## Abstract

Applications of the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light range from the next generation of optical communication systems to optical imaging and optical manipulation of particles. Here we propose a micron-sized semiconductor source that emits light with predefined OAM pairs. This source is based on a polaritonic quantum fluid. We show how in this system modulational instabilities can be controlled and harnessed for the spontaneous formation of OAM pairs not present in the pump laser source. Once created, the OAM states exhibit exotic flow patterns in the quantum fluid, characterized by generation-annihilation pairs. These can only occur in open systems, not in equilibrium condensates, in contrast to well-established vortex-antivortex pairs.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Article number | 113903 |

Journal | Physical review letters |

Volume | 119 |

Issue number | 11 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - Sep 15 2017 |

## ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Physics and Astronomy(all)

## Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Optically Controlled Orbital Angular Momentum Generation in a Polaritonic Quantum Fluid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

## Cite this

- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS

*Physical review letters*,

*119*(11), [113903]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.113903

**Optically Controlled Orbital Angular Momentum Generation in a Polaritonic Quantum Fluid.** / Luk, S. M.H.; Kwong, N. H.; Lewandowski, P.; Schumacher, S.; Binder, R.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

*Physical review letters*, vol. 119, no. 11, 113903. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.113903

**Optically Controlled Orbital Angular Momentum Generation in a Polaritonic Quantum Fluid**. In: Physical review letters. 2017 ; Vol. 119, No. 11.

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optically Controlled Orbital Angular Momentum Generation in a Polaritonic Quantum Fluid

AU - Luk, S. M.H.

AU - Kwong, N. H.

AU - Lewandowski, P.

AU - Schumacher, S.

AU - Binder, R.

