Opportunities and challenges in incorporating ancillary studies into a cancer prevention randomized clinical trial

Phyllis J. Goodman, Catherine M. Tangen, Amy K. Darke, Kathryn B. Arnold, Jo Ann Hartline, Monica Yee, Karen Anderson, Allison Caban-Holt, William G. Christen, Patricia A. Cassano, Peter Lance, Eric A. Klein, John J. Crowley, Lori M. Minasian, Frank L. Meyskens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prostate cancer prevention study funded by the National Cancer Institute and conducted by SWOG (Southwest Oncology Group). A total of 35,533 men were assigned randomly to one of four treatment groups (vitamin E + placebo, selenium + placebo, vitamin E + selenium, placebo + placebo). At the time of the trial's development, NIH had invested substantial resources in evaluating the potential benefits of these antioxidants. To capitalize on the knowledge gained from following a large cohort of healthy, aging males on the effects of selenium and/or vitamin E, ancillary studies with other disease endpoints were solicited. Methods: Four ancillary studies were added. Each drew from the same population but had independent objectives and an endpoint other than prostate cancer. These studies fell into two categories: those prospectively enrolling and following participants (studies of Alzheimer's disease and respiratory function) and those requiring a retrospective medical record review after a reported event (cataracts/age-related macular degeneration and colorectal screening). An examination of the challenges and opportunities of adding ancillary studies is provided. The impact of the ancillary studies on adherence to SELECT was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: While the addition of ancillary studies appears to have improved participant adherence to the primary trial, this did not come without added complexity. Activation of the ancillary studies happened after the SELECT randomizations had begun resulting in accrual problems to some of the studies. Study site participation in the ancillary trials varied greatly and depended on the interest of the study site principal investigator. Procedures for each were integrated into the primary trial and all monitoring was done by the SELECT Data and Safety Monitoring Committee. The impact of the early closure of the primary trial was different for each of the ancillary trials. Conclusions: The ancillary studies allowed study sites to broaden the research opportunities for their participants. Their implementation was efficient because of the established infrastructure of the primary trial. Implementation of these ancillary trials took substantial planning and coordination but enriched the overall primary trial. Trial registration:NCT00006392-S0000: Selenium and Vitamin E in Preventing Prostate Cancer (SELECT) (4 October 2000).NCT00780689-S0000A: Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease by Vitamin E and Selenium (PREADVISE) (25 June 2002).NCT00784225-S0000B: Vitamin E and/or Selenium in Preventing Cataract and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Men on SELECT SWOG-S0000 (SEE) (31 October 2008).NCT00706121-S0000D: Effect of Vitamin E and/or Selenium on Colorectal Polyps in Men Enrolled on SELECT Trial SWOG-S0000 (ACP) (26 June 2008).NCT00063453-S0000C: Vitamin E and/or Selenium in Preventing Loss of Lung Function in Older Men Enrolled on SELECT Clinical Trial SWOG-S0000 (26 June 2003).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number400
JournalTrials
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 12 2016

Keywords

  • Ancillary studies
  • Prostate cancer
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Study implementation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Opportunities and challenges in incorporating ancillary studies into a cancer prevention randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Goodman, P. J., Tangen, C. M., Darke, A. K., Arnold, K. B., Hartline, J. A., Yee, M., Anderson, K., Caban-Holt, A., Christen, W. G., Cassano, P. A., Lance, P., Klein, E. A., Crowley, J. J., Minasian, L. M., & Meyskens, F. L. (2016). Opportunities and challenges in incorporating ancillary studies into a cancer prevention randomized clinical trial. Trials, 17(1), [400]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1524-9