Observational evaluation of compliance with traffic regulations among helmeted and nonhelmeted bicyclists

C. Farris, Daniel W Spaite, E. A. Criss, T. D. Velenzuela, H. W. Maislin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: To evaluate whether helmeted bicyclists are more compliant with traffic regulations than nonhelmeted bicyclists. Methods: This prospective observational study, using a convenience sample, was conducted during daylight hours at three separate intersections, marked with legal stop signs, near the campus of a major university. Data collected included helmet use, legal hand signal use to indicate a turn or stop, and whether the bicyclist came to a complete stop before proceeding through the intersection. Results: A total of 1,793 bicyclists were evaluated. Only 8.8% of the bicycle riders were wearing helmets. Helmeted bicyclists were 2.6 times more likely than nonhelmeted bicyclists to make legal stops (P<.000001; odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.6). They were also 7.1 times mere likely to use hand signals (P<.000001; OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 2.8 to 18.2). Conclusion: Helmeted bicycle riders showed a significantly greater compliance with two traffic laws than nonhelmeted bicyclists. They were 2.6 times more likely to stop at stop signs and 7.1 times more likely to use legal hand signals. This very strong association of helmet use with safer riding habits has implications for injury-control efforts aimed at preventing bicycle-related injuries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)625-629
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume29
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Head Protective Devices
Hand
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Wounds and Injuries
Habits
Observational Studies
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Observational evaluation of compliance with traffic regulations among helmeted and nonhelmeted bicyclists. / Farris, C.; Spaite, Daniel W; Criss, E. A.; Velenzuela, T. D.; Maislin, H. W.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 5, 1997, p. 625-629.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farris, C. ; Spaite, Daniel W ; Criss, E. A. ; Velenzuela, T. D. ; Maislin, H. W. / Observational evaluation of compliance with traffic regulations among helmeted and nonhelmeted bicyclists. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 625-629.
@article{99782b9f13654d5ca0bb8c4f1dbb540f,
title = "Observational evaluation of compliance with traffic regulations among helmeted and nonhelmeted bicyclists",
abstract = "Study objective: To evaluate whether helmeted bicyclists are more compliant with traffic regulations than nonhelmeted bicyclists. Methods: This prospective observational study, using a convenience sample, was conducted during daylight hours at three separate intersections, marked with legal stop signs, near the campus of a major university. Data collected included helmet use, legal hand signal use to indicate a turn or stop, and whether the bicyclist came to a complete stop before proceeding through the intersection. Results: A total of 1,793 bicyclists were evaluated. Only 8.8{\%} of the bicycle riders were wearing helmets. Helmeted bicyclists were 2.6 times more likely than nonhelmeted bicyclists to make legal stops (P<.000001; odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.6). They were also 7.1 times mere likely to use hand signals (P<.000001; OR, 7.2; 95{\%} CI, 2.8 to 18.2). Conclusion: Helmeted bicycle riders showed a significantly greater compliance with two traffic laws than nonhelmeted bicyclists. They were 2.6 times more likely to stop at stop signs and 7.1 times more likely to use legal hand signals. This very strong association of helmet use with safer riding habits has implications for injury-control efforts aimed at preventing bicycle-related injuries.",
author = "C. Farris and Spaite, {Daniel W} and Criss, {E. A.} and Velenzuela, {T. D.} and Maislin, {H. W.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "625--629",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observational evaluation of compliance with traffic regulations among helmeted and nonhelmeted bicyclists

AU - Farris, C.

AU - Spaite, Daniel W

AU - Criss, E. A.

AU - Velenzuela, T. D.

AU - Maislin, H. W.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Study objective: To evaluate whether helmeted bicyclists are more compliant with traffic regulations than nonhelmeted bicyclists. Methods: This prospective observational study, using a convenience sample, was conducted during daylight hours at three separate intersections, marked with legal stop signs, near the campus of a major university. Data collected included helmet use, legal hand signal use to indicate a turn or stop, and whether the bicyclist came to a complete stop before proceeding through the intersection. Results: A total of 1,793 bicyclists were evaluated. Only 8.8% of the bicycle riders were wearing helmets. Helmeted bicyclists were 2.6 times more likely than nonhelmeted bicyclists to make legal stops (P<.000001; odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.6). They were also 7.1 times mere likely to use hand signals (P<.000001; OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 2.8 to 18.2). Conclusion: Helmeted bicycle riders showed a significantly greater compliance with two traffic laws than nonhelmeted bicyclists. They were 2.6 times more likely to stop at stop signs and 7.1 times more likely to use legal hand signals. This very strong association of helmet use with safer riding habits has implications for injury-control efforts aimed at preventing bicycle-related injuries.

AB - Study objective: To evaluate whether helmeted bicyclists are more compliant with traffic regulations than nonhelmeted bicyclists. Methods: This prospective observational study, using a convenience sample, was conducted during daylight hours at three separate intersections, marked with legal stop signs, near the campus of a major university. Data collected included helmet use, legal hand signal use to indicate a turn or stop, and whether the bicyclist came to a complete stop before proceeding through the intersection. Results: A total of 1,793 bicyclists were evaluated. Only 8.8% of the bicycle riders were wearing helmets. Helmeted bicyclists were 2.6 times more likely than nonhelmeted bicyclists to make legal stops (P<.000001; odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.6). They were also 7.1 times mere likely to use hand signals (P<.000001; OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 2.8 to 18.2). Conclusion: Helmeted bicycle riders showed a significantly greater compliance with two traffic laws than nonhelmeted bicyclists. They were 2.6 times more likely to stop at stop signs and 7.1 times more likely to use legal hand signals. This very strong association of helmet use with safer riding habits has implications for injury-control efforts aimed at preventing bicycle-related injuries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030906135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030906135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 625

EP - 629

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 5

ER -