[No title available]

Cecile M Mckee, Maria Emiliani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper re-examines data from Italian children that Antinucci and Miller (1976) used to demonstrate a stage of obligatory object agreement - a stage representing a significant failure of correspondence between children's developing grammars and the target adult grammar. We interpret the relevant utterances as consistent with the target grammar, and argue that this is a more plausible construal. We also present an elicited production study which corroborates our interpretation. We replicate the kind of data Antinucci and Miller report and in gaps in their corpus. Our interpretation of the data thus crucially undermines the positions of both Antinucci and Miller (1976) and Borer and Wexler (1992). They use the object agreement to support theoretical claims violating the hypothesis that developing grammars obey the constraints of Universal Grammar throughout.

Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)415-437
Number of pages23
JournalNatural Language and Linguistic Theory
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1992
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

[No title available]. / Mckee, Cecile M; Emiliani, Maria.

In: Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, Vol. 10, No. 3, 08.1992, p. 415-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mckee, Cecile M ; Emiliani, Maria. / [No title available]. In: Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 1992 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 415-437.
@article{276057e44e6a44a7a40618f83da0e92b,
title = "[No title available]",
abstract = "This paper re-examines data from Italian children that Antinucci and Miller (1976) used to demonstrate a stage of obligatory object agreement - a stage representing a significant failure of correspondence between children's developing grammars and the target adult grammar. We interpret the relevant utterances as consistent with the target grammar, and argue that this is a more plausible construal. We also present an elicited production study which corroborates our interpretation. We replicate the kind of data Antinucci and Miller report and in gaps in their corpus. Our interpretation of the data thus crucially undermines the positions of both Antinucci and Miller (1976) and Borer and Wexler (1992). They use the object agreement to support theoretical claims violating the hypothesis that developing grammars obey the constraints of Universal Grammar throughout.",
author = "Mckee, {Cecile M} and Maria Emiliani",
year = "1992",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/BF00133369",
language = "Undefined/Unknown",
volume = "10",
pages = "415--437",
journal = "Natural Language and Linguistic Theory",
issn = "0167-806X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - [No title available]

AU - Mckee, Cecile M

AU - Emiliani, Maria

PY - 1992/8

Y1 - 1992/8

N2 - This paper re-examines data from Italian children that Antinucci and Miller (1976) used to demonstrate a stage of obligatory object agreement - a stage representing a significant failure of correspondence between children's developing grammars and the target adult grammar. We interpret the relevant utterances as consistent with the target grammar, and argue that this is a more plausible construal. We also present an elicited production study which corroborates our interpretation. We replicate the kind of data Antinucci and Miller report and in gaps in their corpus. Our interpretation of the data thus crucially undermines the positions of both Antinucci and Miller (1976) and Borer and Wexler (1992). They use the object agreement to support theoretical claims violating the hypothesis that developing grammars obey the constraints of Universal Grammar throughout.

AB - This paper re-examines data from Italian children that Antinucci and Miller (1976) used to demonstrate a stage of obligatory object agreement - a stage representing a significant failure of correspondence between children's developing grammars and the target adult grammar. We interpret the relevant utterances as consistent with the target grammar, and argue that this is a more plausible construal. We also present an elicited production study which corroborates our interpretation. We replicate the kind of data Antinucci and Miller report and in gaps in their corpus. Our interpretation of the data thus crucially undermines the positions of both Antinucci and Miller (1976) and Borer and Wexler (1992). They use the object agreement to support theoretical claims violating the hypothesis that developing grammars obey the constraints of Universal Grammar throughout.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249842959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249842959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00133369

DO - 10.1007/BF00133369

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34249842959

VL - 10

SP - 415

EP - 437

JO - Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

JF - Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

SN - 0167-806X

IS - 3

ER -