Observations

William J Jacobs, James R. Blackburn, M. Buttrick, Timothy J. Harpur, D. Kennedy, Michael J. Mana, M. A. MacDonald, Leslie M. McPherson, Dennis Paul, James G. Pfaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A basic assumption of the behavioral sciences is that there exists a direct, self-evident relationship between the behavioral categories, or types, used to describe behavior and how the organism actually behaves. This assumption is challenged. It appears that behavioral types are typically created a priori, either with an eye to convenience of measurement or on the basis of anthropomorphic or intuitive inferences. Furthermore, it appears that human observers do not record behavioral types accurately or consistently. The elementary units, or tokens, of behavior are not recorded and, therefore, play no explicit role in the creation of the types used to describe behavior. It is suggested that behavior be described explicitly through the use of formal notation systems. This suggestion is supported by a review of studies that have used such systems to reveal striking new insights into the organization of behavior. Of these systems, Eshkol-Wachman Movement Notation appears exceptionally powerful for extracting invariant features of behavior. We suggest that the adoption of such methods will lead to behavioral taxonomies that are both ecologically and neurologically valid.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-19
Number of pages17
JournalPsychobiology
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Behavioral Sciences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Jacobs, W. J., Blackburn, J. R., Buttrick, M., Harpur, T. J., Kennedy, D., Mana, M. J., ... Pfaus, J. G. (1988). Observations. Psychobiology, 16(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327295

Observations. / Jacobs, William J; Blackburn, James R.; Buttrick, M.; Harpur, Timothy J.; Kennedy, D.; Mana, Michael J.; MacDonald, M. A.; McPherson, Leslie M.; Paul, Dennis; Pfaus, James G.

In: Psychobiology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1988, p. 3-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jacobs, WJ, Blackburn, JR, Buttrick, M, Harpur, TJ, Kennedy, D, Mana, MJ, MacDonald, MA, McPherson, LM, Paul, D & Pfaus, JG 1988, 'Observations', Psychobiology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327295
Jacobs WJ, Blackburn JR, Buttrick M, Harpur TJ, Kennedy D, Mana MJ et al. Observations. Psychobiology. 1988;16(1):3-19. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327295
Jacobs, William J ; Blackburn, James R. ; Buttrick, M. ; Harpur, Timothy J. ; Kennedy, D. ; Mana, Michael J. ; MacDonald, M. A. ; McPherson, Leslie M. ; Paul, Dennis ; Pfaus, James G. / Observations. In: Psychobiology. 1988 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 3-19.
@article{791536312821447d960bda27c0d82fa3,
title = "Observations",
abstract = "A basic assumption of the behavioral sciences is that there exists a direct, self-evident relationship between the behavioral categories, or types, used to describe behavior and how the organism actually behaves. This assumption is challenged. It appears that behavioral types are typically created a priori, either with an eye to convenience of measurement or on the basis of anthropomorphic or intuitive inferences. Furthermore, it appears that human observers do not record behavioral types accurately or consistently. The elementary units, or tokens, of behavior are not recorded and, therefore, play no explicit role in the creation of the types used to describe behavior. It is suggested that behavior be described explicitly through the use of formal notation systems. This suggestion is supported by a review of studies that have used such systems to reveal striking new insights into the organization of behavior. Of these systems, Eshkol-Wachman Movement Notation appears exceptionally powerful for extracting invariant features of behavior. We suggest that the adoption of such methods will lead to behavioral taxonomies that are both ecologically and neurologically valid.",
author = "Jacobs, {William J} and Blackburn, {James R.} and M. Buttrick and Harpur, {Timothy J.} and D. Kennedy and Mana, {Michael J.} and MacDonald, {M. A.} and McPherson, {Leslie M.} and Dennis Paul and Pfaus, {James G.}",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.3758/BF03327295",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "3--19",
journal = "Psychobiology",
issn = "0889-6313",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observations

AU - Jacobs, William J

AU - Blackburn, James R.

AU - Buttrick, M.

AU - Harpur, Timothy J.

AU - Kennedy, D.

AU - Mana, Michael J.

AU - MacDonald, M. A.

AU - McPherson, Leslie M.

AU - Paul, Dennis

AU - Pfaus, James G.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - A basic assumption of the behavioral sciences is that there exists a direct, self-evident relationship between the behavioral categories, or types, used to describe behavior and how the organism actually behaves. This assumption is challenged. It appears that behavioral types are typically created a priori, either with an eye to convenience of measurement or on the basis of anthropomorphic or intuitive inferences. Furthermore, it appears that human observers do not record behavioral types accurately or consistently. The elementary units, or tokens, of behavior are not recorded and, therefore, play no explicit role in the creation of the types used to describe behavior. It is suggested that behavior be described explicitly through the use of formal notation systems. This suggestion is supported by a review of studies that have used such systems to reveal striking new insights into the organization of behavior. Of these systems, Eshkol-Wachman Movement Notation appears exceptionally powerful for extracting invariant features of behavior. We suggest that the adoption of such methods will lead to behavioral taxonomies that are both ecologically and neurologically valid.

AB - A basic assumption of the behavioral sciences is that there exists a direct, self-evident relationship between the behavioral categories, or types, used to describe behavior and how the organism actually behaves. This assumption is challenged. It appears that behavioral types are typically created a priori, either with an eye to convenience of measurement or on the basis of anthropomorphic or intuitive inferences. Furthermore, it appears that human observers do not record behavioral types accurately or consistently. The elementary units, or tokens, of behavior are not recorded and, therefore, play no explicit role in the creation of the types used to describe behavior. It is suggested that behavior be described explicitly through the use of formal notation systems. This suggestion is supported by a review of studies that have used such systems to reveal striking new insights into the organization of behavior. Of these systems, Eshkol-Wachman Movement Notation appears exceptionally powerful for extracting invariant features of behavior. We suggest that the adoption of such methods will lead to behavioral taxonomies that are both ecologically and neurologically valid.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002521551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002521551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03327295

DO - 10.3758/BF03327295

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 3

EP - 19

JO - Psychobiology

JF - Psychobiology

SN - 0889-6313

IS - 1

ER -