Objective threshold determination for nighttime eddy flux filtering

Lianhong Gu, Eva M. Falge, Tom Boden, Dennis D. Baldocchi, T. A. Black, Scott Saleska, Tanja Suni, Shashi B. Verma, Timo Vesala, Steve C. Wofsy, Liukang Xu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

190 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We recommend an automated statistical method (Moving Point Test, or MPT) to determine the friction velocity (u*) thresholds in nighttime eddy flux filtering. Our intention is to make the determination of the u* thresholds objective and reproducible and to keep flux treatment consistent over time and across sites. In developing the MPT method, we recognize that both ecosystem respiration and u* exhibit diurnal and seasonal cycles and there are potential correlative changes between them, which must be removed before u* can be used as a filter criterion. MPT uses an iterative approach to simultaneously determine a valid temperature response function, which is used to normalize nighttime flux measurements, and identify u* thresholds based on the normalized fluxes. Tests show that MPT works well for a variety of scenarios and vegetation types. We also recommend that in order to increase the reliability of nighttime flux filters, a detailed measurement of mean CO 2 concentration profiles need to be employed to calculate canopy storage changes accurately. Preferably, multiple profiles at different locations within the nighttime flux footprint should be used so that volume-averaged storage changes can be made. In addition, efforts should be made to minimize measurement gaps in summer nights as much as possible because of the short-time duration and frequent calm conditions, which greatly limit the amount of reliable data. We emphasize that the MPT method is not meant to be a final solution to the nighttime flux issue. Continuous theoretical and experimental researches are still needed to overcome the challenges in measuring nighttime fluxes accurately.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-197
Number of pages19
JournalAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
Volume128
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 28 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

eddy covariance
eddy
filter
ecosystem respiration
flux measurement
friction
footprint
vegetation types
vegetation type
respiration
statistical analysis
testing
canopy
duration
ecosystem
summer
methodology
method
temperature
test

Keywords

  • Eddy covariance
  • Fluxes
  • Friction velocity
  • Moving point test
  • Net ecosystem exchange
  • Turbulence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Objective threshold determination for nighttime eddy flux filtering. / Gu, Lianhong; Falge, Eva M.; Boden, Tom; Baldocchi, Dennis D.; Black, T. A.; Saleska, Scott; Suni, Tanja; Verma, Shashi B.; Vesala, Timo; Wofsy, Steve C.; Xu, Liukang.

In: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 128, No. 3-4, 28.02.2005, p. 179-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gu, L, Falge, EM, Boden, T, Baldocchi, DD, Black, TA, Saleska, S, Suni, T, Verma, SB, Vesala, T, Wofsy, SC & Xu, L 2005, 'Objective threshold determination for nighttime eddy flux filtering', Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 128, no. 3-4, pp. 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.006
Gu, Lianhong ; Falge, Eva M. ; Boden, Tom ; Baldocchi, Dennis D. ; Black, T. A. ; Saleska, Scott ; Suni, Tanja ; Verma, Shashi B. ; Vesala, Timo ; Wofsy, Steve C. ; Xu, Liukang. / Objective threshold determination for nighttime eddy flux filtering. In: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2005 ; Vol. 128, No. 3-4. pp. 179-197.
@article{966b4e06a87143d38f017c8912906c3c,
title = "Objective threshold determination for nighttime eddy flux filtering",
abstract = "We recommend an automated statistical method (Moving Point Test, or MPT) to determine the friction velocity (u*) thresholds in nighttime eddy flux filtering. Our intention is to make the determination of the u* thresholds objective and reproducible and to keep flux treatment consistent over time and across sites. In developing the MPT method, we recognize that both ecosystem respiration and u* exhibit diurnal and seasonal cycles and there are potential correlative changes between them, which must be removed before u* can be used as a filter criterion. MPT uses an iterative approach to simultaneously determine a valid temperature response function, which is used to normalize nighttime flux measurements, and identify u* thresholds based on the normalized fluxes. Tests show that MPT works well for a variety of scenarios and vegetation types. We also recommend that in order to increase the reliability of nighttime flux filters, a detailed measurement of mean CO 2 concentration profiles need to be employed to calculate canopy storage changes accurately. Preferably, multiple profiles at different locations within the nighttime flux footprint should be used so that volume-averaged storage changes can be made. In addition, efforts should be made to minimize measurement gaps in summer nights as much as possible because of the short-time duration and frequent calm conditions, which greatly limit the amount of reliable data. We emphasize that the MPT method is not meant to be a final solution to the nighttime flux issue. Continuous theoretical and experimental researches are still needed to overcome the challenges in measuring nighttime fluxes accurately.",
keywords = "Eddy covariance, Fluxes, Friction velocity, Moving point test, Net ecosystem exchange, Turbulence",
author = "Lianhong Gu and Falge, {Eva M.} and Tom Boden and Baldocchi, {Dennis D.} and Black, {T. A.} and Scott Saleska and Tanja Suni and Verma, {Shashi B.} and Timo Vesala and Wofsy, {Steve C.} and Liukang Xu",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "179--197",
journal = "Agricultural and Forest Meteorology",
issn = "0168-1923",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objective threshold determination for nighttime eddy flux filtering

