Paleolithic Archeology in Turkey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Paleolithic prehistory of Turkey is potentially of enormous interest to paleoanthropologists. Anatolia is the most direct land route into Europe from the Levantine corridor and, more distally, from Africa. Repeated movements of human populations from Africa into Eurasia, and perhaps In the opposite direction as well, reconstructed on the basis of genetic evidence, 1-6 would surely have left traces in the archeological record of Anatolia. In principle, the spread of exogenous populations through the Anatolian peninsula in the past should be reflected in the appearance of new kinds of archeological complexes with evidence of links to population sources in the south (the Levant and Africa). Gene flow, occurring as a result of increased interaction between more established populations, would have a different archeological signature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)198-210
Number of pages13
JournalEvolutionary Anthropology
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Paleolithic
archaeology
Turkey
Turkey (country)
Eurasia
human population
gene flow
prehistory
evidence
Africa
interaction

Keywords

  • Anatolla
  • Pleistocene

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Paleolithic Archeology in Turkey. / Kuhn, Steven L.

In: Evolutionary Anthropology, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2002, p. 198-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c55eea79ce92427cbcd307a142998d1f,
title = "Paleolithic Archeology in Turkey",
abstract = "The Paleolithic prehistory of Turkey is potentially of enormous interest to paleoanthropologists. Anatolia is the most direct land route into Europe from the Levantine corridor and, more distally, from Africa. Repeated movements of human populations from Africa into Eurasia, and perhaps In the opposite direction as well, reconstructed on the basis of genetic evidence, 1-6 would surely have left traces in the archeological record of Anatolia. In principle, the spread of exogenous populations through the Anatolian peninsula in the past should be reflected in the appearance of new kinds of archeological complexes with evidence of links to population sources in the south (the Levant and Africa). Gene flow, occurring as a result of increased interaction between more established populations, would have a different archeological signature.",
keywords = "Anatolla, Pleistocene",
author = "Kuhn, {Steven L}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1002/evan.10033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "198--210",
journal = "Evolutionary Anthropology",
issn = "1060-1538",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paleolithic Archeology in Turkey

AU - Kuhn, Steven L

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The Paleolithic prehistory of Turkey is potentially of enormous interest to paleoanthropologists. Anatolia is the most direct land route into Europe from the Levantine corridor and, more distally, from Africa. Repeated movements of human populations from Africa into Eurasia, and perhaps In the opposite direction as well, reconstructed on the basis of genetic evidence, 1-6 would surely have left traces in the archeological record of Anatolia. In principle, the spread of exogenous populations through the Anatolian peninsula in the past should be reflected in the appearance of new kinds of archeological complexes with evidence of links to population sources in the south (the Levant and Africa). Gene flow, occurring as a result of increased interaction between more established populations, would have a different archeological signature.

AB - The Paleolithic prehistory of Turkey is potentially of enormous interest to paleoanthropologists. Anatolia is the most direct land route into Europe from the Levantine corridor and, more distally, from Africa. Repeated movements of human populations from Africa into Eurasia, and perhaps In the opposite direction as well, reconstructed on the basis of genetic evidence, 1-6 would surely have left traces in the archeological record of Anatolia. In principle, the spread of exogenous populations through the Anatolian peninsula in the past should be reflected in the appearance of new kinds of archeological complexes with evidence of links to population sources in the south (the Levant and Africa). Gene flow, occurring as a result of increased interaction between more established populations, would have a different archeological signature.

KW - Anatolla

KW - Pleistocene

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036406775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036406775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/evan.10033

DO - 10.1002/evan.10033

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 198

EP - 210

JO - Evolutionary Anthropology

JF - Evolutionary Anthropology

SN - 1060-1538

IS - 5

ER -