On increasing the quality, reliability, and rigor of wildlife science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Memorized definitions of science and recipes for quantitative analyses are no substitute for critical thinking in wildlife science. Inadequately understanding the philosophy of science and the principles of sampling and experimental design, not appreciating the differences between research hypotheses and statistical hypotheses, and between biological and statistical significance, and not viewing research questions within the context of ecological processes limit the quality of research efforts in wildlife science. Increasing conceptual understanding of these issues will help wildlife scientists, managers, and students develop the powerful tools necessary for creative, critical thinking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)518-521
Number of pages4
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume28
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

wildlife
managers
students
experimental design
student
science
sampling

Keywords

  • Adaptive management
  • Experimental design
  • Graduate education
  • Hypothesis testing
  • Sampling design
  • Science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology

Cite this

On increasing the quality, reliability, and rigor of wildlife science. / Steidl, Robert J; DeStefano, S.; Matter, William J.

In: Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2000, p. 518-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8f5c9787a4524bf886c577feb3308080,
title = "On increasing the quality, reliability, and rigor of wildlife science",
abstract = "Memorized definitions of science and recipes for quantitative analyses are no substitute for critical thinking in wildlife science. Inadequately understanding the philosophy of science and the principles of sampling and experimental design, not appreciating the differences between research hypotheses and statistical hypotheses, and between biological and statistical significance, and not viewing research questions within the context of ecological processes limit the quality of research efforts in wildlife science. Increasing conceptual understanding of these issues will help wildlife scientists, managers, and students develop the powerful tools necessary for creative, critical thinking.",
keywords = "Adaptive management, Experimental design, Graduate education, Hypothesis testing, Sampling design, Science",
author = "Steidl, {Robert J} and S. DeStefano and Matter, {William J}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "518--521",
journal = "Wildlife Society Bulletin",
issn = "0091-7648",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On increasing the quality, reliability, and rigor of wildlife science

AU - Steidl, Robert J

AU - DeStefano, S.

AU - Matter, William J

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Memorized definitions of science and recipes for quantitative analyses are no substitute for critical thinking in wildlife science. Inadequately understanding the philosophy of science and the principles of sampling and experimental design, not appreciating the differences between research hypotheses and statistical hypotheses, and between biological and statistical significance, and not viewing research questions within the context of ecological processes limit the quality of research efforts in wildlife science. Increasing conceptual understanding of these issues will help wildlife scientists, managers, and students develop the powerful tools necessary for creative, critical thinking.

AB - Memorized definitions of science and recipes for quantitative analyses are no substitute for critical thinking in wildlife science. Inadequately understanding the philosophy of science and the principles of sampling and experimental design, not appreciating the differences between research hypotheses and statistical hypotheses, and between biological and statistical significance, and not viewing research questions within the context of ecological processes limit the quality of research efforts in wildlife science. Increasing conceptual understanding of these issues will help wildlife scientists, managers, and students develop the powerful tools necessary for creative, critical thinking.

KW - Adaptive management

KW - Experimental design

KW - Graduate education

KW - Hypothesis testing

KW - Sampling design

KW - Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033662394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033662394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 518

EP - 521

JO - Wildlife Society Bulletin

JF - Wildlife Society Bulletin

SN - 0091-7648

IS - 3

ER -