On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Test of One Underlying Cognitive Mechanism

Terence Connolly, Robert L. Routhieaux, Sherry K. Schneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that group brainstorming, in its electronic form, can be an effective method of generating ideas, if the group is sufficiently large. We report here an experiment probing the mechanism underlying this good performance. Because larger groups are more likely than small ones to generate rare ideas, we hypothesized that rare ideas might be especially stimulating to further idea generation, and thus boost the performance of large, interacting groups. Experimental subjects working alone generated ideas while exposed to streams of either rare, common, or no stimulus ideas. No support for the hypothesized stimulating effect of rare ideas was found. We suggest several alternative mechanisms worth exploring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)490-503
Number of pages14
JournalSmall Group Research
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

On the effectiveness of group brainstorming : Test of One Underlying Cognitive Mechanism. / Connolly, Terence; Routhieaux, Robert L.; Schneider, Sherry K.

In: Small Group Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1993, p. 490-503.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Connolly, Terence ; Routhieaux, Robert L. ; Schneider, Sherry K. / On the effectiveness of group brainstorming : Test of One Underlying Cognitive Mechanism. In: Small Group Research. 1993 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 490-503.
@article{7b263773f3a7409cbdaf9c01385fceb8,
title = "On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Test of One Underlying Cognitive Mechanism",
abstract = "Recent studies suggest that group brainstorming, in its electronic form, can be an effective method of generating ideas, if the group is sufficiently large. We report here an experiment probing the mechanism underlying this good performance. Because larger groups are more likely than small ones to generate rare ideas, we hypothesized that rare ideas might be especially stimulating to further idea generation, and thus boost the performance of large, interacting groups. Experimental subjects working alone generated ideas while exposed to streams of either rare, common, or no stimulus ideas. No support for the hypothesized stimulating effect of rare ideas was found. We suggest several alternative mechanisms worth exploring.",
author = "Terence Connolly and Routhieaux, {Robert L.} and Schneider, {Sherry K.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1177/1046496493244004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "490--503",
journal = "Small Group Research",
issn = "1046-4964",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the effectiveness of group brainstorming

T2 - Test of One Underlying Cognitive Mechanism

AU - Connolly, Terence

AU - Routhieaux, Robert L.

AU - Schneider, Sherry K.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Recent studies suggest that group brainstorming, in its electronic form, can be an effective method of generating ideas, if the group is sufficiently large. We report here an experiment probing the mechanism underlying this good performance. Because larger groups are more likely than small ones to generate rare ideas, we hypothesized that rare ideas might be especially stimulating to further idea generation, and thus boost the performance of large, interacting groups. Experimental subjects working alone generated ideas while exposed to streams of either rare, common, or no stimulus ideas. No support for the hypothesized stimulating effect of rare ideas was found. We suggest several alternative mechanisms worth exploring.

AB - Recent studies suggest that group brainstorming, in its electronic form, can be an effective method of generating ideas, if the group is sufficiently large. We report here an experiment probing the mechanism underlying this good performance. Because larger groups are more likely than small ones to generate rare ideas, we hypothesized that rare ideas might be especially stimulating to further idea generation, and thus boost the performance of large, interacting groups. Experimental subjects working alone generated ideas while exposed to streams of either rare, common, or no stimulus ideas. No support for the hypothesized stimulating effect of rare ideas was found. We suggest several alternative mechanisms worth exploring.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344479587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21344479587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1046496493244004

DO - 10.1177/1046496493244004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21344479587

VL - 24

SP - 490

EP - 503

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

SN - 1046-4964

IS - 4

ER -