N1 - Funding Information: Luk S. M. H. 1 Kwong N. H. 2 Lewandowski P. 3 Schumacher S. 3,2 Binder R. 2,1 Department of Physics, 1 University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA College of Optical Sciences, 2 University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Physics Department and Center for Optoelectronics and Photonics Paderborn (CeOPP), 3 Universität Paderborn , Warburger Strasse 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany 15 September 2017 15 September 2017 119 11 113903 20 March 2017 © 2017 American Physical Society 2017 American Physical Society Applications of the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light range from the next generation of optical communication systems to optical imaging and optical manipulation of particles. Here we propose a micron-sized semiconductor source that emits light with predefined OAM pairs. This source is based on a polaritonic quantum fluid. We show how in this system modulational instabilities can be controlled and harnessed for the spontaneous formation of OAM pairs not present in the pump laser source. Once created, the OAM states exhibit exotic flow patterns in the quantum fluid, characterized by generation-annihilation pairs. These can only occur in open systems, not in equilibrium condensates, in contrast to well-established vortex-antivortex pairs. National Science Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001 NSF http://sws.geonames.org/6252001/ NSF ECCS-1406673 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659 German Research Foundation DFG http://sws.geonames.org/2921044/ DFG TRR142 SCHU 1980/5 The physics of orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light has attracted considerable attention ( [1–3] and references therein). The interest in the physics of OAM extends beyond the characterization and preparation of light beams with nonzero OAM, and includes such topics as rotational frequency shifts [4,5] , detailed analysis of the vortex physics [6] , the physics of OAM in second-harmonic generation [7,8] , optical solitons with nonzero OAM [9] , transfer and conservation of OAM from pump to down-converted beams [10,11] , OAM conservation in degenerate four-wave mixing [12] , data transmission using OAM multiplexing [13] , and quantum optical aspects such as entanglement [14] . In addition, manipulation and creation of OAM states using coherence gratings [15] , liquid crystals [16] , and metasurfaces [17] has been reported. There is also a vast body of research on exciton polaritons in semiconductor microcavities. Here, being part of the polaritons, otherwise noninteracting photons experience effective interactions through the polaritons’ excitonic component. This combines the advantages of nonlinear systems with the ease of measuring optical beams. Polaritons form a quantum fluid, and prominent examples of observed phenomena include parametric amplification [18] and Bose condensation ( [19,20] and references therein). Polaritonic quantum fluids can support vortices [21,22] , and it was recently demonstrated that OAM can be transferred to polaritonic Bose-Einstein condensates using chiral polaritonic lenses [23] , and that the number of vortices can be controlled by controlling the OAM of the pump beams [24,25] . The question remains whether the relatively strong interaction between polaritons can be used to manipulate, in a well-controlled fashion, the orbital and/or spin angular momentum of polaritons (and thus the light field emitted from the cavity). For example, is it possible to use a beam with OAM of m p and create additional OAM contributions, say two components of OAM m 1 and m 2 , and to use the light beam characteristics of frequency and intensity to control m 1 and m 2 ? The fact that rotationally symmetric states can be unstable under sufficiently large interactions is well known, and examples include spatial pattern formation in chemical reactions and the biological process of morphogenesis [26,27] , patterns in nonlinear optical solid-state and gaseous systems [28–30] , and pattern [31] and vortex formation in atomic and polaritonic quantum fluids [32–34] . However, the mere breaking of rotational symmetry does not answer the question of how one could design a nonlinear system that would perform similarly to the linear systems mentioned above, but with the benefit of all-optical control of its output. In the following, we show that polaritonic interactions can be harnessed to create spontaneously emerging OAM pairs [35] . The underlying physics is that of four-wave mixing instabilities, which is also used to create the above-mentioned optical patterns. However, in conventional pattern formation linear momentum (or wave vector) states