Open versus closed primaries and the ideological composition of presidential primary electorates

Barbara Norrander, Jay Wendland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many journalists, political reformers and social scientists assume that electorates in open versus closed primaries are distinctive, especially in terms of their ideological orientations. Because voting in closed primaries is restricted to registered partisans, voters in this setting are assumed to be more ideologically extreme. Independents voting in open primaries are seen as moderating the ideological orientation of these primary electorates. However, our research demonstrates that the ideological orientations of voters in these two primary settings are quite similar. Prior research demonstrates the influence of primary laws on voters' self-identifications as partisans or independents. We expand upon this research to show how this influences the number and ideological positions of partisans and independents as they vote in presidential primaries held under differing participation rules.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-236
Number of pages8
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume42
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

voting
political scientist
social scientist
journalist
voter
participation
Law

Keywords

  • Closed primaries
  • Ideology
  • Open primaries
  • Party identification
  • Presidential primaries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Open versus closed primaries and the ideological composition of presidential primary electorates. / Norrander, Barbara; Wendland, Jay.

In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 42, 01.06.2016, p. 229-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce3285bb825347cca97f75ba76c18964,
title = "Open versus closed primaries and the ideological composition of presidential primary electorates",
abstract = "Many journalists, political reformers and social scientists assume that electorates in open versus closed primaries are distinctive, especially in terms of their ideological orientations. Because voting in closed primaries is restricted to registered partisans, voters in this setting are assumed to be more ideologically extreme. Independents voting in open primaries are seen as moderating the ideological orientation of these primary electorates. However, our research demonstrates that the ideological orientations of voters in these two primary settings are quite similar. Prior research demonstrates the influence of primary laws on voters' self-identifications as partisans or independents. We expand upon this research to show how this influences the number and ideological positions of partisans and independents as they vote in presidential primaries held under differing participation rules.",
keywords = "Closed primaries, Ideology, Open primaries, Party identification, Presidential primaries",
author = "Barbara Norrander and Jay Wendland",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "229--236",
journal = "Electoral Studies",
issn = "0261-3794",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open versus closed primaries and the ideological composition of presidential primary electorates

AU - Norrander, Barbara

AU - Wendland, Jay

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Many journalists, political reformers and social scientists assume that electorates in open versus closed primaries are distinctive, especially in terms of their ideological orientations. Because voting in closed primaries is restricted to registered partisans, voters in this setting are assumed to be more ideologically extreme. Independents voting in open primaries are seen as moderating the ideological orientation of these primary electorates. However, our research demonstrates that the ideological orientations of voters in these two primary settings are quite similar. Prior research demonstrates the influence of primary laws on voters' self-identifications as partisans or independents. We expand upon this research to show how this influences the number and ideological positions of partisans and independents as they vote in presidential primaries held under differing participation rules.

AB - Many journalists, political reformers and social scientists assume that electorates in open versus closed primaries are distinctive, especially in terms of their ideological orientations. Because voting in closed primaries is restricted to registered partisans, voters in this setting are assumed to be more ideologically extreme. Independents voting in open primaries are seen as moderating the ideological orientation of these primary electorates. However, our research demonstrates that the ideological orientations of voters in these two primary settings are quite similar. Prior research demonstrates the influence of primary laws on voters' self-identifications as partisans or independents. We expand upon this research to show how this influences the number and ideological positions of partisans and independents as they vote in presidential primaries held under differing participation rules.

KW - Closed primaries

KW - Ideology

KW - Open primaries

KW - Party identification

KW - Presidential primaries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962881984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962881984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962881984

VL - 42

SP - 229

EP - 236

JO - Electoral Studies

JF - Electoral Studies

SN - 0261-3794

ER -