of both electric and magnetic dipoles in their interactions with the electromagnetic field has consequences for the Lorentz law of force. If the conventional identification of magnetic dipoles with Amperian current loops is extended beyond Maxwell's macroscopic equations to the domain where energy, force, torque, momentum, and angular momentum are active participants, it will be shown that "hidden energy" and "hidden momentum" become inescapable consequences of such identification with Amperian current loops. Hidden energy and hidden momentum can be avoided, however, if we adopt S = E × H as the true Poynting vector, and also accept a generalized version of the Lorentz force law. We conclude that the identification of magnetic dipoles with Amperian current loops, while certainly acceptable within the confines of Maxwell's macroscopic equations, is inadequate and leads to complications when considering energy, force, torque, momentum, and angular momentum in electromagnetic systems that involve the interaction of fields and matter.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)594-602
Number of pages9
JournalOptics Communications
Volume284
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2011

Fingerprint

Poynting theorem
Lorentz force
Electrodynamics
magnetic dipoles
electrodynamics
electric dipoles
Momentum
Maxwell equations
momentum
Angular momentum
Electromagnetic fields
macroscopic equations
Torque
Electromagnetic induction
Electromagnetic waves
Magnetization
Current density
Electric fields
torque
Polarization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Cite this

@article{757e8a598a044eefb684b0c1adba6840,
title = "Nature of electric and magnetic dipoles gleaned from the Poynting theorem and the Lorentz force law of classical electrodynamics",
abstract = "Starting with the most general form of Maxwell's macroscopic equations in which the free charge and free current densities, ρfree and Jfree, as well as the densities of polarization and magnetization, P and M, are arbitrary functions of space and time, we compare and contrast two versions of the Poynting vector, namely, S = μo- 1E × B and S = E × H. Here E is the electric field, H is the magnetic field, B is the magnetic induction, and μo is the permeability of free space. We argue that the identification of one or the other of these Poynting vectors with the rate of flow of electromagnetic energy is intimately tied to the nature of magnetic dipoles and the way in which these dipoles exchange energy with the electromagnetic field. In addition, the manifest nature of both electric and magnetic dipoles in their interactions with the electromagnetic field has consequences for the Lorentz law of force. If the conventional identification of magnetic dipoles with Amperian current loops is extended beyond Maxwell's macroscopic equations to the domain where energy, force, torque, momentum, and angular momentum are active participants, it will be shown that {"}hidden energy{"} and {"}hidden momentum{"} become inescapable consequences of such identification with Amperian current loops. Hidden energy and hidden momentum can be avoided, however, if we adopt S = E × H as the true Poynting vector, and also accept a generalized version of the Lorentz force law. We conclude that the identification of magnetic dipoles with Amperian current loops, while certainly acceptable within the confines of Maxwell's macroscopic equations, is inadequate and leads to complications when considering energy, force, torque, momentum, and angular momentum in electromagnetic systems that involve the interaction of fields and matter.",
author = "Masud Mansuripur",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.optcom.2010.08.079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "284",
pages = "594--602",
journal = "Optics Communications",
issn = "0030-4018",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nature of electric and magnetic dipoles gleaned from the Poynting theorem and the Lorentz force law of classical electrodynamics

AU - Mansuripur, Masud

PY - 2011/1/15

Y1 - 2011/1/15

N2 - Starting with the most general form of Maxwell's macroscopic equations in which the free charge and free current densities, ρfree and Jfree, as well as the densities of polarization and magnetization, P and M, are arbitrary functions of space and time, we compare and contrast two versions of the Poynting vector, namely, S = μo- 1E × B and S = E × H. Here E is the electric field, H is the magnetic field, B is the magnetic induction, and μo is the permeability of free space. We argue that the identification of one or the other of these Poynting vectors with the rate of flow of electromagnetic energy is intimately tied to the nature of magnetic dipoles and the way in which these dipoles exchange energy with the electromagnetic field. In addition, the manifest nature of both electric and magnetic dipoles in their interactions with the electromagnetic field has consequences for the Lorentz law of force. If the conventional identification of magnetic dipoles with Amperian current loops is extended beyond Maxwell's macroscopic equations to the domain where energy, force, torque, momentum, and angular momentum are active participants, it will be shown that "hidden energy" and "hidden momentum" become inescapable consequences of such identification with Amperian current loops. Hidden energy and hidden momentum can be avoided, however, if we adopt S = E × H as the true Poynting vector, and also accept a generalized version of the Lorentz force law. We conclude that the identification of magnetic dipoles with Amperian current loops, while certainly acceptable within the confines of Maxwell's macroscopic equations, is inadequate and leads to complications when considering energy, force, torque, momentum, and angular momentum in electromagnetic systems that involve the interaction of fields and matter.

AB - Starting with the most general form of Maxwell's macroscopic equations in which the free charge and free current densities, ρfree and Jfree, as well as the densities of polarization and magnetization, P and M, are arbitrary functions of space and time, we compare and contrast two versions of the Poynting vector, namely, S = μo- 1E × B and S = E × H. Here E is the electric field, H is the magnetic field, B is the magnetic induction, and μo is the permeability of free space. We argue that the identification of one or the other of these Poynting vectors with the rate of flow of electromagnetic energy is intimately tied to the nature of magnetic dipoles and the way in which these dipoles exchange energy with the electromagnetic field. In addition, the manifest nature of both electric and magnetic dipoles in their interactions with the electromagnetic field has consequences for the Lorentz law of force. If the conventional identification of magnetic dipoles with Amperian current loops is extended beyond Maxwell's macroscopic equations to the domain where energy, force, torque, momentum, and angular momentum are active participants, it will be shown that "hidden energy" and "hidden momentum" become inescapable consequences of such identification with Amperian current loops. Hidden energy and hidden momentum can be avoided, however, if we adopt S = E × H as the true Poynting vector, and also accept a generalized version of the Lorentz force law. We conclude that the identification of magnetic dipoles with Amperian current loops, while certainly acceptable within the confines of Maxwell's macroscopic equations, is inadequate and leads to complications when considering energy, force, torque, momentum, and angular momentum in electromagnetic systems that involve the interaction of fields and matter.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649334117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649334117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.optcom.2010.08.079

DO - 10.1016/j.optcom.2010.08.079

M3 - Article

VL - 284

SP - 594

EP - 602

JO - Optics Communications

JF - Optics Communications

SN - 0030-4018

IS - 2

ER -