become unstable and a state with wave vector k p can generate waves with k 1 and k 2 , and translational invariance dictates 2 k p = k 1 + k 2 . Many nonlinear systems allow only for a limited number of patterns, for example, in the case of wave vector instabilities, stripes (also called rolls), and hexagonal patterns [36] . In the present case, we consider a system that is not translationally invariant. We show that in a cylindrical cavity with finite radius pumped with polaritons of OAM m p , four-wave mixing instabilities lead to the spontaneous pairwise formation of OAM states with m 1 and m 2 , subject to the condition of angular momentum conservation [12] 2 m p = m 1 + m 2 , Fig. 1 . In analogy to the conventional patterns, we are interested in creating only a few stationary (at least on the nanosecond time scale considered here) OAM states. In contrast to [22,37] we are not creating vortex-antivortex pairs, i.e., regions of oppositely rotating flow patterns that correspond to opposite signs of ∇ → × j (where j is the particle current). Instead, we are creating generation-annihilation pairs, i.e., regions that generate and destroy polaritons corresponding to opposite signs of ∇ → · j ( r ) . In contrast to vortex-antivortex pairs, which can exist in closed systems and condensates in thermal equilibrium, generation-annihilation pairs can only exist in open systems. Moreover, we are not using seed beams (called imprint beams in [22] ) to trigger the instability; our instability is triggered by fluctuations and self sustained, requiring only the pump to be present. 1 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.113903.f1 FIG. 1. (a) Sketch of cylindrical semiconductor microcavity with distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) mirrors and one (or several) semiconductor quantum wells. (b) Schematic of a four-wave mixing (FWM) scattering process involving two incoming polaritons with orbital angular momentum m p and two outgoing polaritons (spontaneously created if FWM exhibits instability) with m 1 and m 2 . In semiconductor microcavities, there is also a spin-orbit interaction (SOI), giving rise, for example, to a polaritonic Hall effect, called the optical spin Hall effect [38] . A conceptually simple and robust all-optical control scheme of this effect has been demonstrated in [39] . The question then arises whether the spin-orbit interaction, caused by the splitting of transverse-electric (TE) and transverse-magnetic (TM) modes, renders the pure orbital angular momentum control impossible, as orbital and spin angular momentum are not independently conserved. For realistic values of the TE-TM splitting, we find the effect of the SOI to be unimportant and, for clarity, omit it in the following discussion (results including the SOI are in the Supplemental Material [40] , which includes Refs. [31,39,41] ). We treat the polariton system as a two-dimensional coherent field moving in the cavity plane [Fig. 1(a) ]. The field’s time evolution is governed in our model by a spinor Gross-Pitaevskii equation, i ℏ ∂ Ψ ± ∂ t = ( ℏ ω 0 - ℏ 2 2 M ∇ 2 + V - i γ ) Ψ ± + T + + | Ψ ± | 2 Ψ ± + T + - | Ψ ∓ | 2 Ψ ± + S ± . (1) Here Ψ σ ( r , t ) is the polariton field, with r = ( x , y ) and σ = + , - denoting the spin (polarization) state relative to the z axis (normal to the cavity’s plane). The source term S ± ( r , t ) plays the role of an external pump, and γ / ℏ is the combined rate of dissipative and radiative losses. ℏ ω 0 is the minimum polariton energy, M is the polariton mass, and T + + and T + - are parameters representing the scattering amplitudes between two polaritons with parallel and antiparallel spins, respectively. For analytical advantages, we formulate Eq. (1) in the angular momentum basis. The fields are expanded as Ψ ± ( r , t ) = ∑ m ∈ Z ψ m ± ( r , t ) e i m ϕ - i ω p t [similar for S ± ( r , t ) ] where ( r , ϕ ) are spatial polar coordinates, and ω p is the pump’s center frequency. Equation (1) yields the equations of motion of the radial components as i ℏ ∂ ∂ t ψ m ± ( r , t ) = [ - L m + V ( r ) ] ψ m ± ( r , t ) + s m ± ( r , t ) + ∑ m ′ m ′′ m ′′′ δ m + m ′′′ , m ′ + m ′′ × [ T + + ψ m ′′′ ± * ( r , t ) ψ m ′ ± ( r , t ) ψ m ′′ ± ( r , t ) + T + - ψ m ′′′ ∓ * ( r , t ) ψ m ′ ∓ ( r , t ) ψ m ′′ ± ( r , t ) ] , (2) where L m = ( ℏ 2 / 2 M ) [ ( ∂ 2 / ∂ r 2 ) + ( 1 / r ) ( ∂ / ∂ r ) + k p 2 - ( m 2 / r 2 ) ] + i γ and ( ℏ 2 k p 2 / 2 M ) = Δ p = ℏ ( ω p - ω 0 ) . V ( r ) is a circularly symmetric potential confining the polaritons to a region r ≤ R , requiring ψ m ± ( R ) = 0 . The cubic nonlinear terms represent two-polariton scattering between angular momentum states. Equation (2) is solved explicitly in time domain simulations. The pump is