Opportunities and barriers for endangered species conservation using payments for ecosystem services

Aaron M. Lien, Colleen Ulibarri, Wendy Vanasco, George B Ruyle, Scott Bonar, Laura López-Hoffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Endangered species laws seek to prevent extinction by outlawing actions that may cause harm or lead to extinction. In doing so, these laws are sometimes criticized for limiting management flexibility and subjecting landowners to regulatory burdens. One proposed solution to this challenge is development of payment for ecosystem service (PES) programs. These programs provide an economic incentive to conserve endangered species by compensating landowners for the costs of conservation or forgoing other profitable uses of land and resources. To assess the utility of PES as a means of overcoming opposition to endangered species regulations, we surveyed ranch operators in Arizona and New Mexico facing new regulations related to endangered jaguars (Panthera onca). Our findings suggest that PES cannot overcome the perceived burdens of species protection regulations and are unlikely to increase collaboration between landowners and government agencies. PES approaches are only likely to succeed where there is strong fit between institutional design and resource manager preferences. In the context of endangered species, PES proponents must pay particular attention to institutional arrangements that reduce concerns about regulatory risk. To this end, to effectively meet endangered species conservation goals, we recommend: 1) framing PES programs as voluntary conservation incentives, 2) focusing incentives on healthy ecosystems rather than a single species, and 3) using private funding to support incentives. Under these circumstances, PES may be an effective endangered species conservation tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-82
Number of pages9
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume232
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

species conservation
endangered species
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
landowners
landowner
Panthera onca
incentive
extinction
economic incentives
government agencies
ranching
resource
funding
managers
land use
ecosystems
ecosystem
cost
programme

Keywords

  • Endangered species
  • Jaguars
  • Payments for ecosystem services
  • Rangeland management
  • Wildlife conservation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Opportunities and barriers for endangered species conservation using payments for ecosystem services. / Lien, Aaron M.; Ulibarri, Colleen; Vanasco, Wendy; Ruyle, George B; Bonar, Scott; López-Hoffman, Laura.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 232, 01.04.2019, p. 74-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b334c337105f4c36950f7e9653203482,
title = "Opportunities and barriers for endangered species conservation using payments for ecosystem services",
abstract = "Endangered species laws seek to prevent extinction by outlawing actions that may cause harm or lead to extinction. In doing so, these laws are sometimes criticized for limiting management flexibility and subjecting landowners to regulatory burdens. One proposed solution to this challenge is development of payment for ecosystem service (PES) programs. These programs provide an economic incentive to conserve endangered species by compensating landowners for the costs of conservation or forgoing other profitable uses of land and resources. To assess the utility of PES as a means of overcoming opposition to endangered species regulations, we surveyed ranch operators in Arizona and New Mexico facing new regulations related to endangered jaguars (Panthera onca). Our findings suggest that PES cannot overcome the perceived burdens of species protection regulations and are unlikely to increase collaboration between landowners and government agencies. PES approaches are only likely to succeed where there is strong fit between institutional design and resource manager preferences. In the context of endangered species, PES proponents must pay particular attention to institutional arrangements that reduce concerns about regulatory risk. To this end, to effectively meet endangered species conservation goals, we recommend: 1) framing PES programs as voluntary conservation incentives, 2) focusing incentives on healthy ecosystems rather than a single species, and 3) using private funding to support incentives. Under these circumstances, PES may be an effective endangered species conservation tool.",
keywords = "Endangered species, Jaguars, Payments for ecosystem services, Rangeland management, Wildlife conservation",
author = "Lien, {Aaron M.} and Colleen Ulibarri and Wendy Vanasco and Ruyle, {George B} and Scott Bonar and Laura L{\'o}pez-Hoffman",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "232",
pages = "74--82",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opportunities and barriers for endangered species conservation using payments for ecosystem services

AU - Lien, Aaron M.

AU - Ulibarri, Colleen

AU - Vanasco, Wendy

AU - Ruyle, George B

AU - Bonar, Scott

AU - López-Hoffman, Laura

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Endangered species laws seek to prevent extinction by outlawing actions that may cause harm or lead to extinction. In doing so, these laws are sometimes criticized for limiting management flexibility and subjecting landowners to regulatory burdens. One proposed solution to this challenge is development of payment for ecosystem service (PES) programs. These programs provide an economic incentive to conserve endangered species by compensating landowners for the costs of conservation or forgoing other profitable uses of land and resources. To assess the utility of PES as a means of overcoming opposition to endangered species regulations, we surveyed ranch operators in Arizona and New Mexico facing new regulations related to endangered jaguars (Panthera onca). Our findings suggest that PES cannot overcome the perceived burdens of species protection regulations and are unlikely to increase collaboration between landowners and government agencies. PES approaches are only likely to succeed where there is strong fit between institutional design and resource manager preferences. In the context of endangered species, PES proponents must pay particular attention to institutional arrangements that reduce concerns about regulatory risk. To this end, to effectively meet endangered species conservation goals, we recommend: 1) framing PES programs as voluntary conservation incentives, 2) focusing incentives on healthy ecosystems rather than a single species, and 3) using private funding to support incentives. Under these circumstances, PES may be an effective endangered species conservation tool.

AB - Endangered species laws seek to prevent extinction by outlawing actions that may cause harm or lead to extinction. In doing so, these laws are sometimes criticized for limiting management flexibility and subjecting landowners to regulatory burdens. One proposed solution to this challenge is development of payment for ecosystem service (PES) programs. These programs provide an economic incentive to conserve endangered species by compensating landowners for the costs of conservation or forgoing other profitable uses of land and resources. To assess the utility of PES as a means of overcoming opposition to endangered species regulations, we surveyed ranch operators in Arizona and New Mexico facing new regulations related to endangered jaguars (Panthera onca). Our findings suggest that PES cannot overcome the perceived burdens of species protection regulations and are unlikely to increase collaboration between landowners and government agencies. PES approaches are only likely to succeed where there is strong fit between institutional design and resource manager preferences. In the context of endangered species, PES proponents must pay particular attention to institutional arrangements that reduce concerns about regulatory risk. To this end, to effectively meet endangered species conservation goals, we recommend: 1) framing PES programs as voluntary conservation incentives, 2) focusing incentives on healthy ecosystems rather than a single species, and 3) using private funding to support incentives. Under these circumstances, PES may be an effective endangered species conservation tool.

KW - Endangered species

KW - Jaguars

KW - Payments for ecosystem services

KW - Rangeland management

KW - Wildlife conservation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061090998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061090998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.017

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061090998

VL - 232

SP - 74

EP - 82

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -