On the development of regionalization relationships for lumped watershed models: The impact of ignoring sub-basin scale variability

Harald Kling, Hoshin Vijai Gupta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lumped precipitation-runoff models represent the watershed as a single, homogeneous unit, thereby ignoring spatial variability in forcing inputs and physical properties. In spite of this, spatially distributed models, which account for the variability of such factors, generally do not provide better simulations of catchment outlet runoff. This is at least in part because lumped models are easier to calibrate. However, it is often unclear whether the optimal (calibrated) parameters of a lumped model take on values that are consistent with underlying physical properties. In this study we explore the hypothesis that optimized lumped parameters are "contaminated" by noise due to the lumped representation of the watershed. We conduct a series of virtual experiments in which a daily time-step conceptual precipitation-runoff model is applied, with both lumped and distributed spatial discretizations, to 49 Austrian mesoscale basins. The experiments examine the impacts of different degrees of spatial variability in the inputs and physical properties, as well as varying complexity of the model structure. The usage of lumped models results in optimal parameters that include a considerable degree of noise, because the parameters implicitly compensate for the deficiencies in the spatial discretization. Most of the noise is attributable to neglecting the spatial variability in the physical properties, while the spatial variability of the inputs is of less importance. Further, the noise increases with system complexity, where parameter interactions significantly magnify the noise. This noise in the lumped parameters diminishes the correlation with catchment properties, even when a theoretically strong relationship exists, thereby complicating parameter regionalization as used, for example, for prediction in ungauged basins.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-351
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Hydrology
Volume373
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2009

Fingerprint

regionalization
watershed
basin
physical property
runoff
catchment
parameter
experiment
prediction
simulation

Keywords

  • Catchment properties
  • Distributed discretization
  • Lumped discretization
  • Precipitation-runoff models
  • Prediction in ungauged basins
  • Regionalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

On the development of regionalization relationships for lumped watershed models : The impact of ignoring sub-basin scale variability. / Kling, Harald; Gupta, Hoshin Vijai.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 373, No. 3-4, 15.07.2009, p. 337-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e7d24e6f96b451b8c8568faf3a5f832,
title = "On the development of regionalization relationships for lumped watershed models: The impact of ignoring sub-basin scale variability",
abstract = "Lumped precipitation-runoff models represent the watershed as a single, homogeneous unit, thereby ignoring spatial variability in forcing inputs and physical properties. In spite of this, spatially distributed models, which account for the variability of such factors, generally do not provide better simulations of catchment outlet runoff. This is at least in part because lumped models are easier to calibrate. However, it is often unclear whether the optimal (calibrated) parameters of a lumped model take on values that are consistent with underlying physical properties. In this study we explore the hypothesis that optimized lumped parameters are {"}contaminated{"} by noise due to the lumped representation of the watershed. We conduct a series of virtual experiments in which a daily time-step conceptual precipitation-runoff model is applied, with both lumped and distributed spatial discretizations, to 49 Austrian mesoscale basins. The experiments examine the impacts of different degrees of spatial variability in the inputs and physical properties, as well as varying complexity of the model structure. The usage of lumped models results in optimal parameters that include a considerable degree of noise, because the parameters implicitly compensate for the deficiencies in the spatial discretization. Most of the noise is attributable to neglecting the spatial variability in the physical properties, while the spatial variability of the inputs is of less importance. Further, the noise increases with system complexity, where parameter interactions significantly magnify the noise. This noise in the lumped parameters diminishes the correlation with catchment properties, even when a theoretically strong relationship exists, thereby complicating parameter regionalization as used, for example, for prediction in ungauged basins.",
keywords = "Catchment properties, Distributed discretization, Lumped discretization, Precipitation-runoff models, Prediction in ungauged basins, Regionalization",
author = "Harald Kling and Gupta, {Hoshin Vijai}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "373",
pages = "337--351",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the development of regionalization relationships for lumped watershed models

T2 - The impact of ignoring sub-basin scale variability

AU - Kling, Harald

AU - Gupta, Hoshin Vijai

PY - 2009/7/15

Y1 - 2009/7/15

N2 - Lumped precipitation-runoff models represent the watershed as a single, homogeneous unit, thereby ignoring spatial variability in forcing inputs and physical properties. In spite of this, spatially distributed models, which account for the variability of such factors, generally do not provide better simulations of catchment outlet runoff. This is at least in part because lumped models are easier to calibrate. However, it is often unclear whether the optimal (calibrated) parameters of a lumped model take on values that are consistent with underlying physical properties. In this study we explore the hypothesis that optimized lumped parameters are "contaminated" by noise due to the lumped representation of the watershed. We conduct a series of virtual experiments in which a daily time-step conceptual precipitation-runoff model is applied, with both lumped and distributed spatial discretizations, to 49 Austrian mesoscale basins. The experiments examine the impacts of different degrees of spatial variability in the inputs and physical properties, as well as varying complexity of the model structure. The usage of lumped models results in optimal parameters that include a considerable degree of noise, because the parameters implicitly compensate for the deficiencies in the spatial discretization. Most of the noise is attributable to neglecting the spatial variability in the physical properties, while the spatial variability of the inputs is of less importance. Further, the noise increases with system complexity, where parameter interactions significantly magnify the noise. This noise in the lumped parameters diminishes the correlation with catchment properties, even when a theoretically strong relationship exists, thereby complicating parameter regionalization as used, for example, for prediction in ungauged basins.

AB - Lumped precipitation-runoff models represent the watershed as a single, homogeneous unit, thereby ignoring spatial variability in forcing inputs and physical properties. In spite of this, spatially distributed models, which account for the variability of such factors, generally do not provide better simulations of catchment outlet runoff. This is at least in part because lumped models are easier to calibrate. However, it is often unclear whether the optimal (calibrated) parameters of a lumped model take on values that are consistent with underlying physical properties. In this study we explore the hypothesis that optimized lumped parameters are "contaminated" by noise due to the lumped representation of the watershed. We conduct a series of virtual experiments in which a daily time-step conceptual precipitation-runoff model is applied, with both lumped and distributed spatial discretizations, to 49 Austrian mesoscale basins. The experiments examine the impacts of different degrees of spatial variability in the inputs and physical properties, as well as varying complexity of the model structure. The usage of lumped models results in optimal parameters that include a considerable degree of noise, because the parameters implicitly compensate for the deficiencies in the spatial discretization. Most of the noise is attributable to neglecting the spatial variability in the physical properties, while the spatial variability of the inputs is of less importance. Further, the noise increases with system complexity, where parameter interactions significantly magnify the noise. This noise in the lumped parameters diminishes the correlation with catchment properties, even when a theoretically strong relationship exists, thereby complicating parameter regionalization as used, for example, for prediction in ungauged basins.

KW - Catchment properties

KW - Distributed discretization

KW - Lumped discretization

KW - Precipitation-runoff models

KW - Prediction in ungauged basins

KW - Regionalization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349302015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349302015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.031

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.031

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70349302015

VL - 373

SP - 337

EP - 351

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

IS - 3-4

ER -