Neuroscientific Prediction and the Intrusion of Intuitive Metaphysics

David Rose; Wesley Buckwalter; Shaun Nichols

doi:10.1111/cogs.12310

Neuroscientific Prediction and the Intrusion of Intuitive Metaphysics

David Rose, Wesley Buckwalter, Shaun Nichols

Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

How might advanced neuroscience—in which perfect neuro-predictions are possible—interact with ordinary judgments of free will? We propose that peoples' intuitive ideas about indeterminist free will are both imported into and intrude into their representation of neuroscientific scenarios and present six experiments demonstrating intrusion and importing effects in the context of scenarios depicting perfect neuro-prediction. In light of our findings, we suggest that the intuitive commitment to indeterminist free will may be resilient in the face of scientific evidence against such free will.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	482-502
Number of pages	21
Journal	Cognitive science
Volume	41
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12310
State	Published - Mar 1 2017

Keywords

Compatibilism
Cultural transmission
Free will
Importing
Intrusion effect
Neuroscience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Neuroscience
Artificial Intelligence

Access to Document

10.1111/cogs.12310

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Neuroscientific Prediction and the Intrusion of Intuitive Metaphysics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{4cf59cb0cc00496c8f28194c261c38e1,

title = "Neuroscientific Prediction and the Intrusion of Intuitive Metaphysics",

abstract = "How might advanced neuroscience—in which perfect neuro-predictions are possible—interact with ordinary judgments of free will? We propose that peoples' intuitive ideas about indeterminist free will are both imported into and intrude into their representation of neuroscientific scenarios and present six experiments demonstrating intrusion and importing effects in the context of scenarios depicting perfect neuro-prediction. In light of our findings, we suggest that the intuitive commitment to indeterminist free will may be resilient in the face of scientific evidence against such free will.",

keywords = "Compatibilism, Cultural transmission, Free will, Importing, Intrusion effect, Neuroscience",

author = "David Rose and Wesley Buckwalter and Shaun Nichols",

note = "Funding Information: We thank Alisabeth Ayars, Josh Knobe, Myrto Mylopoulos, Eddy Nahmias, Gualtiero Piccinini, Jason Shepherd, John Turri, two anonymous reviewers, and audiences at the Society for Philosophy and Psychology for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. This research was supported by a Banting Fellowship awarded to Wesley Buckwalter through the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.",

year = "2017",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/cogs.12310",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "41",

pages = "482--502",

journal = "Cognitive Science",

issn = "0364-0213",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuroscientific Prediction and the Intrusion of Intuitive Metaphysics

AU - Rose, David

AU - Buckwalter, Wesley

AU - Nichols, Shaun

N1 - Funding Information: We thank Alisabeth Ayars, Josh Knobe, Myrto Mylopoulos, Eddy Nahmias, Gualtiero Piccinini, Jason Shepherd, John Turri, two anonymous reviewers, and audiences at the Society for Philosophy and Psychology for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. This research was supported by a Banting Fellowship awarded to Wesley Buckwalter through the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - How might advanced neuroscience—in which perfect neuro-predictions are possible—interact with ordinary judgments of free will? We propose that peoples' intuitive ideas about indeterminist free will are both imported into and intrude into their representation of neuroscientific scenarios and present six experiments demonstrating intrusion and importing effects in the context of scenarios depicting perfect neuro-prediction. In light of our findings, we suggest that the intuitive commitment to indeterminist free will may be resilient in the face of scientific evidence against such free will.

AB - How might advanced neuroscience—in which perfect neuro-predictions are possible—interact with ordinary judgments of free will? We propose that peoples' intuitive ideas about indeterminist free will are both imported into and intrude into their representation of neuroscientific scenarios and present six experiments demonstrating intrusion and importing effects in the context of scenarios depicting perfect neuro-prediction. In light of our findings, we suggest that the intuitive commitment to indeterminist free will may be resilient in the face of scientific evidence against such free will.

KW - Compatibilism

KW - Cultural transmission

KW - Free will

KW - Importing

KW - Intrusion effect

KW - Neuroscience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944389220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944389220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cogs.12310

DO - 10.1111/cogs.12310

M3 - Article

C2 - 26452629

AN - SCOPUS:84944389220

VL - 41

SP - 482

EP - 502

JO - Cognitive Science

JF - Cognitive Science

SN - 0364-0213

IS - 2

ER -