AU - Gu, Lianhong

AU - Falge, Eva M.

AU - Boden, Tom

AU - Baldocchi, Dennis D.

AU - Black, T. A.

AU - Saleska, Scott

AU - Suni, Tanja

AU - Verma, Shashi B.

AU - Vesala, Timo

AU - Wofsy, Steve C.

AU - Xu, Liukang

PY - 2005/2/28

Y1 - 2005/2/28

N2 - We recommend an automated statistical method (Moving Point Test, or MPT) to determine the friction velocity (u*) thresholds in nighttime eddy flux filtering. Our intention is to make the determination of the u* thresholds objective and reproducible and to keep flux treatment consistent over time and across sites. In developing the MPT method, we recognize that both ecosystem respiration and u* exhibit diurnal and seasonal cycles and there are potential correlative changes between them, which must be removed before u* can be used as a filter criterion. MPT uses an iterative approach to simultaneously determine a valid temperature response function, which is used to normalize nighttime flux measurements, and identify u* thresholds based on the normalized fluxes. Tests show that MPT works well for a variety of scenarios and vegetation types. We also recommend that in order to increase the reliability of nighttime flux filters, a detailed measurement of mean CO 2 concentration profiles need to be employed to calculate canopy storage changes accurately. Preferably, multiple profiles at different locations within the nighttime flux footprint should be used so that volume-averaged storage changes can be made. In addition, efforts should be made to minimize measurement gaps in summer nights as much as possible because of the short-time duration and frequent calm conditions, which greatly limit the amount of reliable data. We emphasize that the MPT method is not meant to be a final solution to the nighttime flux issue. Continuous theoretical and experimental researches are still needed to overcome the challenges in measuring nighttime fluxes accurately.

AB - We recommend an automated statistical method (Moving Point Test, or MPT) to determine the friction velocity (u*) thresholds in nighttime eddy flux filtering. Our intention is to make the determination of the u* thresholds objective and reproducible and to keep flux treatment consistent over time and across sites. In developing the MPT method, we recognize that both ecosystem respiration and u* exhibit diurnal and seasonal cycles and there are potential correlative changes between them, which must be removed before u* can be used as a filter criterion. MPT uses an iterative approach to simultaneously determine a valid temperature response function, which is used to normalize nighttime flux measurements, and identify u* thresholds based on the normalized fluxes. Tests show that MPT works well for a variety of scenarios and vegetation types. We also recommend that in order to increase the reliability of nighttime flux filters, a detailed measurement of mean CO 2 concentration profiles need to be employed to calculate canopy storage changes accurately. Preferably, multiple profiles at different locations within the nighttime flux footprint should be used so that volume-averaged storage changes can be made. In addition, efforts should be made to minimize measurement gaps in summer nights as much as possible because of the short-time duration and frequent calm conditions, which greatly limit the amount of reliable data. We emphasize that the MPT method is not meant to be a final solution to the nighttime flux issue. Continuous theoretical and experimental researches are still needed to overcome the challenges in measuring nighttime fluxes accurately.

KW - Eddy covariance

KW - Fluxes

KW - Friction velocity

KW - Moving point test

KW - Net ecosystem exchange

KW - Turbulence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19944430785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19944430785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:19944430785

VL - 128

SP - 179

EP - 197

JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

SN - 0168-1923

IS - 3-4

ER -