taken to be ( + ) polarized with an OAM equal to m p : s m σ = δ m m p δ σ + S ( r ) . Since the system’s setup is circularly symmetric, in the absence of instabilities, the excited coherent polariton keeps the pump’s OAM m p . [Incoherent polaritons carrying other m ’s are produced by scattering out of Ψ ± , which is considered as part of the loss γ in Eq. (2) .] The nonlinear terms, however, include four-wave mixing processes that may drive rotational modulational instabilities of the pumped polariton field, creating new angular momentum components. One such process, shown in Fig. 1(b) , is a scattering of two polaritons in the pump mode into two modes with OAM m 1 , m 2 , the values of which are restricted by OAM conservation m 1 + m 2 = 2 m p . Under favorable conditions, this scattering triggers the instability, which can result in optical parametric oscillation, by enabling mutually reinforcing growth in the polariton components in modes m 1 and m 2 . This is the rotational analog of the familiar translational FWM instability where two plane waves of equal and opposite linear momenta arise spontaneously out of a uniform field. A challenge common to many nonlinear systems is to find stationary patternlike solutions to the corresponding nonlinear equation. Performing large-scale numerical solutions of the nonlinear equations and scanning all control parameters is often prohibitively numerically expensive. Instead, one often performs a linear stability analysis (LSA). This helps identify modes that are linearly unstable, but it does not guarantee that those modes uniquely identify the emerging stationary patterns [36] . In the following, we therefore combine a simplified LSA, which allows us to obtain qualitative insight into possible instability scenarios, and then use numerical solutions of the full nonlinear equation to study the system for parameter values close to those suggested by LSA results. In our LSA, we assume the polariton component in the pump mode to be a constant, independent of r , which we denote by | ψ ¯ p + | 2 and the pump is monochromatic. Below, in the full numerical solution, a source S ( r , t ) excites a ψ m p + ( r ) that is almost r independent but drops to 0 close to R . There, the LSA results are a useful starting point for a numerical search for the desired instabilities. Within the LSA, | ψ ¯ p + | 2 is determined by S [now a number, not a function S ( r , t ) ] through Eq. (2) . The rotational stability of this steady state is examined by linearizing Eq. (2) in fluctuations in mode pairs ( m 1 , m 2 ) satisfying m 1 + m 2 = 2 m p and solving the attendant eigenvalue problem. Details of the LSA (including the role of T + - ) can be found in the Supplemental Material [40] . The stability eigenvalue λ (the linearized fluctuations are proportional to e - i λ t so that Im λ > 0 implies instability), for m p = 0 , is given by ℏ λ = - i γ ± ( ϵ m n - 2 T + + | ψ ¯ p + | 2 ) 2 - ( T + + | ψ ¯ p + | 2 ) 2 , (3) where ϵ m n = ( ℏ 2 / 2 M ) [ k p 2 - ( α m n / R ) 2 ] with α m n being the n th 0, not counting the origin, of the Bessel function J m . Denoting the imaginary part of the square root in Eq. (3) by Λ , we show in Fig. 2 the maximum growth rate Λ = Im ( ℏ λ ) + γ plotted against the pump-mode polariton component | ψ ¯ p + | for pump OAM m p = 0 and detuning Δ p = 1.5 meV . The physical parameters are M = 7.2 × 10 - 5 m 0 ( m 0 = free electron mass), T + + = 5.69 × 10 - 3 meV μ m 2 , and R = 5 μ m . With these parameters, the OAM modes with | m | = 1 , … , 4 have positive growth rate over various ranges of | ψ ¯ p + | values. However, the polaritonic interactions giving rise to the T + + | ψ ¯ p + | 2 term in Eq. (3) may also trigger radial instabilities, i.e., instabilities in the modes’ radial dynamics that do not generate new OAM components. We show these radial instabilities for the uniform, m p = 0 pumped mode as grey areas in Fig. 2 : one against the radial fluctuation mode with one node at r = R ( n = 1 ), and another against the mode with an additional node ( n = 2 ). The radial instabilities are undesirable because, in our simulations using Eq. (2) , their presence typically hinders the onset of rotational instabilities. In Fig. 2 , the region that avoids the radial instabilities but features a rotational instability with OAM m ≠ m p is indicated by the growth of the | m | = 4 mode with one node, labeled (4,1). This kind of stability information is useful for determining parameters for the full numerical simulations and experiments of OAM mode creations. 