Abstract
The relative effectiveness of blowing and suction in controlling separation and circulation is assessed in the present paper. The paper focuses on low momentum input where suction is much superior to blowing in generating lift and decreasing drag. Blowing is mostly deleterious at levels of input that result in the jet velocity being comparable to the free stream's velocity and this paper attempts to explain this effect. Furthermore, the significance of slot width, slot location and the bluntness of the trailing edge are discussed. The effectiveness of suction is generally improved by widening the slot, moving it downstream and reducing the bluntness of the trailing edge. The effectiveness of blowing is best realized when the slot is located near the natural separation point for the narrowest slot possible. There is a threshold input of momentum where blowing becomes more effective than suction. Most of the data presented was taken at incompressible speeds and at Re < 2.5*10 5.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference |
State | Published - 2010 |
Event | 40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference - Chicago, IL, United States Duration: Jun 28 2010 → Jul 1 2010 |
Other
Other | 40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference |
---|---|
Country | United States |
City | Chicago, IL |
Period | 6/28/10 → 7/1/10 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
Cite this
On the comparative effectiveness of steady blowing and suction used for separation and circulation control on an elliptical airfoil. / Chen, Chunmei; Seele, Roman; Wygnanski, Israel J.
40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. 2010. 2010-4715.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
}
TY - GEN
T1 - On the comparative effectiveness of steady blowing and suction used for separation and circulation control on an elliptical airfoil
AU - Chen, Chunmei
AU - Seele, Roman
AU - Wygnanski, Israel J
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The relative effectiveness of blowing and suction in controlling separation and circulation is assessed in the present paper. The paper focuses on low momentum input where suction is much superior to blowing in generating lift and decreasing drag. Blowing is mostly deleterious at levels of input that result in the jet velocity being comparable to the free stream's velocity and this paper attempts to explain this effect. Furthermore, the significance of slot width, slot location and the bluntness of the trailing edge are discussed. The effectiveness of suction is generally improved by widening the slot, moving it downstream and reducing the bluntness of the trailing edge. The effectiveness of blowing is best realized when the slot is located near the natural separation point for the narrowest slot possible. There is a threshold input of momentum where blowing becomes more effective than suction. Most of the data presented was taken at incompressible speeds and at Re < 2.5*10 5.
AB - The relative effectiveness of blowing and suction in controlling separation and circulation is assessed in the present paper. The paper focuses on low momentum input where suction is much superior to blowing in generating lift and decreasing drag. Blowing is mostly deleterious at levels of input that result in the jet velocity being comparable to the free stream's velocity and this paper attempts to explain this effect. Furthermore, the significance of slot width, slot location and the bluntness of the trailing edge are discussed. The effectiveness of suction is generally improved by widening the slot, moving it downstream and reducing the bluntness of the trailing edge. The effectiveness of blowing is best realized when the slot is located near the natural separation point for the narrowest slot possible. There is a threshold input of momentum where blowing becomes more effective than suction. Most of the data presented was taken at incompressible speeds and at Re < 2.5*10 5.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649485340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649485340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78649485340
SN - 9781617389221
BT - 40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference
ER -