Object discrimination using electrotactile feedback

Tapas J. Arakeri, Brady A. Hasse, Andrew J Fuglevand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. A variety of bioengineering systems are being developed to restore tactile sensations in individuals who have lost somatosensory feedback because of spinal cord injury, stroke, or amputation. These systems typically detect tactile force with sensors placed on an insensate hand (or prosthetic hand in the case of amputees) and deliver touch information by electrically or mechanically stimulating sensate skin above the site of injury. Successful object manipulation, however, also requires proprioceptive feedback representing the configuration and movements of the hand and digits. Approach. Therefore, we developed a simple system that simultaneously provides information about tactile grip force and hand aperture using current amplitude-modulated electrotactile feedback. We evaluated the utility of this system by testing the ability of eight healthy human subjects to distinguish among 27 objects of varying sizes, weights, and compliances based entirely on electrotactile feedback. The feedback was modulated by grip-force and hand-aperture sensors placed on the hand of an experimenter (not visible to the subject) grasping and lifting the test objects. We were also interested to determine the degree to which subjects could learn to use such feedback when tested over five consecutive sessions. Main results. The average percentage correct identifications on day 1 (28.5% 8.2% correct) was well above chance (3.7%) and increased significantly with training to 49.2% 10.6% on day 5. Furthermore, this training transferred reasonably well to a set of novel objects. Significance. These results suggest that simple, non-invasive methods can provide useful multisensory feedback that might prove beneficial in improving the control over prosthetic limbs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number046007
JournalJournal of Neural Engineering
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 9 2018

Fingerprint

Hand
Touch
Feedback
Hand Strength
Prosthetics
Bioengineering
Amputees
Sensory Feedback
Aptitude
Spinal Cord Injuries
Amputation
Sensors
Compliance
Healthy Volunteers
Extremities
Stroke
Skin
Weights and Measures
Wounds and Injuries
Testing

Keywords

  • electrotactile
  • hand
  • neuroprosthetic
  • sensory feedback
  • somatosensory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Object discrimination using electrotactile feedback. / Arakeri, Tapas J.; Hasse, Brady A.; Fuglevand, Andrew J.

In: Journal of Neural Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, 046007, 09.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arakeri, Tapas J. ; Hasse, Brady A. ; Fuglevand, Andrew J. / Object discrimination using electrotactile feedback. In: Journal of Neural Engineering. 2018 ; Vol. 15, No. 4.
@article{0d4effc42a0444baa29029f493ba8919,
title = "Object discrimination using electrotactile feedback",
abstract = "Objective. A variety of bioengineering systems are being developed to restore tactile sensations in individuals who have lost somatosensory feedback because of spinal cord injury, stroke, or amputation. These systems typically detect tactile force with sensors placed on an insensate hand (or prosthetic hand in the case of amputees) and deliver touch information by electrically or mechanically stimulating sensate skin above the site of injury. Successful object manipulation, however, also requires proprioceptive feedback representing the configuration and movements of the hand and digits. Approach. Therefore, we developed a simple system that simultaneously provides information about tactile grip force and hand aperture using current amplitude-modulated electrotactile feedback. We evaluated the utility of this system by testing the ability of eight healthy human subjects to distinguish among 27 objects of varying sizes, weights, and compliances based entirely on electrotactile feedback. The feedback was modulated by grip-force and hand-aperture sensors placed on the hand of an experimenter (not visible to the subject) grasping and lifting the test objects. We were also interested to determine the degree to which subjects could learn to use such feedback when tested over five consecutive sessions. Main results. The average percentage correct identifications on day 1 (28.5{\%} 8.2{\%} correct) was well above chance (3.7{\%}) and increased significantly with training to 49.2{\%} 10.6{\%} on day 5. Furthermore, this training transferred reasonably well to a set of novel objects. Significance. These results suggest that simple, non-invasive methods can provide useful multisensory feedback that might prove beneficial in improving the control over prosthetic limbs.",
keywords = "electrotactile, hand, neuroprosthetic, sensory feedback, somatosensory",
author = "Arakeri, {Tapas J.} and Hasse, {Brady A.} and Fuglevand, {Andrew J}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1088/1741-2552/aabc9a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "Journal of Neural Engineering",
issn = "1741-2560",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Object discrimination using electrotactile feedback

AU - Arakeri, Tapas J.

AU - Hasse, Brady A.

AU - Fuglevand, Andrew J

PY - 2018/5/9

Y1 - 2018/5/9

N2 - Objective. A variety of bioengineering systems are being developed to restore tactile sensations in individuals who have lost somatosensory feedback because of spinal cord injury, stroke, or amputation. These systems typically detect tactile force with sensors placed on an insensate hand (or prosthetic hand in the case of amputees) and deliver touch information by electrically or mechanically stimulating sensate skin above the site of injury. Successful object manipulation, however, also requires proprioceptive feedback representing the configuration and movements of the hand and digits. Approach. Therefore, we developed a simple system that simultaneously provides information about tactile grip force and hand aperture using current amplitude-modulated electrotactile feedback. We evaluated the utility of this system by testing the ability of eight healthy human subjects to distinguish among 27 objects of varying sizes, weights, and compliances based entirely on electrotactile feedback. The feedback was modulated by grip-force and hand-aperture sensors placed on the hand of an experimenter (not visible to the subject) grasping and lifting the test objects. We were also interested to determine the degree to which subjects could learn to use such feedback when tested over five consecutive sessions. Main results. The average percentage correct identifications on day 1 (28.5% 8.2% correct) was well above chance (3.7%) and increased significantly with training to 49.2% 10.6% on day 5. Furthermore, this training transferred reasonably well to a set of novel objects. Significance. These results suggest that simple, non-invasive methods can provide useful multisensory feedback that might prove beneficial in improving the control over prosthetic limbs.

AB - Objective. A variety of bioengineering systems are being developed to restore tactile sensations in individuals who have lost somatosensory feedback because of spinal cord injury, stroke, or amputation. These systems typically detect tactile force with sensors placed on an insensate hand (or prosthetic hand in the case of amputees) and deliver touch information by electrically or mechanically stimulating sensate skin above the site of injury. Successful object manipulation, however, also requires proprioceptive feedback representing the configuration and movements of the hand and digits. Approach. Therefore, we developed a simple system that simultaneously provides information about tactile grip force and hand aperture using current amplitude-modulated electrotactile feedback. We evaluated the utility of this system by testing the ability of eight healthy human subjects to distinguish among 27 objects of varying sizes, weights, and compliances based entirely on electrotactile feedback. The feedback was modulated by grip-force and hand-aperture sensors placed on the hand of an experimenter (not visible to the subject) grasping and lifting the test objects. We were also interested to determine the degree to which subjects could learn to use such feedback when tested over five consecutive sessions. Main results. The average percentage correct identifications on day 1 (28.5% 8.2% correct) was well above chance (3.7%) and increased significantly with training to 49.2% 10.6% on day 5. Furthermore, this training transferred reasonably well to a set of novel objects. Significance. These results suggest that simple, non-invasive methods can provide useful multisensory feedback that might prove beneficial in improving the control over prosthetic limbs.

KW - electrotactile

KW - hand

KW - neuroprosthetic

KW - sensory feedback

KW - somatosensory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049868150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049868150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1741-2552/aabc9a

DO - 10.1088/1741-2552/aabc9a

M3 - Article

C2 - 29629874

AN - SCOPUS:85049868150

VL - 15

JO - Journal of Neural Engineering

JF - Journal of Neural Engineering

SN - 1741-2560

IS - 4

M1 - 046007

ER -