Orthopedic communication about osteoarthritis treatment: Does patient race matter?

Leslie R M Hausmann, Barbara H. Hanusa, Denise M. Kresevic, Susan Zickmund, Bruce S. Ling, Howard S. Gordon, Chian K Kwoh, Maria K. Mor, Michael J. Hannon, Peter Z. Cohen, Richard Grant, Said A. Ibrahim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To understand racial disparities in the use of total joint replacement, we examined whether there were racial differences in patient-provider communication about treatment of chronic knee and hip osteoarthritis in a sample of African American and white patients referred to Veterans Affairs orthopedic clinics. Methods: Audio recorded visits between patients and orthopedic surgeons were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System and the Informed Decision-Making model. Racial differences in communication outcomes were assessed using linear regression models adjusted for study design, patient characteristics, and clustering by provider. Results: The sample (n = 402) included 296 white and 106 African American patients. Most patients were men (95%) and ages 50-64 years (68%). Almost half (41%) reported an income <$20,000. African American patients were younger and reported lower incomes than white patients. Visits with African American patients contained less discussion of biomedical topics (β = -9.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] - 16.73, - 1.54) and more rapport-building statements (β = 7.84; 95% CI 1.85, 13.82) than visits with white patients. However, no racial differences were observed with regard to length of visit, overall amount of dialogue, discussion of psychosocial issues, patient activation/engagement statements, physician verbal dominance, display of positive affect by patients or providers, or discussion related to informed decision making. Conclusion: In this sample, communication between orthopedic surgeons and patients regarding the management of chronic knee and hip osteoarthritis did not, for the most part, vary by patient race. These findings diminish the potential role of communication in Veterans Affairs orthopedic settings as an explanation for well-documented racial disparities in the use of total joint replacement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)635-642
Number of pages8
JournalArthritis Care and Research
Volume63
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Osteoarthritis
Orthopedics
Communication
African Americans
Therapeutics
Replacement Arthroplasties
Patient Participation
Hip Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Veterans
Linear Models
Decision Making
Confidence Intervals
Cluster Analysis
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Cite this

Hausmann, L. R. M., Hanusa, B. H., Kresevic, D. M., Zickmund, S., Ling, B. S., Gordon, H. S., ... Ibrahim, S. A. (2011). Orthopedic communication about osteoarthritis treatment: Does patient race matter? Arthritis Care and Research, 63(5), 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20429

Orthopedic communication about osteoarthritis treatment : Does patient race matter? / Hausmann, Leslie R M; Hanusa, Barbara H.; Kresevic, Denise M.; Zickmund, Susan; Ling, Bruce S.; Gordon, Howard S.; Kwoh, Chian K; Mor, Maria K.; Hannon, Michael J.; Cohen, Peter Z.; Grant, Richard; Ibrahim, Said A.

In: Arthritis Care and Research, Vol. 63, No. 5, 05.2011, p. 635-642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hausmann, LRM, Hanusa, BH, Kresevic, DM, Zickmund, S, Ling, BS, Gordon, HS, Kwoh, CK, Mor, MK, Hannon, MJ, Cohen, PZ, Grant, R & Ibrahim, SA 2011, 'Orthopedic communication about osteoarthritis treatment: Does patient race matter?', Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20429
Hausmann LRM, Hanusa BH, Kresevic DM, Zickmund S, Ling BS, Gordon HS et al. Orthopedic communication about osteoarthritis treatment: Does patient race matter? Arthritis Care and Research. 2011 May;63(5):635-642. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20429
Hausmann, Leslie R M ; Hanusa, Barbara H. ; Kresevic, Denise M. ; Zickmund, Susan ; Ling, Bruce S. ; Gordon, Howard S. ; Kwoh, Chian K ; Mor, Maria K. ; Hannon, Michael J. ; Cohen, Peter Z. ; Grant, Richard ; Ibrahim, Said A. / Orthopedic communication about osteoarthritis treatment : Does patient race matter?. In: Arthritis Care and Research. 2011 ; Vol. 63, No. 5. pp. 635-642.
@article{312d97a72b4a41fc94990a8afb7611ac,
title = "Orthopedic communication about osteoarthritis treatment: Does patient race matter?",
abstract = "Objective: To understand racial disparities in the use of total joint replacement, we examined whether there were racial differences in patient-provider communication about treatment of chronic knee and hip osteoarthritis in a sample of African American and white patients referred to Veterans Affairs orthopedic clinics. Methods: Audio recorded visits between patients and orthopedic surgeons were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System and the Informed Decision-Making model. Racial differences in communication outcomes were assessed using linear regression models adjusted for study design, patient characteristics, and clustering by provider. Results: The sample (n = 402) included 296 white and 106 African American patients. Most patients were men (95{\%}) and ages 50-64 years (68{\%}). Almost half (41{\%}) reported an income <$20,000. African American patients were younger and reported lower incomes than white patients. Visits with African American patients contained less discussion of biomedical topics (β = -9.14; 95{\%} confidence interval [95{\%} CI] - 16.73, - 1.54) and more rapport-building statements (β = 7.84; 95{\%} CI 1.85, 13.82) than visits with white patients. However, no racial differences were observed with regard to length of visit, overall amount of dialogue, discussion of psychosocial issues, patient activation/engagement statements, physician verbal dominance, display of positive affect by patients or providers, or discussion related to informed decision making. Conclusion: In this sample, communication between orthopedic surgeons and patients regarding the management of chronic knee and hip osteoarthritis did not, for the most part, vary by patient race. These findings diminish the potential role of communication in Veterans Affairs orthopedic settings as an explanation for well-documented racial disparities in the use of total joint replacement.",
author = "Hausmann, {Leslie R M} and Hanusa, {Barbara H.} and Kresevic, {Denise M.} and Susan Zickmund and Ling, {Bruce S.} and Gordon, {Howard S.} and Kwoh, {Chian K} and Mor, {Maria K.} and Hannon, {Michael J.} and Cohen, {Peter Z.} and Richard Grant and Ibrahim, {Said A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/acr.20429",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "635--642",
journal = "Arthritis and Rheumatology",
issn = "2326-5191",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orthopedic communication about osteoarthritis treatment