2 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.113903.f2 FIG. 2. The maximum growth rate Λ vs | ψ ¯ p + | . The brackets ( | m | , n ) indicate the OAM and n th 0, respectively. Here, m = ± 1 , ± 2 , ± 3 , ± 4 OAM modes have a positive growth rate. The growth rates of instabilities against radial fluctuation modes (with number of nodes indicated) are shown as grey areas ( n > 2 are stable). We see a range of | ψ ¯ p + | values (just below 5 μ m - 1 ) where (4,1) exhibits instability while ψ ¯ p + is radially stable [cf., Fig. 3(b) ]. The time evolution of the polariton field is followed beyond the linear instability regime with numerical simulation of Eq. (2) . Polariton fields with | m | ≤ 8 are included in the simulations, leading to numerically converged results for the cases considered here. The desired pumped polariton component is essentially uniform with a value denoted by | ψ ¯ p + | , except close to R , where it drops to 0. We design a source that creates such a target function in the absence of the OAM instability. Once the additional OAM modes are created, the pumped polaritons reach a new steady ψ m p + ( r ) that deviates slightly from the target function. These functions, together with details for the source, are given in the Supplemental Material [40] . In the simulation, the stationary states of the nonlinear system are reached after approximately 0.5 ns, and for all results discussed below the state reached after the instability remains unchanged for at least 1 ns. Figure 3 shows the fractions N m of different OAM modes, defined by N m = ∫ d r r | ψ m + ( r ) | 2 / ∑ m ′ ∫ d r r | ψ m ′ + ( r ) | 2 , in the final steady state reached by the system. In Fig. 3(a) , where m p = 0 , OAM modes with m 1 = + 2 and m 2 = - 2 are created. These new modes contribute a substantial amount to the total polariton number, here about 10% each. A different set of parameters yields OAM modes with m 1 = + 4 and m 2 = - 4 , Fig. 3(b) , which is consistent with the LSA (Fig. 2 ). Again, the density fractions of these modes are substantial. The creation of polariton OAM modes is not limited to m p = 0 . In Fig. 3(c) we demonstrate a case with m p = 1 , where OAM modes m 1 = 6 and m 2 = - 4 are created. 3 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.113903.f3 FIG. 3. Left: The polariton density OAM fractions N m under self-sustained optical parametric oscillation conditions (rounded values indicated in the figure). Spontaneously created modes have OAM (a) m 1 = + 2 and m 2 = - 2 , (b) m 1 = + 4 and m 2 = - 4 , and (c) m 1 = 6 and m 2 = - 4 . Parameters: (a) m p = 0 , Δ p = 0.7 meV , γ = 0.05 meV , | ψ ¯ p + | = 4.0 μ m - 1 ; (b) m p = 0 , Δ p = 1.5 meV , γ = 0.15 meV , | ψ ¯ p + | = 5.5 μ m - 1 ; (c) m p = 1 , Δ p = 2.0 meV , γ = 0.15 meV , | ψ ¯ p + | = 5.7 μ m - 1 . Right: [(d)–(f)] Corresponding real-space distribution of polariton density | Ψ + ( r ) | 2 (units of μ m - 2 ). We show the corresponding steady state polariton densities, | Ψ + ( r ) | 2 , in Fig. 3 for the three parameter sets discussed above. For m p = 0 the pump alone would yield a circularly symmetric pattern. For the first case, where m = ± 2 OAM modes are spontaneously created, the three modes superpose to create a fourfold pattern, and the intensity in Fig. 3(d) shows two brighter spots or areas on the x axis and two dimmer spots or areas on the y axis. Similarly for the second case, where m = ± 4 OAM modes are created, the three modes ( m = 0 , ± 4 ) generate an eightfold pattern, with four brighter spots or areas on the x and y axes, and four dimmer (hardly recognizable) spots or areas on the two diagonals; see Fig. 3(e) . When m p = 1 , the spontaneously created modes are m 1 = 6 and m 2 = - 4 , and a simple analytical model for the expected angle dependence of the intensity yields a dependence ∝ cos ( 5 ϕ + ϕ off ) , ϕ off being an offset angle, in agreement with Fig. 3(f) . The spontaneous formation of new OAM states through rotational FWM instabilities also results in the formation of nontrivial or exotic flow patterns, as determined by the current density j = ( ℏ / 2 M i ) ( Ψ * ∇ → Ψ - Ψ ∇ → Ψ * ) . An example of such a flow pattern is shown in Fig. 4 for the dominating component Ψ = Ψ + . Quite generally, the resulting flow patterns feature spatially distributed generation-annihilation pairs [i.e., sources and sinks of the polariton density corresponding to opposite signs of ∇ → · j ( r ) ]. Figure 4 shows the case of m p = 1 , in which the circulation at the origin, which here is trivially generated by the pump, is surrounded by five generation-annihilation pairs. One can see that the sources correspond to the intensity peaks in Fig. 3(f) . 