Overseeing research practice: The case of data editing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines whether and how a particular research practice is overseen and supervised, and by whom. This investigation fills notable gaps in the literature on science, including a lack of emphasis on larger sociopolitical structures, a neglect of regulation, and indifference toward ethics. The author focuses on the oversight of a particular research practice; data editing; which embodies qualities that are intriguing to sociologists of science: invisibility, uncertainty, heterogeneity, and reliance on tacit knowledge. These characteristics pose unique challenges to oversight efforts. An analysis of in-depth interviews with gatekeepers reveals that although the methodological and ethical implications of data editing strategies can be substantial, oversight of such practices falls outside the stages and domains of current gatekeeping activity. These findings serve as the basis for recommendations to ensure data integrity while maintaining the professional autonomy of researchers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)605-630
Number of pages26
JournalScience Technology and Human Values
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

research practice
gatekeeper
science
sociologist
integrity
neglect
autonomy
moral philosophy
uncertainty
regulation
lack
interview
Research Practice
Editing
Oversight
Gatekeeping
Uncertainty
In-depth Interviews
Invisibility
Autonomy

Keywords

  • Data cleaning
  • Data management
  • Research oversight
  • Scientific regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Overseeing research practice : The case of data editing. / Leahey, Erin E.

In: Science Technology and Human Values, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2008, p. 605-630.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{087c9d075e8d405684735753f9f902e9,
title = "Overseeing research practice: The case of data editing",
abstract = "This article examines whether and how a particular research practice is overseen and supervised, and by whom. This investigation fills notable gaps in the literature on science, including a lack of emphasis on larger sociopolitical structures, a neglect of regulation, and indifference toward ethics. The author focuses on the oversight of a particular research practice; data editing; which embodies qualities that are intriguing to sociologists of science: invisibility, uncertainty, heterogeneity, and reliance on tacit knowledge. These characteristics pose unique challenges to oversight efforts. An analysis of in-depth interviews with gatekeepers reveals that although the methodological and ethical implications of data editing strategies can be substantial, oversight of such practices falls outside the stages and domains of current gatekeeping activity. These findings serve as the basis for recommendations to ensure data integrity while maintaining the professional autonomy of researchers.",
keywords = "Data cleaning, Data management, Research oversight, Scientific regulation",
author = "Leahey, {Erin E}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1177/0162243907306702",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "605--630",
journal = "Science Technology and Human Values",
issn = "0162-2439",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overseeing research practice

T2 - The case of data editing

AU - Leahey, Erin E

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This article examines whether and how a particular research practice is overseen and supervised, and by whom. This investigation fills notable gaps in the literature on science, including a lack of emphasis on larger sociopolitical structures, a neglect of regulation, and indifference toward ethics. The author focuses on the oversight of a particular research practice; data editing; which embodies qualities that are intriguing to sociologists of science: invisibility, uncertainty, heterogeneity, and reliance on tacit knowledge. These characteristics pose unique challenges to oversight efforts. An analysis of in-depth interviews with gatekeepers reveals that although the methodological and ethical implications of data editing strategies can be substantial, oversight of such practices falls outside the stages and domains of current gatekeeping activity. These findings serve as the basis for recommendations to ensure data integrity while maintaining the professional autonomy of researchers.

AB - This article examines whether and how a particular research practice is overseen and supervised, and by whom. This investigation fills notable gaps in the literature on science, including a lack of emphasis on larger sociopolitical structures, a neglect of regulation, and indifference toward ethics. The author focuses on the oversight of a particular research practice; data editing; which embodies qualities that are intriguing to sociologists of science: invisibility, uncertainty, heterogeneity, and reliance on tacit knowledge. These characteristics pose unique challenges to oversight efforts. An analysis of in-depth interviews with gatekeepers reveals that although the methodological and ethical implications of data editing strategies can be substantial, oversight of such practices falls outside the stages and domains of current gatekeeping activity. These findings serve as the basis for recommendations to ensure data integrity while maintaining the professional autonomy of researchers.

KW - Data cleaning

KW - Data management

KW - Research oversight

KW - Scientific regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48949090091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48949090091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0162243907306702

DO - 10.1177/0162243907306702

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:48949090091

VL - 33

SP - 605

EP - 630

JO - Science Technology and Human Values

JF - Science Technology and Human Values

SN - 0162-2439

IS - 5

ER -