Organizational justice and black applicants' reactions to affirmative action

Russell Cropanzano, Jerel E Slaughter, Peter D. Bachiochi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using organizational justice as a guiding framework, the authors studied perceptions of affirmative action programs by presumed beneficiaries. Three conceptual issues were addressed: (a) the content of different affirmative action plans; (b) the 3-way interaction among distributive, procedural, and interactional justice; and (c) the distinction between outcome favorability and distributive justice. These ideas were tested with a sample of Black engineering students who responded to 1 of 6 plans. Participants distinguished among the various plans, with some policies being viewed as more fair than others. In addition, a 3-way interaction among the 3 types of organizational justice was observed. Specifically, the 2-way interaction between distributive and interactional fairness was only significant when procedural justice was low. Implications for organizational justice and for the design of affirmative action programs are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1168-1184
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume90
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Students

Keywords

  • Affirmative action
  • Diversity
  • Organizational justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Organizational justice and black applicants' reactions to affirmative action. / Cropanzano, Russell; Slaughter, Jerel E; Bachiochi, Peter D.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 6, 11.2005, p. 1168-1184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cropanzano, Russell ; Slaughter, Jerel E ; Bachiochi, Peter D. / Organizational justice and black applicants' reactions to affirmative action. In: Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005 ; Vol. 90, No. 6. pp. 1168-1184.
@article{98ea3707e3cd45629000c42775bb7a57,
title = "Organizational justice and black applicants' reactions to affirmative action",
abstract = "Using organizational justice as a guiding framework, the authors studied perceptions of affirmative action programs by presumed beneficiaries. Three conceptual issues were addressed: (a) the content of different affirmative action plans; (b) the 3-way interaction among distributive, procedural, and interactional justice; and (c) the distinction between outcome favorability and distributive justice. These ideas were tested with a sample of Black engineering students who responded to 1 of 6 plans. Participants distinguished among the various plans, with some policies being viewed as more fair than others. In addition, a 3-way interaction among the 3 types of organizational justice was observed. Specifically, the 2-way interaction between distributive and interactional fairness was only significant when procedural justice was low. Implications for organizational justice and for the design of affirmative action programs are discussed.",
keywords = "Affirmative action, Diversity, Organizational justice",
author = "Russell Cropanzano and Slaughter, {Jerel E} and Bachiochi, {Peter D.}",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1168",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "1168--1184",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational justice and black applicants' reactions to affirmative action

AU - Cropanzano, Russell

AU - Slaughter, Jerel E

AU - Bachiochi, Peter D.

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Using organizational justice as a guiding framework, the authors studied perceptions of affirmative action programs by presumed beneficiaries. Three conceptual issues were addressed: (a) the content of different affirmative action plans; (b) the 3-way interaction among distributive, procedural, and interactional justice; and (c) the distinction between outcome favorability and distributive justice. These ideas were tested with a sample of Black engineering students who responded to 1 of 6 plans. Participants distinguished among the various plans, with some policies being viewed as more fair than others. In addition, a 3-way interaction among the 3 types of organizational justice was observed. Specifically, the 2-way interaction between distributive and interactional fairness was only significant when procedural justice was low. Implications for organizational justice and for the design of affirmative action programs are discussed.

AB - Using organizational justice as a guiding framework, the authors studied perceptions of affirmative action programs by presumed beneficiaries. Three conceptual issues were addressed: (a) the content of different affirmative action plans; (b) the 3-way interaction among distributive, procedural, and interactional justice; and (c) the distinction between outcome favorability and distributive justice. These ideas were tested with a sample of Black engineering students who responded to 1 of 6 plans. Participants distinguished among the various plans, with some policies being viewed as more fair than others. In addition, a 3-way interaction among the 3 types of organizational justice was observed. Specifically, the 2-way interaction between distributive and interactional fairness was only significant when procedural justice was low. Implications for organizational justice and for the design of affirmative action programs are discussed.

KW - Affirmative action

KW - Diversity

KW - Organizational justice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29444441444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29444441444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1168

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1168

M3 - Article

C2 - 16316272

AN - SCOPUS:29444441444

VL - 90

SP - 1168

EP - 1184

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 6

ER -