Office rent premiums with respect to light rail transit stations: Case study of Dallas, Texas, with implications for planning of transit-oriented development

Arthur Christian Nelson, Dejan Eskic, Shima Hamidi, Susan J. Petheram, Reid Ewing, Jenny H. Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It seems an article of faith that because ridership catchment receives the largest share of riders within the first 0.5 mi (0.80 km), the design of transit-oriented development should be limited to 0.5 mi (0.80 km). But design of transit-oriented development requires another consideration: how the commercial real estate market responds. Unfortunately, much of the research into the commercial real estate value or rent premiums associated with transit station proximity is designed to reinforce the 0.5-mi (0.80 km) presumption. This paper reviews the literature and implications of ridership studies and research into commercial value and rent premiums with respect to distance from a transit station. The paper then reports research into transit station-related office rent premiums in the Dallas, Texas, metropolitan area. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the largest of its type undertaken on this question. Among the findings are that the premium extends 1.85 mi (2.98 km) from transit stations, with 25% of the premium-not a trivial amount- existing to 0.93 mi (1.50 km), with higher shares closer to the stations. The paper offers a reconsideration of both worker-based ridership and research on commercial real estate premiums to suggest that planning areas for transit-oriented development may extend beyond 0.5 mi (0.80 km), perhaps to 1 mi (1.61 km).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)110-115
Number of pages6
JournalTransportation Research Record
Volume2500
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Light rail transit
Planning
Catchments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Office rent premiums with respect to light rail transit stations : Case study of Dallas, Texas, with implications for planning of transit-oriented development. / Nelson, Arthur Christian; Eskic, Dejan; Hamidi, Shima; Petheram, Susan J.; Ewing, Reid; Liu, Jenny H.

In: Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2500, 2015, p. 110-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b1523312c904d4ea8ae34f1522484e8,
title = "Office rent premiums with respect to light rail transit stations: Case study of Dallas, Texas, with implications for planning of transit-oriented development",
abstract = "It seems an article of faith that because ridership catchment receives the largest share of riders within the first 0.5 mi (0.80 km), the design of transit-oriented development should be limited to 0.5 mi (0.80 km). But design of transit-oriented development requires another consideration: how the commercial real estate market responds. Unfortunately, much of the research into the commercial real estate value or rent premiums associated with transit station proximity is designed to reinforce the 0.5-mi (0.80 km) presumption. This paper reviews the literature and implications of ridership studies and research into commercial value and rent premiums with respect to distance from a transit station. The paper then reports research into transit station-related office rent premiums in the Dallas, Texas, metropolitan area. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the largest of its type undertaken on this question. Among the findings are that the premium extends 1.85 mi (2.98 km) from transit stations, with 25{\%} of the premium-not a trivial amount- existing to 0.93 mi (1.50 km), with higher shares closer to the stations. The paper offers a reconsideration of both worker-based ridership and research on commercial real estate premiums to suggest that planning areas for transit-oriented development may extend beyond 0.5 mi (0.80 km), perhaps to 1 mi (1.61 km).",
author = "Nelson, {Arthur Christian} and Dejan Eskic and Shima Hamidi and Petheram, {Susan J.} and Reid Ewing and Liu, {Jenny H.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3141/2500-13",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2500",
pages = "110--115",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Office rent premiums with respect to light rail transit stations

T2 - Case study of Dallas, Texas, with implications for planning of transit-oriented development

AU - Nelson, Arthur Christian

AU - Eskic, Dejan

AU - Hamidi, Shima

AU - Petheram, Susan J.

AU - Ewing, Reid

AU - Liu, Jenny H.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - It seems an article of faith that because ridership catchment receives the largest share of riders within the first 0.5 mi (0.80 km), the design of transit-oriented development should be limited to 0.5 mi (0.80 km). But design of transit-oriented development requires another consideration: how the commercial real estate market responds. Unfortunately, much of the research into the commercial real estate value or rent premiums associated with transit station proximity is designed to reinforce the 0.5-mi (0.80 km) presumption. This paper reviews the literature and implications of ridership studies and research into commercial value and rent premiums with respect to distance from a transit station. The paper then reports research into transit station-related office rent premiums in the Dallas, Texas, metropolitan area. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the largest of its type undertaken on this question. Among the findings are that the premium extends 1.85 mi (2.98 km) from transit stations, with 25% of the premium-not a trivial amount- existing to 0.93 mi (1.50 km), with higher shares closer to the stations. The paper offers a reconsideration of both worker-based ridership and research on commercial real estate premiums to suggest that planning areas for transit-oriented development may extend beyond 0.5 mi (0.80 km), perhaps to 1 mi (1.61 km).

AB - It seems an article of faith that because ridership catchment receives the largest share of riders within the first 0.5 mi (0.80 km), the design of transit-oriented development should be limited to 0.5 mi (0.80 km). But design of transit-oriented development requires another consideration: how the commercial real estate market responds. Unfortunately, much of the research into the commercial real estate value or rent premiums associated with transit station proximity is designed to reinforce the 0.5-mi (0.80 km) presumption. This paper reviews the literature and implications of ridership studies and research into commercial value and rent premiums with respect to distance from a transit station. The paper then reports research into transit station-related office rent premiums in the Dallas, Texas, metropolitan area. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the largest of its type undertaken on this question. Among the findings are that the premium extends 1.85 mi (2.98 km) from transit stations, with 25% of the premium-not a trivial amount- existing to 0.93 mi (1.50 km), with higher shares closer to the stations. The paper offers a reconsideration of both worker-based ridership and research on commercial real estate premiums to suggest that planning areas for transit-oriented development may extend beyond 0.5 mi (0.80 km), perhaps to 1 mi (1.61 km).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976497866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976497866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3141/2500-13

DO - 10.3141/2500-13

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84976497866

VL - 2500

SP - 110

EP - 115

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

ER -