Negative and positive party identification in post-communist countries

Richard Rose, William T Mishler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To understand party identification in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe, we need to give equal attention to negative partisanship - the identification of a party that an individual would never vote for - as well as positive party identification. Our institutionalist approach posits that in a one-party state the Party will be distrusted, and socialization will encourage people to form a negative party identification. Survey data from 1995 in Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovenia show 77% have a negative identification and only 30% are positive; this produces a fourfold typology of open, closed, apathetic and negative partisans. Discriminant function analysis is used to identify political, economic and social structure influences on this typology of partisanship. Negative partisanship is then distinguished between the rejection of ideologically polarizing parties, whether Communist, right-wing, reformist or religious, or the rejection of parties appealing exclusively to a limited segment of the electorate, such as a minority ethnic group. Discriminant function analysis identifies leading influences on the reaction against particular types of parties. The conclusion considers whether post-Communist citizens are more likely to move from negative to positive partisanship or become knowledgeable sceptics, and concludes that the development of knowledgeable scepticism is more likely.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-234
Number of pages18
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1998

Fingerprint

typology
one-party state
political structure
economic structure
communist party
Slovenia
Romania
Central Europe
Hungary
social structure
Eastern Europe
socialization
Poland
voter
ethnic group
minority
citizen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Negative and positive party identification in post-communist countries. / Rose, Richard; Mishler, William T.

In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, 06.1998, p. 217-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{efa5b53248c648b28581675e6ed7f939,
title = "Negative and positive party identification in post-communist countries",
abstract = "To understand party identification in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe, we need to give equal attention to negative partisanship - the identification of a party that an individual would never vote for - as well as positive party identification. Our institutionalist approach posits that in a one-party state the Party will be distrusted, and socialization will encourage people to form a negative party identification. Survey data from 1995 in Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovenia show 77{\%} have a negative identification and only 30{\%} are positive; this produces a fourfold typology of open, closed, apathetic and negative partisans. Discriminant function analysis is used to identify political, economic and social structure influences on this typology of partisanship. Negative partisanship is then distinguished between the rejection of ideologically polarizing parties, whether Communist, right-wing, reformist or religious, or the rejection of parties appealing exclusively to a limited segment of the electorate, such as a minority ethnic group. Discriminant function analysis identifies leading influences on the reaction against particular types of parties. The conclusion considers whether post-Communist citizens are more likely to move from negative to positive partisanship or become knowledgeable sceptics, and concludes that the development of knowledgeable scepticism is more likely.",
author = "Richard Rose and Mishler, {William T}",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00016-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "217--234",
journal = "Electoral Studies",
issn = "0261-3794",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negative and positive party identification in post-communist countries

AU - Rose, Richard

AU - Mishler, William T

PY - 1998/6

Y1 - 1998/6

N2 - To understand party identification in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe, we need to give equal attention to negative partisanship - the identification of a party that an individual would never vote for - as well as positive party identification. Our institutionalist approach posits that in a one-party state the Party will be distrusted, and socialization will encourage people to form a negative party identification. Survey data from 1995 in Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovenia show 77% have a negative identification and only 30% are positive; this produces a fourfold typology of open, closed, apathetic and negative partisans. Discriminant function analysis is used to identify political, economic and social structure influences on this typology of partisanship. Negative partisanship is then distinguished between the rejection of ideologically polarizing parties, whether Communist, right-wing, reformist or religious, or the rejection of parties appealing exclusively to a limited segment of the electorate, such as a minority ethnic group. Discriminant function analysis identifies leading influences on the reaction against particular types of parties. The conclusion considers whether post-Communist citizens are more likely to move from negative to positive partisanship or become knowledgeable sceptics, and concludes that the development of knowledgeable scepticism is more likely.

AB - To understand party identification in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe, we need to give equal attention to negative partisanship - the identification of a party that an individual would never vote for - as well as positive party identification. Our institutionalist approach posits that in a one-party state the Party will be distrusted, and socialization will encourage people to form a negative party identification. Survey data from 1995 in Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovenia show 77% have a negative identification and only 30% are positive; this produces a fourfold typology of open, closed, apathetic and negative partisans. Discriminant function analysis is used to identify political, economic and social structure influences on this typology of partisanship. Negative partisanship is then distinguished between the rejection of ideologically polarizing parties, whether Communist, right-wing, reformist or religious, or the rejection of parties appealing exclusively to a limited segment of the electorate, such as a minority ethnic group. Discriminant function analysis identifies leading influences on the reaction against particular types of parties. The conclusion considers whether post-Communist citizens are more likely to move from negative to positive partisanship or become knowledgeable sceptics, and concludes that the development of knowledgeable scepticism is more likely.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031792316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031792316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00016-X

DO - 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00016-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031792316

VL - 17

SP - 217

EP - 234

JO - Electoral Studies

JF - Electoral Studies

SN - 0261-3794

IS - 2

ER -