Nomenclature wars: Ethnologists and anthropologists seeking to be scientists, 1840–1910

Don D. Fowler, Nancy J Parezo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Scholarly disciplines are ever-changing and continuously debated constellations of intellectual heritage and contemporary issues. This article discusses debates over anthropological nomenclature, anthropometric indices, and museum exhibit design in the development of European and American anthropology from its ethnological beginnings in the 1840s through nineteenth-century evolutionism to the establishment of the Boasian historical particularist approach after 1904. It also outlines the impacts of those debates and disagreements on the subsequent development of the “four-field approach” in American-university-based anthropology programs. The transitions from ethnology to evolutionism to particularism can be followed through arguments over nomenclature, anthropometrics, and the content and design of museum exhibits, as nascent anthropologists defined and redefined their subfield(s) of study and attempted to become part of the burgeoning Science Establishment of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in Europe and North America. The arguments and their (sometimes) resolutions laid the foundations for twentieth-century university-based anthropology programs and ethnographic and archaeological exhibits in anthropology and natural history museums. The article is, thus, a contribution to the developmental history of anthropology in Europe and North America.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)388-411
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Anthropological Research
Volume74
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

anthropology
museum
twentieth century
particularism
ethnology
university
history
nineteenth century
Anthropologists
Ethnologists
Nomenclature
Anthropology
science
Anthropometrics
Evolutionism

Keywords

  • Anthropology as science
  • Ethnology
  • History of anthropology
  • Museum exhibits
  • Systems of nomenclature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Nomenclature wars : Ethnologists and anthropologists seeking to be scientists, 1840–1910. / Fowler, Don D.; Parezo, Nancy J.

In: Journal of Anthropological Research, Vol. 74, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 388-411.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f134239bcac641718f5a47269ac4493f,
title = "Nomenclature wars: Ethnologists and anthropologists seeking to be scientists, 1840–1910",
abstract = "Scholarly disciplines are ever-changing and continuously debated constellations of intellectual heritage and contemporary issues. This article discusses debates over anthropological nomenclature, anthropometric indices, and museum exhibit design in the development of European and American anthropology from its ethnological beginnings in the 1840s through nineteenth-century evolutionism to the establishment of the Boasian historical particularist approach after 1904. It also outlines the impacts of those debates and disagreements on the subsequent development of the “four-field approach” in American-university-based anthropology programs. The transitions from ethnology to evolutionism to particularism can be followed through arguments over nomenclature, anthropometrics, and the content and design of museum exhibits, as nascent anthropologists defined and redefined their subfield(s) of study and attempted to become part of the burgeoning Science Establishment of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in Europe and North America. The arguments and their (sometimes) resolutions laid the foundations for twentieth-century university-based anthropology programs and ethnographic and archaeological exhibits in anthropology and natural history museums. The article is, thus, a contribution to the developmental history of anthropology in Europe and North America.",
keywords = "Anthropology as science, Ethnology, History of anthropology, Museum exhibits, Systems of nomenclature",
author = "Fowler, {Don D.} and Parezo, {Nancy J}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/698699",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "388--411",
journal = "Journal of Anthropological Research",
issn = "0091-7710",
publisher = "University of New Mexico",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nomenclature wars

T2 - Ethnologists and anthropologists seeking to be scientists, 1840–1910

AU - Fowler, Don D.

AU - Parezo, Nancy J

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Scholarly disciplines are ever-changing and continuously debated constellations of intellectual heritage and contemporary issues. This article discusses debates over anthropological nomenclature, anthropometric indices, and museum exhibit design in the development of European and American anthropology from its ethnological beginnings in the 1840s through nineteenth-century evolutionism to the establishment of the Boasian historical particularist approach after 1904. It also outlines the impacts of those debates and disagreements on the subsequent development of the “four-field approach” in American-university-based anthropology programs. The transitions from ethnology to evolutionism to particularism can be followed through arguments over nomenclature, anthropometrics, and the content and design of museum exhibits, as nascent anthropologists defined and redefined their subfield(s) of study and attempted to become part of the burgeoning Science Establishment of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in Europe and North America. The arguments and their (sometimes) resolutions laid the foundations for twentieth-century university-based anthropology programs and ethnographic and archaeological exhibits in anthropology and natural history museums. The article is, thus, a contribution to the developmental history of anthropology in Europe and North America.

AB - Scholarly disciplines are ever-changing and continuously debated constellations of intellectual heritage and contemporary issues. This article discusses debates over anthropological nomenclature, anthropometric indices, and museum exhibit design in the development of European and American anthropology from its ethnological beginnings in the 1840s through nineteenth-century evolutionism to the establishment of the Boasian historical particularist approach after 1904. It also outlines the impacts of those debates and disagreements on the subsequent development of the “four-field approach” in American-university-based anthropology programs. The transitions from ethnology to evolutionism to particularism can be followed through arguments over nomenclature, anthropometrics, and the content and design of museum exhibits, as nascent anthropologists defined and redefined their subfield(s) of study and attempted to become part of the burgeoning Science Establishment of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in Europe and North America. The arguments and their (sometimes) resolutions laid the foundations for twentieth-century university-based anthropology programs and ethnographic and archaeological exhibits in anthropology and natural history museums. The article is, thus, a contribution to the developmental history of anthropology in Europe and North America.

KW - Anthropology as science

KW - Ethnology

KW - History of anthropology

KW - Museum exhibits

KW - Systems of nomenclature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052385702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052385702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/698699

DO - 10.1086/698699

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052385702

VL - 74

SP - 388

EP - 411

JO - Journal of Anthropological Research

JF - Journal of Anthropological Research

SN - 0091-7710

IS - 3

ER -