Packing systematics and structural relationships of the new copper molybdate markascherite and related minerals

Richard M. Thompson, Hexiong Yang, Robert T Downs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The structural relationships between the new mineral markascherite, ideally Cu 3(MoO 4)(OH) 4, and the related minerals szenicsite, antlerite, deloryite, flinkite, retzian, and cahnite are analyzed using hypothetical ideal closest-packed equivalents. Markascherite and the first three related minerals are based on cubic closest-packing (CCP) of anions, flinkite is based on stacking sequence ABAC, and retzian and cahnite are based on hexagonal closest-packing (HCP). However, models that are more realistic than those based on CP can be constructed for retzian and cahnite using small but systematic alterations of CP monolayers. A regular pattern of slight dislocations of some of the spheres in the monolayers creates dodecahedral interstitial sites when the monolayers are stacked, a feature not seen in perfect CP. The use of ideal crystals removes all distortion from polyhedra in closest-packed minerals, allowing for comparison of structural similarities and differences. CCP minerals can have up to four nonequivalent stacking directions. Corresponding stacking directions in the minerals of interest are identified and used to compare the layers of cation coordination polyhedra perpendicular to these zones or face poles (stacking directions are presented in both direct space and reciprocal space). Such layers are natural structural subunits and provide insight into the relationships among these minerals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1977-1986
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Mineralogist
Volume97
Issue number11-12
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

molybdates
Minerals
Copper
minerals
copper
stacking
mineral
Monolayers
polyhedrons
new mineral
dislocation
molybdate
anion
cation
Anions
Cations
Poles
interstitials
crystal
poles

Keywords

  • Antlerite
  • Cahnite
  • Closest-packing
  • Deloryite
  • Flinkite
  • Markascherite
  • Retzian
  • Szenicsite

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Geophysics

Cite this

Packing systematics and structural relationships of the new copper molybdate markascherite and related minerals. / Thompson, Richard M.; Yang, Hexiong; Downs, Robert T.

In: American Mineralogist, Vol. 97, No. 11-12, 11.2012, p. 1977-1986.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c7b926a9fc140eaa9d2c19a80e4fc6d,
title = "Packing systematics and structural relationships of the new copper molybdate markascherite and related minerals",
abstract = "The structural relationships between the new mineral markascherite, ideally Cu 3(MoO 4)(OH) 4, and the related minerals szenicsite, antlerite, deloryite, flinkite, retzian, and cahnite are analyzed using hypothetical ideal closest-packed equivalents. Markascherite and the first three related minerals are based on cubic closest-packing (CCP) of anions, flinkite is based on stacking sequence ABAC, and retzian and cahnite are based on hexagonal closest-packing (HCP). However, models that are more realistic than those based on CP can be constructed for retzian and cahnite using small but systematic alterations of CP monolayers. A regular pattern of slight dislocations of some of the spheres in the monolayers creates dodecahedral interstitial sites when the monolayers are stacked, a feature not seen in perfect CP. The use of ideal crystals removes all distortion from polyhedra in closest-packed minerals, allowing for comparison of structural similarities and differences. CCP minerals can have up to four nonequivalent stacking directions. Corresponding stacking directions in the minerals of interest are identified and used to compare the layers of cation coordination polyhedra perpendicular to these zones or face poles (stacking directions are presented in both direct space and reciprocal space). Such layers are natural structural subunits and provide insight into the relationships among these minerals.",
keywords = "Antlerite, Cahnite, Closest-packing, Deloryite, Flinkite, Markascherite, Retzian, Szenicsite",
author = "Thompson, {Richard M.} and Hexiong Yang and Downs, {Robert T}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.2138/am.2012.4128",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "1977--1986",
journal = "American Mineralogist",
issn = "0003-004X",
publisher = "Mineralogical Society of America",
number = "11-12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Packing systematics and structural relationships of the new copper molybdate markascherite and related minerals

AU - Thompson, Richard M.

AU - Yang, Hexiong

AU - Downs, Robert T

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - The structural relationships between the new mineral markascherite, ideally Cu 3(MoO 4)(OH) 4, and the related minerals szenicsite, antlerite, deloryite, flinkite, retzian, and cahnite are analyzed using hypothetical ideal closest-packed equivalents. Markascherite and the first three related minerals are based on cubic closest-packing (CCP) of anions, flinkite is based on stacking sequence ABAC, and retzian and cahnite are based on hexagonal closest-packing (HCP). However, models that are more realistic than those based on CP can be constructed for retzian and cahnite using small but systematic alterations of CP monolayers. A regular pattern of slight dislocations of some of the spheres in the monolayers creates dodecahedral interstitial sites when the monolayers are stacked, a feature not seen in perfect CP. The use of ideal crystals removes all distortion from polyhedra in closest-packed minerals, allowing for comparison of structural similarities and differences. CCP minerals can have up to four nonequivalent stacking directions. Corresponding stacking directions in the minerals of interest are identified and used to compare the layers of cation coordination polyhedra perpendicular to these zones or face poles (stacking directions are presented in both direct space and reciprocal space). Such layers are natural structural subunits and provide insight into the relationships among these minerals.

AB - The structural relationships between the new mineral markascherite, ideally Cu 3(MoO 4)(OH) 4, and the related minerals szenicsite, antlerite, deloryite, flinkite, retzian, and cahnite are analyzed using hypothetical ideal closest-packed equivalents. Markascherite and the first three related minerals are based on cubic closest-packing (CCP) of anions, flinkite is based on stacking sequence ABAC, and retzian and cahnite are based on hexagonal closest-packing (HCP). However, models that are more realistic than those based on CP can be constructed for retzian and cahnite using small but systematic alterations of CP monolayers. A regular pattern of slight dislocations of some of the spheres in the monolayers creates dodecahedral interstitial sites when the monolayers are stacked, a feature not seen in perfect CP. The use of ideal crystals removes all distortion from polyhedra in closest-packed minerals, allowing for comparison of structural similarities and differences. CCP minerals can have up to four nonequivalent stacking directions. Corresponding stacking directions in the minerals of interest are identified and used to compare the layers of cation coordination polyhedra perpendicular to these zones or face poles (stacking directions are presented in both direct space and reciprocal space). Such layers are natural structural subunits and provide insight into the relationships among these minerals.

KW - Antlerite

KW - Cahnite

KW - Closest-packing

KW - Deloryite

KW - Flinkite

KW - Markascherite

KW - Retzian

KW - Szenicsite

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868558023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868558023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2138/am.2012.4128

DO - 10.2138/am.2012.4128

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84868558023

VL - 97

SP - 1977

EP - 1986

JO - American Mineralogist

JF - American Mineralogist

SN - 0003-004X

IS - 11-12

ER -