Neural organization of linguistic short-term memory is sensory modality-dependent: Evidence from signed and spoken language

Judy Pa, Stephen M Wilson, Herbert Pickell, Ursula Bellugi, Gregory Hickok

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite decades of research, there is still disagreement regarding the nature of the information that is maintained in linguistic short-term memory (STM). Some authors argue for abstract phonological codes, whereas others argue for more general sensory traces. We assess these possibilities by investigating linguistic STM in two distinct sensory-motor modalities, spoken and signed language. Hearing bilingual participants (native in English and American Sign Language) performed equivalent STM tasks in both languages during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Distinct, sensory-specific activations were seen during the maintenance phase of the task for spoken versus signed language. These regions have been previously shown to respond to nonlinguistic sensory stimulation, suggesting that linguistic STM tasks recruit sensory-specific networks. However, maintenance-phase activations common to the two languages were also observed, implying some form of common process. We conclude that linguistic STM involves sensory-dependent neural networks, but suggest that sensory-independent neural networks may also exist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2198-2210
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume20
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Short-Term Memory
Language
Maintenance
Sign Language
Hearing
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Neural organization of linguistic short-term memory is sensory modality-dependent : Evidence from signed and spoken language. / Pa, Judy; Wilson, Stephen M; Pickell, Herbert; Bellugi, Ursula; Hickok, Gregory.

In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 20, No. 12, 12.2008, p. 2198-2210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d0767e588978421682f7e8237a023dfa,
title = "Neural organization of linguistic short-term memory is sensory modality-dependent: Evidence from signed and spoken language",
abstract = "Despite decades of research, there is still disagreement regarding the nature of the information that is maintained in linguistic short-term memory (STM). Some authors argue for abstract phonological codes, whereas others argue for more general sensory traces. We assess these possibilities by investigating linguistic STM in two distinct sensory-motor modalities, spoken and signed language. Hearing bilingual participants (native in English and American Sign Language) performed equivalent STM tasks in both languages during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Distinct, sensory-specific activations were seen during the maintenance phase of the task for spoken versus signed language. These regions have been previously shown to respond to nonlinguistic sensory stimulation, suggesting that linguistic STM tasks recruit sensory-specific networks. However, maintenance-phase activations common to the two languages were also observed, implying some form of common process. We conclude that linguistic STM involves sensory-dependent neural networks, but suggest that sensory-independent neural networks may also exist.",
author = "Judy Pa and Wilson, {Stephen M} and Herbert Pickell and Ursula Bellugi and Gregory Hickok",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1162/jocn.2008.20154",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "2198--2210",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "0898-929X",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural organization of linguistic short-term memory is sensory modality-dependent

T2 - Evidence from signed and spoken language

AU - Pa, Judy

AU - Wilson, Stephen M

AU - Pickell, Herbert

AU - Bellugi, Ursula

AU - Hickok, Gregory

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Despite decades of research, there is still disagreement regarding the nature of the information that is maintained in linguistic short-term memory (STM). Some authors argue for abstract phonological codes, whereas others argue for more general sensory traces. We assess these possibilities by investigating linguistic STM in two distinct sensory-motor modalities, spoken and signed language. Hearing bilingual participants (native in English and American Sign Language) performed equivalent STM tasks in both languages during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Distinct, sensory-specific activations were seen during the maintenance phase of the task for spoken versus signed language. These regions have been previously shown to respond to nonlinguistic sensory stimulation, suggesting that linguistic STM tasks recruit sensory-specific networks. However, maintenance-phase activations common to the two languages were also observed, implying some form of common process. We conclude that linguistic STM involves sensory-dependent neural networks, but suggest that sensory-independent neural networks may also exist.

AB - Despite decades of research, there is still disagreement regarding the nature of the information that is maintained in linguistic short-term memory (STM). Some authors argue for abstract phonological codes, whereas others argue for more general sensory traces. We assess these possibilities by investigating linguistic STM in two distinct sensory-motor modalities, spoken and signed language. Hearing bilingual participants (native in English and American Sign Language) performed equivalent STM tasks in both languages during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Distinct, sensory-specific activations were seen during the maintenance phase of the task for spoken versus signed language. These regions have been previously shown to respond to nonlinguistic sensory stimulation, suggesting that linguistic STM tasks recruit sensory-specific networks. However, maintenance-phase activations common to the two languages were also observed, implying some form of common process. We conclude that linguistic STM involves sensory-dependent neural networks, but suggest that sensory-independent neural networks may also exist.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56649108209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56649108209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/jocn.2008.20154

DO - 10.1162/jocn.2008.20154

M3 - Article

C2 - 18457510

AN - SCOPUS:56649108209

VL - 20

SP - 2198

EP - 2210

JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 0898-929X

IS - 12

ER -