4 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.113903.f4 FIG. 4. The real-space flow pattern given by the normalized current density j ( r ) / | j ( r ) | (arrows) and the divergence of the current, ∇ → · j ( r ) , shown as a color plot, with units of μ m - 2 ps - 1 , for the case of Figs. 3(c) and 3(f) . The circulation at the origin, here trivially generated by the m p = 1 pump, is surrounded by five generation-annihilation pairs that emerge as part of the self-sustained optical parametric oscillation. For additional flow patterns see Supplemental Material [40] . In conclusion, the potential for using four-wave mixing instability in semiconductor microcavities as an effective way to spontaneously generate sizable pairs of OAM components of light is theoretically demonstrated. Our theory explains the underlying physics and shows how specific individual OAM modes can be created by varying the optical pump parameters. For applications, demultiplexing (sorting) techniques [42,43] based on azimuthal-to-linear mapping allow us to identify the OAM states, and extracting single components may become possible through a sequence of demultiplexing, blocking of some of the OAM states, and linear-to-azimuthal multiplexing. In the future, more general numerical search algorithms may discover a larger variety of spontaneously formed OAM modes, possibly including nontrivial effects due to polaritonic spin-orbit interaction. Furthermore, it will be interesting to extend the present study to pump polarizations other than circular, confinement potentials other than steplike, and to investigate whether other systems with disklike geometry can provide sufficiently strong nonlinearities to allow for similar OAM instabilities, possibly with the benefit of more efficient coupling to pump light (e.g., microdisks with Kerr nonlinearities, rare-earth disklike doped sections in optical fibers, or disklike containers including atoms such as rubidium [30] or sodium [44] ). We hope that, in the long term, our approach can even yield a device that delivers “OAM modes on demand.” We gratefully acknowledge helpful discussions with Ewan Wright and financial support from the U.S. NSF under Grant No. ECCS-1406673, TRIF SEOS, and the German DFG (Grant No. TRR142, SCHU 1980/5, Heisenberg program). [1] 1 L. Allen , S. M. Barnett , and M. J. Padgett , Optical Angular Momentum ( Institute of Physics Publishing , Bristol, 2003 ). [2] 2 J. P. Torres and L. Torner , Twisted Photons: Applications of Light with Orbital Angular Momentum ( Wiley-VCH , Singapore, 2011 ). [3] 3 M. Mansuripur , J. Opt. 19 , 013001 ( 2017 ). JOOPCA 2040-8978 10.1088/2040-8978/19/1/013001 [4] 4 I. Bialynicka-Birula and Z. Bialynicki-Birula , Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 , 2539 ( 1997 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2539 [5] 5 J. Courtial , D. A. Robertson , K. Dholakia , L. Allen , and M. J. Padgett , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 , 4828 ( 1998 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4828 [6] 6 G. A. Swartzlander and R. I. Hernandez-Aranda , Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 , 163901 ( 2007 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.163901 [7] 7 K. Dholakia , N. B. Simpson , M. J. Padgett , and L. Allen , Phys. Rev. A 54 , R3742 ( 1996 ). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R3742 [8] 8 J. Courtial , K. Dholakia , L. Allen , and M. J. Padgett , Phys. Rev. A 56 , 4193 ( 1997 ). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.4193 [9] 9 W. J. Firth and D. V. Skryabin , Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 , 2450 ( 1997 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2450 [10] 10 D. P. Caetano , M. P. Almeida , P. H. SoutoRibeiro , J. A. O. Huguenin , B. CoutinhodosSantos , and A. Z. Khoury , Phys. Rev. A 66 , 041801 ( 2002 ). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.041801 [11] 11 M. Martinelli , J. A. O. Huguenin , P. Nussenzveig , and A. Z. Khoury , Phys. Rev. A 70 , 013812 ( 2004 ). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.013812 [12] 12 V. Pyragaite , K. Regelskis , V. Smilgevicius , and A. Stabinis , Opt. Commun. 198 , 459 ( 2001 ). OPCOB8 0030-4018 10.1016/S0030-4018(01)01551-6 [13] 13 J. Wang , Nat. Photonics 6 , 488 ( 2012 ). NPAHBY 1749-4885 10.1038/nphoton.2012.138 [14] 14 A. Mair , A. Vaziri , G. Weihs , and A. Zeilinger , Nature (London) 412 , 313 ( 2001 ). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35085529 [15] 15 S. Barreiro and J. W. R. Tabosa , Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 , 133001 ( 2003 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.133001 [16] 16 C. Loussert , U. Delabre , and E. Brasselet , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 , 037802 ( 2013 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.037802 [17] 17 F. Yue , D. Wen , C. Zhang , B. D. Gerardot , W. Wang , S. Zhang , and X. Chen , Adv. Mater. 