Normative Monocular Visual Acuity for Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Charts in Emmetropic Children 5 to 12 Years of Age

Velma Dobson, Candice E. Clifford-Donaldson, Tina K. Green, Joseph M Miller, Erin M Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To provide normative data for children tested with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 252 Native American (Tohono O'odham) children aged 5 to 12 years. On the basis of cycloplegic refraction conducted on the day of testing, all were emmetropic (myopia ≤0.25 diopter [D] spherical equivalent, hyperopia ≤1.00 D spherical equivalent, and astigmatism ≤0.50 D in both eyes). Methods: Monocular visual acuity was tested at 4 m, using 1 ETDRS chart for the right eye (RE) and another for the left eye (LE). Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity was scored as the total number of letters correctly identified, by naming or matching to letters on a lap card, and as the smallest letter size for which the child identified 3 of 5 letters correctly. Results: Visual acuity results did not differ for the RE versus the LE, so data are reported for the RE only. Mean visual acuity for 5-year-olds (0.16 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [20/29]) was significantly worse than for 8-, 9-, 10-, 11-, and 12-year-olds (0.05 logMAR [20/22] or better at each age). The lower 95% prediction limit for determining whether a child has visual acuity within the normal range was 0.38 (20/48) for 5-year-olds and 0.30 (20/40) for 6- to 12-year-olds, which was reduced to 0.32 (20/42) for 5-year-olds and 0.21 (20/32) for 6- to 12-year-olds when recalculated with outlying data points removed. Mean interocular acuity difference did not vary by age, averaging less than 1 logMAR line at each age, with a lower 95% prediction limit of 0.17 log unit (1.7 logMAR lines) across all ages. Conclusions: For monocular visual acuity based on ETDRS charts to be in the normal range, it must be better than 20/50 for 5-year-olds and better than 20/40 for 6- to 12-year-olds. Normal interocular acuity difference includes values of less than 2 logMAR lines. Normative ETDRS visual acuity values are not as good as norms reported for adults, suggesting that a child's visual acuity results should be compared with norms based on data from children, not with adult norms. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1397-1401
Number of pages5
JournalOphthalmology
Volume116
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Diabetic Retinopathy
Visual Acuity
Therapeutics
Reference Values
Mydriatics
Hyperopia
Astigmatism
North American Indians
Myopia
Disclosure
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Normative Monocular Visual Acuity for Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Charts in Emmetropic Children 5 to 12 Years of Age. / Dobson, Velma; Clifford-Donaldson, Candice E.; Green, Tina K.; Miller, Joseph M; Harvey, Erin M.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 116, No. 7, 07.2009, p. 1397-1401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c53ce06dcec24f16be8dd8ad7adca8bf,
title = "Normative Monocular Visual Acuity for Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Charts in Emmetropic Children 5 to 12 Years of Age",
abstract = "Objective: To provide normative data for children tested with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 252 Native American (Tohono O'odham) children aged 5 to 12 years. On the basis of cycloplegic refraction conducted on the day of testing, all were emmetropic (myopia ≤0.25 diopter [D] spherical equivalent, hyperopia ≤1.00 D spherical equivalent, and astigmatism ≤0.50 D in both eyes). Methods: Monocular visual acuity was tested at 4 m, using 1 ETDRS chart for the right eye (RE) and another for the left eye (LE). Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity was scored as the total number of letters correctly identified, by naming or matching to letters on a lap card, and as the smallest letter size for which the child identified 3 of 5 letters correctly. Results: Visual acuity results did not differ for the RE versus the LE, so data are reported for the RE only. Mean visual acuity for 5-year-olds (0.16 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [20/29]) was significantly worse than for 8-, 9-, 10-, 11-, and 12-year-olds (0.05 logMAR [20/22] or better at each age). The lower 95{\%} prediction limit for determining whether a child has visual acuity within the normal range was 0.38 (20/48) for 5-year-olds and 0.30 (20/40) for 6- to 12-year-olds, which was reduced to 0.32 (20/42) for 5-year-olds and 0.21 (20/32) for 6- to 12-year-olds when recalculated with outlying data points removed. Mean interocular acuity difference did not vary by age, averaging less than 1 logMAR line at each age, with a lower 95{\%} prediction limit of 0.17 log unit (1.7 logMAR lines) across all ages. Conclusions: For monocular visual acuity based on ETDRS charts to be in the normal range, it must be better than 20/50 for 5-year-olds and better than 20/40 for 6- to 12-year-olds. Normal interocular acuity difference includes values of less than 2 logMAR lines. Normative ETDRS visual acuity values are not as good as norms reported for adults, suggesting that a child's visual acuity results should be compared with norms based on data from children, not with adult norms. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.",
author = "Velma Dobson and Clifford-Donaldson, {Candice E.} and Green, {Tina K.} and Miller, {Joseph M} and Harvey, {Erin M}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "1397--1401",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normative Monocular Visual Acuity for Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Charts in Emmetropic Children 5 to 12 Years of Age

AU - Dobson, Velma

AU - Clifford-Donaldson, Candice E.