T2 - Does patient race matter?

AU - Hausmann, Leslie R M

AU - Hanusa, Barbara H.

AU - Kresevic, Denise M.

AU - Zickmund, Susan

AU - Ling, Bruce S.

AU - Gordon, Howard S.

AU - Kwoh, Chian K

AU - Mor, Maria K.

AU - Hannon, Michael J.

AU - Cohen, Peter Z.

AU - Grant, Richard

AU - Ibrahim, Said A.

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Objective: To understand racial disparities in the use of total joint replacement, we examined whether there were racial differences in patient-provider communication about treatment of chronic knee and hip osteoarthritis in a sample of African American and white patients referred to Veterans Affairs orthopedic clinics. Methods: Audio recorded visits between patients and orthopedic surgeons were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System and the Informed Decision-Making model. Racial differences in communication outcomes were assessed using linear regression models adjusted for study design, patient characteristics, and clustering by provider. Results: The sample (n = 402) included 296 white and 106 African American patients. Most patients were men (95%) and ages 50-64 years (68%). Almost half (41%) reported an income <$20,000. African American patients were younger and reported lower incomes than white patients. Visits with African American patients contained less discussion of biomedical topics (β = -9.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] - 16.73, - 1.54) and more rapport-building statements (β = 7.84; 95% CI 1.85, 13.82) than visits with white patients. However, no racial differences were observed with regard to length of visit, overall amount of dialogue, discussion of psychosocial issues, patient activation/engagement statements, physician verbal dominance, display of positive affect by patients or providers, or discussion related to informed decision making. Conclusion: In this sample, communication between orthopedic surgeons and patients regarding the management of chronic knee and hip osteoarthritis did not, for the most part, vary by patient race. These findings diminish the potential role of communication in Veterans Affairs orthopedic settings as an explanation for well-documented racial disparities in the use of total joint replacement.

AB - Objective: To understand racial disparities in the use of total joint replacement, we examined whether there were racial differences in patient-provider communication about treatment of chronic knee and hip osteoarthritis in a sample of African American and white patients referred to Veterans Affairs orthopedic clinics. Methods: Audio recorded visits between patients and orthopedic surgeons were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System and the Informed Decision-Making model. Racial differences in communication outcomes were assessed using linear regression models adjusted for study design, patient characteristics, and clustering by provider. Results: The sample (n = 402) included 296 white and 106 African American patients. Most patients were men (95%) and ages 50-64 years (68%). Almost half (41%) reported an income <$20,000. African American patients were younger and reported lower incomes than white patients. Visits with African American patients contained less discussion of biomedical topics (β = -9.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] - 16.73, - 1.54) and more rapport-building statements (β = 7.84; 95% CI 1.85, 13.82) than visits with white patients. However, no racial differences were observed with regard to length of visit, overall amount of dialogue, discussion of psychosocial issues, patient activation/engagement statements, physician verbal dominance, display of positive affect by patients or providers, or discussion related to informed decision making. Conclusion: In this sample, communication between orthopedic surgeons and patients regarding the management of chronic knee and hip osteoarthritis did not, for the most part, vary by patient race. These findings diminish the potential role of communication in Veterans Affairs orthopedic settings as an explanation for well-documented racial disparities in the use of total joint replacement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958817120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958817120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acr.20429

DO - 10.1002/acr.20429

M3 - Article

C2 - 21225676

AN - SCOPUS:79958817120

VL - 63

SP - 635

EP - 642

JO - Arthritis and Rheumatology

JF - Arthritis and Rheumatology

SN - 2326-5191

IS - 5

ER -