29 , 1603838 ( 2017 ). ADVMEW 0935-9648 10.1002/adma.201603838 [18] 18 P. G. Savvidis , J. J. Baumberg , R. M. Stevenson , M. S. Skolnick , D. M. Whittaker , and J. S. Roberts , Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 , 1547 ( 2000 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1547 [19] 19 H. Deng , H. Haug , and Y. Yamamoto , Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 , 1489 ( 2010 ). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1489 [20] 20 D. Snoke and P. Littlewood , Phys. Today 63 , 42 ( 2010 ). PHTOAD 0031-9228 10.1063/1.3480075 [21] 21 D. Whittaker , Superlattices Microstruct. 41 , 297 ( 2007 ). SUMIEK 0749-6036 10.1016/j.spmi.2007.03.032 [22] 22 D. N. Krizhanovskii , Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 , 126402 ( 2010 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.126402 [23] 23 R. Dall , M. D. Fraser , A. S. Desyatnikov , G. Li , S. Brodbeck , M. Kamp , C. Schneider , S. Hofling , and E. A. Ostrovskaya , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 , 200404 ( 2014 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.200404 [24] 24 T. Boulier , H. Terças , D. D. Solnyshkov , Q. Glorieux , E. Giacobino , G. Malpuech , and A. Bramati , Sci. Rep. 5 , 9230 ( 2015 ). SRCEC3 2045-2322 10.1038/srep09230 [25] 25 T. Boulier , E. Cancellieri , N. D. Sangouard , Q. Glorieux , A. V. Kavokin , D. M. Whittaker , E. Giacobino , and A. Bramati , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 , 116402 ( 2016 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.116402 [26] 26 A. Turing , Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 237 , 37 ( 1952 ). PTRBAE 0962-8436 10.1098/rstb.1952.0012 [27] 27 P. Ball , The Self-Made Tapestry: Pattern Formation in Nature ( Oxford University Press , New York, 1999 ). [28] 28 K. Staliunas , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 , 81 ( 1998 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.81 [29] 29 R. Kheradmand , M. Sahrai , H. Tajalli , G. Tissoni , and L. A. Lugiato , Eur. Phys. J. D 47 , 107 ( 2008 ). EPJDF6 1434-6060 10.1140/epjd/e2008-00037-y [30] 30 A. M. C. Dawes , L. Illing , S. M. Clark , and D. J. Gauthier , Science 308 , 672 ( 2005 ). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1110151 [31] 31 V. Ardizzone , Sci. Rep. 3 , 3016 ( 2013 ). SRCEC3 2045-2322 10.1038/srep03016 [32] 32 C. N. Weiler , T. W. Neely , D. R. Scherer , A. S. Bradley , M. J. Davis , and B. P. Anderson , Nature (London) 455 , 948 ( 2008 ). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature07334 [33] 33 J. Keeling and N. G. Berloff , Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 , 250401 ( 2008 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.250401 [34] 34 L. Dominici , Sci. Adv. 1 , e1500807 ( 2015 ). SACDAF 2375-2548 10.1126/sciadv.1500807 [35] We recently learned of a study [45] in which polaritonic OAM state creation and OAM decomposition of polariton patterns has been successfully demonstrated. [36] 36 A. Newell , T. Passot , and J. Lega , Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25 , 399 ( 1993 ). ARVFA3 0066-4189 10.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.002151 [37] 37 G. Tosi , Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 , 036401 ( 2011 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.036401 [38] 38 C. Leyder , M. Romanelli , J. Ph. Karr , E. Giacobino , T. C. H. Liew , M. M. Glazov , A. V. Kavokin , G. Malpuech , and A. Bramati , Nat. Phys. 3 , 628 ( 2007 ). NPAHAX 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys676 [39] 39 O. Lafont , Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 , 061108 ( 2017 ). APPLAB 0003-6951 10.1063/1.4975681 [40] 40 See Supplemental Material http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.113903 for further theoretical details and additional results. [41] 41 R. Takayama , N. H. Kwong , I. Rumyantsev , M. Kuwata-Gonokami , and R. Binder , Eur. Phys. J. B 25 , 445 ( 2002 ). EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1140/epjb/e20020051 [42] 42 G. C. G. Berkhout , M. P. J. Lavery , J. Courtial , M. W. Beijersbergen , and M. J. Padgett , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 , 153601 ( 2010 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.153601 [43] 43 M. O’Sullivan , M. Mirhosseini , M. Malik , and R. Boyd , Opt. Express 20 , 24444 ( 2012 ). OPEXFF 1094-4087 10.1364/OE.20.024444 [44] 44 R. Herrero , E. GrosseWesthoff , A. Aumann , T. Ackemann , Y. A. Logvin , and W. Lange , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 , 4627 ( 1999 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4627 [45] 45 C. E. Whittaker , Phys. Rev. X 7 , 031033 ( 2017 ). PRXHAE 2160-3308 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031033

