Paolo Soleri and the aesthetics of irreversibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay examines the designs and writings of the architect Paolo Soleri in the context of technologically oriented post-war architectural discourse. It seeks to demonstrate that not only was Soleri aware of the ideas gleaned by his contemporaries from the fields of cybernetics, systems theory and ecology, but that he had assimilated them to his own philosophy about the built environment as an evolutionary mechanism. Within that framework, aesthetics and the material nature of form became central to his thinking, but also became the aspects of his work that marginalised him vis a vis the architectural vanguard of the 1960s and 1970s. But the systems within which Soleri inscribed architectural form were very much in line with the new models of science and aesthetics being elaborated in the decades following the Second World War, and can be understood as part of a lineage of alternative materialist thought, including the work of Henri Bergson, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Ilya Prigogine and Gilles Deleuze.1 Form follows function is a planetary lie. Paolo Soleri.2

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)781-808
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Architecture
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

Cybernetics
System theory
Ecology
Irreversibility
Paolo Soleri
Aesthetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Architecture

Cite this

Paolo Soleri and the aesthetics of irreversibility. / Busbea, Larry D.

In: Journal of Architecture, Vol. 18, No. 6, 01.12.2013, p. 781-808.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3142f1d3a479448687ad8dd23e15fdbc,
title = "Paolo Soleri and the aesthetics of irreversibility",
abstract = "This essay examines the designs and writings of the architect Paolo Soleri in the context of technologically oriented post-war architectural discourse. It seeks to demonstrate that not only was Soleri aware of the ideas gleaned by his contemporaries from the fields of cybernetics, systems theory and ecology, but that he had assimilated them to his own philosophy about the built environment as an evolutionary mechanism. Within that framework, aesthetics and the material nature of form became central to his thinking, but also became the aspects of his work that marginalised him vis a vis the architectural vanguard of the 1960s and 1970s. But the systems within which Soleri inscribed architectural form were very much in line with the new models of science and aesthetics being elaborated in the decades following the Second World War, and can be understood as part of a lineage of alternative materialist thought, including the work of Henri Bergson, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Ilya Prigogine and Gilles Deleuze.1 Form follows function is a planetary lie. Paolo Soleri.2",
author = "Busbea, {Larry D}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13602365.2013.858271",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "781--808",
journal = "Journal of Architecture",
issn = "1360-2365",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paolo Soleri and the aesthetics of irreversibility

AU - Busbea, Larry D

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - This essay examines the designs and writings of the architect Paolo Soleri in the context of technologically oriented post-war architectural discourse. It seeks to demonstrate that not only was Soleri aware of the ideas gleaned by his contemporaries from the fields of cybernetics, systems theory and ecology, but that he had assimilated them to his own philosophy about the built environment as an evolutionary mechanism. Within that framework, aesthetics and the material nature of form became central to his thinking, but also became the aspects of his work that marginalised him vis a vis the architectural vanguard of the 1960s and 1970s. But the systems within which Soleri inscribed architectural form were very much in line with the new models of science and aesthetics being elaborated in the decades following the Second World War, and can be understood as part of a lineage of alternative materialist thought, including the work of Henri Bergson, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Ilya Prigogine and Gilles Deleuze.1 Form follows function is a planetary lie. Paolo Soleri.2

AB - This essay examines the designs and writings of the architect Paolo Soleri in the context of technologically oriented post-war architectural discourse. It seeks to demonstrate that not only was Soleri aware of the ideas gleaned by his contemporaries from the fields of cybernetics, systems theory and ecology, but that he had assimilated them to his own philosophy about the built environment as an evolutionary mechanism. Within that framework, aesthetics and the material nature of form became central to his thinking, but also became the aspects of his work that marginalised him vis a vis the architectural vanguard of the 1960s and 1970s. But the systems within which Soleri inscribed architectural form were very much in line with the new models of science and aesthetics being elaborated in the decades following the Second World War, and can be understood as part of a lineage of alternative materialist thought, including the work of Henri Bergson, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Ilya Prigogine and Gilles Deleuze.1 Form follows function is a planetary lie. Paolo Soleri.2

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890373273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890373273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13602365.2013.858271

DO - 10.1080/13602365.2013.858271

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84890373273

VL - 18

SP - 781

EP - 808

JO - Journal of Architecture

JF - Journal of Architecture

SN - 1360-2365

IS - 6

ER -