Nonuniform allocation of hippocampal neurons to place fields across all hippocampal subfields

W. K L Witharana, J. Cardiff, M. K. Chawla, J. Y. Xie, C. B. Alme, M. Eckert, V. Lapointe, A. Demchuk, A. P. Maurer, V. Trivedi, R. J. Sutherland, J. F. Guzowski, Carol A Barnes, B. L. McNaughton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The mechanisms governing how the hippocampus selects neurons to exhibit place fields are not well understood. A default assumption in some previous studies was the uniform random draw with replacement (URDWR) model, which, theoretically, maximizes spatial “pattern separation”, and predicts a Poisson distribution of the numbers of place fields expressed by a given cell per unit area. The actual distribution of mean firing rates exhibited by a population of hippocampal neurons, however, is approximately exponential or log-normal in a given environment and these rates are somewhat correlated across multiple places, at least under some conditions. The advantage of neural activity-dependent immediate-early gene (IEG) analysis, as a proxy for electrophysiological recording, is the ability to obtain much larger samples of cells, even those whose activity is so sparse that they are overlooked in recording studies. Thus, a more accurate representation of the activation statistics can potentially be achieved. Some previous IEG studies that examined behavior-driven IEG expression in CA1 appear to support URDWR. There was, however, in some of the same studies, an under-recruitment of dentate gyrus granule cells, indicating a highly skewed excitability distribution, which is inconsistent with URDWR. Although it was suggested that this skewness might be related to increased excitability of recently generated granule cells, we show here that CA1, CA3, and subiculum also exhibit cumulative under-recruitment of neurons. Thus, a highly skewed excitability distribution is a general principle common to all major hippocampal subfields. Finally, a more detailed analysis of the frequency distributions of IEG intranuclear transcription foci suggests that a large fraction of hippocampal neurons is virtually silent, even during sleep. Whether the skewing of the excitability distribution is cell-intrinsic or a network phenomenon, and the degree to which this excitability is fixed or possibly time-varying are open questions for future studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1328-1344
Number of pages17
JournalHippocampus
Volume26
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Immediate-Early Genes
Neurons
Hippocampus
Genetic Transcription
Poisson Distribution
Aptitude
Dentate Gyrus
Proxy
Sleep
Gene Expression
Population

Keywords

  • hippocampus
  • immediate early genes
  • place allocation
  • place cells
  • remapping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Witharana, W. K. L., Cardiff, J., Chawla, M. K., Xie, J. Y., Alme, C. B., Eckert, M., ... McNaughton, B. L. (2016). Nonuniform allocation of hippocampal neurons to place fields across all hippocampal subfields. Hippocampus, 26(10), 1328-1344. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22609

Nonuniform allocation of hippocampal neurons to place fields across all hippocampal subfields. / Witharana, W. K L; Cardiff, J.; Chawla, M. K.; Xie, J. Y.; Alme, C. B.; Eckert, M.; Lapointe, V.; Demchuk, A.; Maurer, A. P.; Trivedi, V.; Sutherland, R. J.; Guzowski, J. F.; Barnes, Carol A; McNaughton, B. L.

In: Hippocampus, Vol. 26, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 1328-1344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Witharana, WKL, Cardiff, J, Chawla, MK, Xie, JY, Alme, CB, Eckert, M, Lapointe, V, Demchuk, A, Maurer, AP, Trivedi, V, Sutherland, RJ, Guzowski, JF, Barnes, CA & McNaughton, BL 2016, 'Nonuniform allocation of hippocampal neurons to place fields across all hippocampal subfields', Hippocampus, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1328-1344. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22609
Witharana WKL, Cardiff J, Chawla MK, Xie JY, Alme CB, Eckert M et al. Nonuniform allocation of hippocampal neurons to place fields across all hippocampal subfields. Hippocampus. 2016 Oct 1;26(10):1328-1344. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22609
Witharana, W. K L ; Cardiff, J. ; Chawla, M. K. ; Xie, J. Y. ; Alme, C. B. ; Eckert, M. ; Lapointe, V. ; Demchuk, A. ; Maurer, A. P. ; Trivedi, V. ; Sutherland, R. J. ; Guzowski, J. F. ; Barnes, Carol A ; McNaughton, B. L. / Nonuniform allocation of hippocampal neurons to place fields across all hippocampal subfields. In: Hippocampus. 2016 ; Vol. 26, No. 10. pp. 1328-1344.
@article{a1105a19b39e44b5ab03cd1d696c0cdd,
title = "Nonuniform allocation of hippocampal neurons to place fields across all hippocampal subfields",
abstract = "The mechanisms governing how the hippocampus selects neurons to exhibit place fields are not well understood. A default assumption in some previous studies was the uniform random draw with replacement (URDWR) model, which, theoretically, maximizes spatial “pattern separation”, and predicts a Poisson distribution of the numbers of place fields expressed by a given cell per unit area. The actual distribution of mean firing rates exhibited by a population of hippocampal neurons, however, is approximately exponential or log-normal in a given environment and these rates are somewhat correlated across multiple places, at least under some conditions. The advantage of neural activity-dependent immediate-early gene (IEG) analysis, as a proxy for electrophysiological recording, is the ability to obtain much larger samples of cells, even those whose activity is so sparse that they are overlooked in recording studies. Thus, a more accurate representation of the activation statistics can potentially be achieved. Some previous IEG studies that examined behavior-driven IEG expression in CA1 appear to support URDWR. There was, however, in some of the same studies, an under-recruitment of dentate gyrus granule cells, indicating a highly skewed excitability distribution, which is inconsistent with URDWR. Although it was suggested that this skewness might be related to increased excitability of recently generated granule cells, we show here that CA1, CA3, and subiculum also exhibit cumulative under-recruitment of neurons. Thus, a highly skewed excitability distribution is a general principle common to all major hippocampal subfields. Finally, a more detailed analysis of the frequency distributions of IEG intranuclear transcription foci suggests that a large fraction of hippocampal neurons is virtually silent, even during sleep. Whether the skewing of the excitability distribution is cell-intrinsic or a network phenomenon, and the degree to which this excitability is fixed or possibly time-varying are open questions for future studies.",
keywords = "hippocampus, immediate early genes, place allocation, place cells, remapping",
author = "Witharana, {W. K L} and J. Cardiff and Chawla, {M. K.} and Xie, {J. Y.} and Alme, {C. B.} and M. Eckert and V. Lapointe and A. Demchuk and Maurer, {A. P.} and V. Trivedi and Sutherland, {R. J.} and Guzowski, {J. F.} and Barnes, {Carol A} and McNaughton, {B. L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hipo.22609",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1328--1344",
journal = "Hippocampus",
issn = "1050-9631",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonuniform allocation of hippocampal neurons to place fields across all hippocampal subfields