PY - 2017/9/15

Y1 - 2017/9/15

N2 - Applications of the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light range from the next generation of optical communication systems to optical imaging and optical manipulation of particles. Here we propose a micron-sized semiconductor source that emits light with predefined OAM pairs. This source is based on a polaritonic quantum fluid. We show how in this system modulational instabilities can be controlled and harnessed for the spontaneous formation of OAM pairs not present in the pump laser source. Once created, the OAM states exhibit exotic flow patterns in the quantum fluid, characterized by generation-annihilation pairs. These can only occur in open systems, not in equilibrium condensates, in contrast to well-established vortex-antivortex pairs.

AB - Applications of the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light range from the next generation of optical communication systems to optical imaging and optical manipulation of particles. Here we propose a micron-sized semiconductor source that emits light with predefined OAM pairs. This source is based on a polaritonic quantum fluid. We show how in this system modulational instabilities can be controlled and harnessed for the spontaneous formation of OAM pairs not present in the pump laser source. Once created, the OAM states exhibit exotic flow patterns in the quantum fluid, characterized by generation-annihilation pairs. These can only occur in open systems, not in equilibrium condensates, in contrast to well-established vortex-antivortex pairs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029903343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029903343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.113903

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.113903

M3 - Article

C2 - 28949243

AN - SCOPUS:85029903343

VL - 119

JO - Physical Review Letters

JF - Physical Review Letters

SN - 0031-9007

IS - 11

M1 - 113903

ER -