On recent claims concerning the Rh = ct Universe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Rh = ct universe is a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology which, like Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM), assumes the presence of dark energy in addition to (baryonic and non-luminous) matter and radiation. Unlike ΛCDM, however, it is also constrained by the equation of state (EOS) p=-ρ/3, in terms of the total pressure p and energy density ρ. Oneon- one comparative tests between Rh = ct and ΛCDM have been carried out using over 14 different cosmological measurements and observations. In every case, the data have favoured Rh = ct over the standard model, with model selection tools yielding a likelihood ~90- 95 per cent that the former is correct, versus only ~5-10 per cent for the latter. In other words, the standard model without the EOS p=-ρ/3 does not appear to be the optimal description of nature. Yet in spite of these successes - or perhaps because of them - several concerns have been published recently regarding the fundamental basis of the theory itself. The latest paper on this subject even claims - quite remarkably - that Rh = ct is a vacuum solution, though quite evidently ρ ≠ 0. Here, we address these concerns and demonstrate that all criticisms levelled thus far against Rh = ct, including the supposed vacuum condition, are unwarranted. They all appear to be based on incorrect assumptions or basic theoretical errors. Nevertheless, continued scrutiny such as this will be critical to establishing Rh = ct as the correct description of nature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1191-1194
Number of pages4
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume446
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

dark matter
universe
equations of state
equation of state
vacuum
dark energy
cosmology
flux density
energy
radiation
cold

Keywords

  • Cosmological parameters
  • Cosmology: observations
  • Cosmology: theory
  • Gravitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

On recent claims concerning the Rh = ct Universe. / Melia, Fulvio.

In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 446, No. 2, 2014, p. 1191-1194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1880bc28884406088aa374395c5feeb,
title = "On recent claims concerning the Rh = ct Universe",
abstract = "The Rh = ct universe is a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology which, like Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM), assumes the presence of dark energy in addition to (baryonic and non-luminous) matter and radiation. Unlike ΛCDM, however, it is also constrained by the equation of state (EOS) p=-ρ/3, in terms of the total pressure p and energy density ρ. Oneon- one comparative tests between Rh = ct and ΛCDM have been carried out using over 14 different cosmological measurements and observations. In every case, the data have favoured Rh = ct over the standard model, with model selection tools yielding a likelihood ~90- 95 per cent that the former is correct, versus only ~5-10 per cent for the latter. In other words, the standard model without the EOS p=-ρ/3 does not appear to be the optimal description of nature. Yet in spite of these successes - or perhaps because of them - several concerns have been published recently regarding the fundamental basis of the theory itself. The latest paper on this subject even claims - quite remarkably - that Rh = ct is a vacuum solution, though quite evidently ρ ≠ 0. Here, we address these concerns and demonstrate that all criticisms levelled thus far against Rh = ct, including the supposed vacuum condition, are unwarranted. They all appear to be based on incorrect assumptions or basic theoretical errors. Nevertheless, continued scrutiny such as this will be critical to establishing Rh = ct as the correct description of nature.",
keywords = "Cosmological parameters, Cosmology: observations, Cosmology: theory, Gravitation",
author = "Fulvio Melia",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1093/mnras/stu2181",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "446",
pages = "1191--1194",
journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",
issn = "0035-8711",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On recent claims concerning the Rh = ct Universe

AU - Melia, Fulvio

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The Rh = ct universe is a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology which, like Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM), assumes the presence of dark energy in addition to (baryonic and non-luminous) matter and radiation. Unlike ΛCDM, however, it is also constrained by the equation of state (EOS) p=-ρ/3, in terms of the total pressure p and energy density ρ. Oneon- one comparative tests between Rh = ct and ΛCDM have been carried out using over 14 different cosmological measurements and observations. In every case, the data have favoured Rh = ct over the standard model, with model selection tools yielding a likelihood ~90- 95 per cent that the former is correct, versus only ~5-10 per cent for the latter. In other words, the standard model without the EOS p=-ρ/3 does not appear to be the optimal description of nature. Yet in spite of these successes - or perhaps because of them - several concerns have been published recently regarding the fundamental basis of the theory itself. The latest paper on this subject even claims - quite remarkably - that Rh = ct is a vacuum solution, though quite evidently ρ ≠ 0. Here, we address these concerns and demonstrate that all criticisms levelled thus far against Rh = ct, including the supposed vacuum condition, are unwarranted. They all appear to be based on incorrect assumptions or basic theoretical errors. Nevertheless, continued scrutiny such as this will be critical to establishing Rh = ct as the correct description of nature.

AB - The Rh = ct universe is a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology which, like Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM), assumes the presence of dark energy in addition to (baryonic and non-luminous) matter and radiation. Unlike ΛCDM, however, it is also constrained by the equation of state (EOS) p=-ρ/3, in terms of the total pressure p and energy density ρ. Oneon- one comparative tests between Rh = ct and ΛCDM have been carried out using over 14 different cosmological measurements and observations. In every case, the data have favoured Rh = ct over the standard model, with model selection tools yielding a likelihood ~90- 95 per cent that the former is correct, versus only ~5-10 per cent for the latter. In other words, the standard model without the EOS p=-ρ/3 does not appear to be the optimal description of nature. Yet in spite of these successes - or perhaps because of them - several concerns have been published recently regarding the fundamental basis of the theory itself. The latest paper on this subject even claims - quite remarkably - that Rh = ct is a vacuum solution, though quite evidently ρ ≠ 0. Here, we address these concerns and demonstrate that all criticisms levelled thus far against Rh = ct, including the supposed vacuum condition, are unwarranted. They all appear to be based on incorrect assumptions or basic theoretical errors. Nevertheless, continued scrutiny such as this will be critical to establishing Rh = ct as the correct description of nature.

KW - Cosmological parameters

KW - Cosmology: observations

KW - Cosmology: theory

KW - Gravitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987933273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987933273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/mnras/stu2181

DO - 10.1093/mnras/stu2181

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84987933273

VL - 446

SP - 1191

EP - 1194

JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

SN - 0035-8711

IS - 2

ER -