AU - Green, Tina K.

AU - Miller, Joseph M

AU - Harvey, Erin M

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Objective: To provide normative data for children tested with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 252 Native American (Tohono O'odham) children aged 5 to 12 years. On the basis of cycloplegic refraction conducted on the day of testing, all were emmetropic (myopia ≤0.25 diopter [D] spherical equivalent, hyperopia ≤1.00 D spherical equivalent, and astigmatism ≤0.50 D in both eyes). Methods: Monocular visual acuity was tested at 4 m, using 1 ETDRS chart for the right eye (RE) and another for the left eye (LE). Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity was scored as the total number of letters correctly identified, by naming or matching to letters on a lap card, and as the smallest letter size for which the child identified 3 of 5 letters correctly. Results: Visual acuity results did not differ for the RE versus the LE, so data are reported for the RE only. Mean visual acuity for 5-year-olds (0.16 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [20/29]) was significantly worse than for 8-, 9-, 10-, 11-, and 12-year-olds (0.05 logMAR [20/22] or better at each age). The lower 95% prediction limit for determining whether a child has visual acuity within the normal range was 0.38 (20/48) for 5-year-olds and 0.30 (20/40) for 6- to 12-year-olds, which was reduced to 0.32 (20/42) for 5-year-olds and 0.21 (20/32) for 6- to 12-year-olds when recalculated with outlying data points removed. Mean interocular acuity difference did not vary by age, averaging less than 1 logMAR line at each age, with a lower 95% prediction limit of 0.17 log unit (1.7 logMAR lines) across all ages. Conclusions: For monocular visual acuity based on ETDRS charts to be in the normal range, it must be better than 20/50 for 5-year-olds and better than 20/40 for 6- to 12-year-olds. Normal interocular acuity difference includes values of less than 2 logMAR lines. Normative ETDRS visual acuity values are not as good as norms reported for adults, suggesting that a child's visual acuity results should be compared with norms based on data from children, not with adult norms. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

AB - Objective: To provide normative data for children tested with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 252 Native American (Tohono O'odham) children aged 5 to 12 years. On the basis of cycloplegic refraction conducted on the day of testing, all were emmetropic (myopia ≤0.25 diopter [D] spherical equivalent, hyperopia ≤1.00 D spherical equivalent, and astigmatism ≤0.50 D in both eyes). Methods: Monocular visual acuity was tested at 4 m, using 1 ETDRS chart for the right eye (RE) and another for the left eye (LE). Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity was scored as the total number of letters correctly identified, by naming or matching to letters on a lap card, and as the smallest letter size for which the child identified 3 of 5 letters correctly. Results: Visual acuity results did not differ for the RE versus the LE, so data are reported for the RE only. Mean visual acuity for 5-year-olds (0.16 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [20/29]) was significantly worse than for 8-, 9-, 10-, 11-, and 12-year-olds (0.05 logMAR [20/22] or better at each age). The lower 95% prediction limit for determining whether a child has visual acuity within the normal range was 0.38 (20/48) for 5-year-olds and 0.30 (20/40) for 6- to 12-year-olds, which was reduced to 0.32 (20/42) for 5-year-olds and 0.21 (20/32) for 6- to 12-year-olds when recalculated with outlying data points removed. Mean interocular acuity difference did not vary by age, averaging less than 1 logMAR line at each age, with a lower 95% prediction limit of 0.17 log unit (1.7 logMAR lines) across all ages. Conclusions: For monocular visual acuity based on ETDRS charts to be in the normal range, it must be better than 20/50 for 5-year-olds and better than 20/40 for 6- to 12-year-olds. Normal interocular acuity difference includes values of less than 2 logMAR lines. Normative ETDRS visual acuity values are not as good as norms reported for adults, suggesting that a child's visual acuity results should be compared with norms based on data from children, not with adult norms. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649304472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649304472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.019

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.019

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 1397

EP - 1401

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 7

ER -