AU - Witharana, W. K L

AU - Cardiff, J.

AU - Chawla, M. K.

AU - Xie, J. Y.

AU - Alme, C. B.

AU - Eckert, M.

AU - Lapointe, V.

AU - Demchuk, A.

AU - Maurer, A. P.

AU - Trivedi, V.

AU - Sutherland, R. J.

AU - Guzowski, J. F.

AU - Barnes, Carol A

AU - McNaughton, B. L.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - The mechanisms governing how the hippocampus selects neurons to exhibit place fields are not well understood. A default assumption in some previous studies was the uniform random draw with replacement (URDWR) model, which, theoretically, maximizes spatial “pattern separation”, and predicts a Poisson distribution of the numbers of place fields expressed by a given cell per unit area. The actual distribution of mean firing rates exhibited by a population of hippocampal neurons, however, is approximately exponential or log-normal in a given environment and these rates are somewhat correlated across multiple places, at least under some conditions. The advantage of neural activity-dependent immediate-early gene (IEG) analysis, as a proxy for electrophysiological recording, is the ability to obtain much larger samples of cells, even those whose activity is so sparse that they are overlooked in recording studies. Thus, a more accurate representation of the activation statistics can potentially be achieved. Some previous IEG studies that examined behavior-driven IEG expression in CA1 appear to support URDWR. There was, however, in some of the same studies, an under-recruitment of dentate gyrus granule cells, indicating a highly skewed excitability distribution, which is inconsistent with URDWR. Although it was suggested that this skewness might be related to increased excitability of recently generated granule cells, we show here that CA1, CA3, and subiculum also exhibit cumulative under-recruitment of neurons. Thus, a highly skewed excitability distribution is a general principle common to all major hippocampal subfields. Finally, a more detailed analysis of the frequency distributions of IEG intranuclear transcription foci suggests that a large fraction of hippocampal neurons is virtually silent, even during sleep. Whether the skewing of the excitability distribution is cell-intrinsic or a network phenomenon, and the degree to which this excitability is fixed or possibly time-varying are open questions for future studies.

AB - The mechanisms governing how the hippocampus selects neurons to exhibit place fields are not well understood. A default assumption in some previous studies was the uniform random draw with replacement (URDWR) model, which, theoretically, maximizes spatial “pattern separation”, and predicts a Poisson distribution of the numbers of place fields expressed by a given cell per unit area. The actual distribution of mean firing rates exhibited by a population of hippocampal neurons, however, is approximately exponential or log-normal in a given environment and these rates are somewhat correlated across multiple places, at least under some conditions. The advantage of neural activity-dependent immediate-early gene (IEG) analysis, as a proxy for electrophysiological recording, is the ability to obtain much larger samples of cells, even those whose activity is so sparse that they are overlooked in recording studies. Thus, a more accurate representation of the activation statistics can potentially be achieved. Some previous IEG studies that examined behavior-driven IEG expression in CA1 appear to support URDWR. There was, however, in some of the same studies, an under-recruitment of dentate gyrus granule cells, indicating a highly skewed excitability distribution, which is inconsistent with URDWR. Although it was suggested that this skewness might be related to increased excitability of recently generated granule cells, we show here that CA1, CA3, and subiculum also exhibit cumulative under-recruitment of neurons. Thus, a highly skewed excitability distribution is a general principle common to all major hippocampal subfields. Finally, a more detailed analysis of the frequency distributions of IEG intranuclear transcription foci suggests that a large fraction of hippocampal neurons is virtually silent, even during sleep. Whether the skewing of the excitability distribution is cell-intrinsic or a network phenomenon, and the degree to which this excitability is fixed or possibly time-varying are open questions for future studies.

KW - hippocampus

KW - immediate early genes

KW - place allocation

KW - place cells

KW - remapping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988410141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988410141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hipo.22609

DO - 10.1002/hipo.22609

M3 - Article

C2 - 27273259

AN - SCOPUS:84988410141

VL - 26

SP - 1328

EP - 1344

JO - Hippocampus

JF - Hippocampus

SN - 1050-9631

IS - 10

ER -