On cognitive constraints and learning progressions: The case of "structure of matter"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on the analysis of available research on students' alternative conceptions about the particulate nature of matter, we identified basic implicit assumptions that seem to constrain students' ideas and reasoning on this topic at various learning stages. Although many of these assumptions are interrelated, some of them seem to change or lose/gain strength independently from one another. Overlapping or competing presuppositions about the structure, properties, and dynamics of matter may be able to coexist at any given level, particularly at intermediate stages of expertise. Our results allowed us to suggest common paths in the transition from naïve through novice to expert along relevant dimensions related to the structure and properties of chemical substances. The identification of these cognitive constraints provides a useful framework that educators can use to better understand and even predict many of their students' learning difficulties. It can also assist in the design and organisation of learning experiences and assessment tools that recognise and take advantage of the most likely trajectories towards expertise (learning progressions) followed by many students.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2123-2136
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume31
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

learning
expertise
student
ownership structure
learning disorder
expert
educator
experience

Keywords

  • Alternative conception
  • Assessment
  • Chemistry education
  • Cognitive constraints
  • Conceptual development
  • Learning
  • Learning progressions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

On cognitive constraints and learning progressions : The case of "structure of matter". / Talanquer, Vicente A.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 31, No. 15, 10.2009, p. 2123-2136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2baa4305755444c09a335798f636e7bb,
title = "On cognitive constraints and learning progressions: The case of {"}structure of matter{"}",
abstract = "Based on the analysis of available research on students' alternative conceptions about the particulate nature of matter, we identified basic implicit assumptions that seem to constrain students' ideas and reasoning on this topic at various learning stages. Although many of these assumptions are interrelated, some of them seem to change or lose/gain strength independently from one another. Overlapping or competing presuppositions about the structure, properties, and dynamics of matter may be able to coexist at any given level, particularly at intermediate stages of expertise. Our results allowed us to suggest common paths in the transition from na{\"i}ve through novice to expert along relevant dimensions related to the structure and properties of chemical substances. The identification of these cognitive constraints provides a useful framework that educators can use to better understand and even predict many of their students' learning difficulties. It can also assist in the design and organisation of learning experiences and assessment tools that recognise and take advantage of the most likely trajectories towards expertise (learning progressions) followed by many students.",
keywords = "Alternative conception, Assessment, Chemistry education, Cognitive constraints, Conceptual development, Learning, Learning progressions",
author = "Talanquer, {Vicente A}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/09500690802578025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "2123--2136",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On cognitive constraints and learning progressions

T2 - The case of "structure of matter"

AU - Talanquer, Vicente A

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Based on the analysis of available research on students' alternative conceptions about the particulate nature of matter, we identified basic implicit assumptions that seem to constrain students' ideas and reasoning on this topic at various learning stages. Although many of these assumptions are interrelated, some of them seem to change or lose/gain strength independently from one another. Overlapping or competing presuppositions about the structure, properties, and dynamics of matter may be able to coexist at any given level, particularly at intermediate stages of expertise. Our results allowed us to suggest common paths in the transition from naïve through novice to expert along relevant dimensions related to the structure and properties of chemical substances. The identification of these cognitive constraints provides a useful framework that educators can use to better understand and even predict many of their students' learning difficulties. It can also assist in the design and organisation of learning experiences and assessment tools that recognise and take advantage of the most likely trajectories towards expertise (learning progressions) followed by many students.

AB - Based on the analysis of available research on students' alternative conceptions about the particulate nature of matter, we identified basic implicit assumptions that seem to constrain students' ideas and reasoning on this topic at various learning stages. Although many of these assumptions are interrelated, some of them seem to change or lose/gain strength independently from one another. Overlapping or competing presuppositions about the structure, properties, and dynamics of matter may be able to coexist at any given level, particularly at intermediate stages of expertise. Our results allowed us to suggest common paths in the transition from naïve through novice to expert along relevant dimensions related to the structure and properties of chemical substances. The identification of these cognitive constraints provides a useful framework that educators can use to better understand and even predict many of their students' learning difficulties. It can also assist in the design and organisation of learning experiences and assessment tools that recognise and take advantage of the most likely trajectories towards expertise (learning progressions) followed by many students.

KW - Alternative conception

KW - Assessment

KW - Chemistry education

KW - Cognitive constraints

KW - Conceptual development

KW - Learning

KW - Learning progressions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449598363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449598363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500690802578025

DO - 10.1080/09500690802578025

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70449598363

VL - 31

SP - 2123

EP - 2136

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 15

ER -