Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement after previous sternotomy

Damien J. LaPar, Zequan Yang, George J. Stukenborg, Benjamin B. Peeler, John A. Kern, Irving L. Kron, Gorav Ailawadi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Increasingly, patients with previous sternotomy require aortic valve replacement. We compared outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement after previous sternotomy and primary aortic valve replacement by surgical era. Effect of initial cardiac operation on reoperative aortic valve replacement was also investigated. Methods: Between January 1996 and December 2007, a total of 1603 patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were entered prospectively into our clinical database. Patients were divided into eras A (1996-1999), B (2000-2003), and C (2004-2007). A total of 191 patients (12%) had previous sternotomy for coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 88), coronary artery bypass grafting with aortic valve replacement (n = 16), aortic valve replacement with or without other aortic procedure (n = 70), and other cardiac procedures (n = 17). Mean ages were 66.5 ± 13.1 years in reoperative group and 65.5 ± 14.9 years in primary group. Results: Mortality in reoperative group decreased significantly with time (A 15.4% vs B 15.1% vs C 2.0%, P = .004) and was equivalent to primary group in era C (3.5% vs 2.0%, P = .65). Major complications also significantly decreased with time in reoperative group (A 25.6% vs B 17.0% vs C 6.1%, P = .006). Importantly, patients had more comorbidities with time and increased preoperative risk in era C. There were no differences in outcome by initial cardiac operation in reoperative group. Conclusions: Reoperative aortic valve replacement now carries similar morbidity and mortality to primary replacement. Risk of reoperation is not affected by primary operation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-272
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume139
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sternotomy
Aortic Valve
Coronary Artery Bypass
Mortality
Reoperation
Comorbidity
Databases
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement after previous sternotomy. / LaPar, Damien J.; Yang, Zequan; Stukenborg, George J.; Peeler, Benjamin B.; Kern, John A.; Kron, Irving L.; Ailawadi, Gorav.

In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 139, No. 2, 01.02.2010, p. 263-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

LaPar, Damien J. ; Yang, Zequan ; Stukenborg, George J. ; Peeler, Benjamin B. ; Kern, John A. ; Kron, Irving L. ; Ailawadi, Gorav. / Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement after previous sternotomy. In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 139, No. 2. pp. 263-272.
@article{ad923fa74a2044b683055b6c27c8bb7c,
title = "Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement after previous sternotomy",
abstract = "Objective: Increasingly, patients with previous sternotomy require aortic valve replacement. We compared outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement after previous sternotomy and primary aortic valve replacement by surgical era. Effect of initial cardiac operation on reoperative aortic valve replacement was also investigated. Methods: Between January 1996 and December 2007, a total of 1603 patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were entered prospectively into our clinical database. Patients were divided into eras A (1996-1999), B (2000-2003), and C (2004-2007). A total of 191 patients (12{\%}) had previous sternotomy for coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 88), coronary artery bypass grafting with aortic valve replacement (n = 16), aortic valve replacement with or without other aortic procedure (n = 70), and other cardiac procedures (n = 17). Mean ages were 66.5 ± 13.1 years in reoperative group and 65.5 ± 14.9 years in primary group. Results: Mortality in reoperative group decreased significantly with time (A 15.4{\%} vs B 15.1{\%} vs C 2.0{\%}, P = .004) and was equivalent to primary group in era C (3.5{\%} vs 2.0{\%}, P = .65). Major complications also significantly decreased with time in reoperative group (A 25.6{\%} vs B 17.0{\%} vs C 6.1{\%}, P = .006). Importantly, patients had more comorbidities with time and increased preoperative risk in era C. There were no differences in outcome by initial cardiac operation in reoperative group. Conclusions: Reoperative aortic valve replacement now carries similar morbidity and mortality to primary replacement. Risk of reoperation is not affected by primary operation.",
author = "LaPar, {Damien J.} and Zequan Yang and Stukenborg, {George J.} and Peeler, {Benjamin B.} and Kern, {John A.} and Kron, {Irving L.} and Gorav Ailawadi",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "263--272",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "0022-5223",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement after previous sternotomy

AU - LaPar, Damien J.

AU - Yang, Zequan

AU - Stukenborg, George J.

AU - Peeler, Benjamin B.

AU - Kern, John A.

AU - Kron, Irving L.

AU - Ailawadi, Gorav

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - Objective: Increasingly, patients with previous sternotomy require aortic valve replacement. We compared outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement after previous sternotomy and primary aortic valve replacement by surgical era. Effect of initial cardiac operation on reoperative aortic valve replacement was also investigated. Methods: Between January 1996 and December 2007, a total of 1603 patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were entered prospectively into our clinical database. Patients were divided into eras A (1996-1999), B (2000-2003), and C (2004-2007). A total of 191 patients (12%) had previous sternotomy for coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 88), coronary artery bypass grafting with aortic valve replacement (n = 16), aortic valve replacement with or without other aortic procedure (n = 70), and other cardiac procedures (n = 17). Mean ages were 66.5 ± 13.1 years in reoperative group and 65.5 ± 14.9 years in primary group. Results: Mortality in reoperative group decreased significantly with time (A 15.4% vs B 15.1% vs C 2.0%, P = .004) and was equivalent to primary group in era C (3.5% vs 2.0%, P = .65). Major complications also significantly decreased with time in reoperative group (A 25.6% vs B 17.0% vs C 6.1%, P = .006). Importantly, patients had more comorbidities with time and increased preoperative risk in era C. There were no differences in outcome by initial cardiac operation in reoperative group. Conclusions: Reoperative aortic valve replacement now carries similar morbidity and mortality to primary replacement. Risk of reoperation is not affected by primary operation.

AB - Objective: Increasingly, patients with previous sternotomy require aortic valve replacement. We compared outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement after previous sternotomy and primary aortic valve replacement by surgical era. Effect of initial cardiac operation on reoperative aortic valve replacement was also investigated. Methods: Between January 1996 and December 2007, a total of 1603 patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were entered prospectively into our clinical database. Patients were divided into eras A (1996-1999), B (2000-2003), and C (2004-2007). A total of 191 patients (12%) had previous sternotomy for coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 88), coronary artery bypass grafting with aortic valve replacement (n = 16), aortic valve replacement with or without other aortic procedure (n = 70), and other cardiac procedures (n = 17). Mean ages were 66.5 ± 13.1 years in reoperative group and 65.5 ± 14.9 years in primary group. Results: Mortality in reoperative group decreased significantly with time (A 15.4% vs B 15.1% vs C 2.0%, P = .004) and was equivalent to primary group in era C (3.5% vs 2.0%, P = .65). Major complications also significantly decreased with time in reoperative group (A 25.6% vs B 17.0% vs C 6.1%, P = .006). Importantly, patients had more comorbidities with time and increased preoperative risk in era C. There were no differences in outcome by initial cardiac operation in reoperative group. Conclusions: Reoperative aortic valve replacement now carries similar morbidity and mortality to primary replacement. Risk of reoperation is not affected by primary operation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74649085775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74649085775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 20006357

AN - SCOPUS:74649085775

VL - 139

SP - 263

EP - 272

JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 0022-5223

IS - 2

ER -