Parameters as trait indicators: Exploring a complementary neurocomputational approach to conceptualizing and measuring trait differences in emotional intelligence

Ryan Smith, Anna Alkozei, William Killgore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Current assessments of trait emotional intelligence (EI) rely on self-report inventories. While this approach has seen considerable success, a complementary approach allowing objective assessment of EI-relevant traits would provide some potential advantages. Among others, one potential advantage is that it would aid in emerging efforts to assess the brain basis of trait EI, where self-reported competency levels do not always match real-world behavior. In this paper, we review recent experimental paradigms in computational cognitive neuroscience (CCN), which allow behavioral estimates of individual differences in range of parameter values within computational models of neurocognitive processes. Based on this review, we illustrate how several of these parameters appear to correspond well to EI-relevant traits (i.e., differences in mood stability, stress vulnerability, self-control, and flexibility, among others). In contrast, although estimated objectively, these parameters do not correspond well to the optimal performance abilities assessed within competing "ability models" of EI. We suggest that adapting this approach from CCN-by treating parameter value estimates as objective trait EI measures-could (1) provide novel research directions, (2) aid in characterizing the neural basis of trait EI, and (3) offer a promising complementary assessment method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number848
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume10
Issue numberAPR
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Emotional Intelligence
Aptitude
Individuality
Self Report
Equipment and Supplies
Brain
Research

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Bayesian brain
  • Computational modeling
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Reinforcement learning
  • Trait emotional intelligence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{08dea6c9df2a48229d9a1e1ff5be2f55,
title = "Parameters as trait indicators: Exploring a complementary neurocomputational approach to conceptualizing and measuring trait differences in emotional intelligence",
abstract = "Current assessments of trait emotional intelligence (EI) rely on self-report inventories. While this approach has seen considerable success, a complementary approach allowing objective assessment of EI-relevant traits would provide some potential advantages. Among others, one potential advantage is that it would aid in emerging efforts to assess the brain basis of trait EI, where self-reported competency levels do not always match real-world behavior. In this paper, we review recent experimental paradigms in computational cognitive neuroscience (CCN), which allow behavioral estimates of individual differences in range of parameter values within computational models of neurocognitive processes. Based on this review, we illustrate how several of these parameters appear to correspond well to EI-relevant traits (i.e., differences in mood stability, stress vulnerability, self-control, and flexibility, among others). In contrast, although estimated objectively, these parameters do not correspond well to the optimal performance abilities assessed within competing {"}ability models{"} of EI. We suggest that adapting this approach from CCN-by treating parameter value estimates as objective trait EI measures-could (1) provide novel research directions, (2) aid in characterizing the neural basis of trait EI, and (3) offer a promising complementary assessment method.",
keywords = "Assessment, Bayesian brain, Computational modeling, Computational neuroscience, Reinforcement learning, Trait emotional intelligence",
author = "Ryan Smith and Anna Alkozei and William Killgore",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00848",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "APR",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parameters as trait indicators

T2 - Exploring a complementary neurocomputational approach to conceptualizing and measuring trait differences in emotional intelligence

AU - Smith, Ryan

AU - Alkozei, Anna

AU - Killgore, William

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Current assessments of trait emotional intelligence (EI) rely on self-report inventories. While this approach has seen considerable success, a complementary approach allowing objective assessment of EI-relevant traits would provide some potential advantages. Among others, one potential advantage is that it would aid in emerging efforts to assess the brain basis of trait EI, where self-reported competency levels do not always match real-world behavior. In this paper, we review recent experimental paradigms in computational cognitive neuroscience (CCN), which allow behavioral estimates of individual differences in range of parameter values within computational models of neurocognitive processes. Based on this review, we illustrate how several of these parameters appear to correspond well to EI-relevant traits (i.e., differences in mood stability, stress vulnerability, self-control, and flexibility, among others). In contrast, although estimated objectively, these parameters do not correspond well to the optimal performance abilities assessed within competing "ability models" of EI. We suggest that adapting this approach from CCN-by treating parameter value estimates as objective trait EI measures-could (1) provide novel research directions, (2) aid in characterizing the neural basis of trait EI, and (3) offer a promising complementary assessment method.

AB - Current assessments of trait emotional intelligence (EI) rely on self-report inventories. While this approach has seen considerable success, a complementary approach allowing objective assessment of EI-relevant traits would provide some potential advantages. Among others, one potential advantage is that it would aid in emerging efforts to assess the brain basis of trait EI, where self-reported competency levels do not always match real-world behavior. In this paper, we review recent experimental paradigms in computational cognitive neuroscience (CCN), which allow behavioral estimates of individual differences in range of parameter values within computational models of neurocognitive processes. Based on this review, we illustrate how several of these parameters appear to correspond well to EI-relevant traits (i.e., differences in mood stability, stress vulnerability, self-control, and flexibility, among others). In contrast, although estimated objectively, these parameters do not correspond well to the optimal performance abilities assessed within competing "ability models" of EI. We suggest that adapting this approach from CCN-by treating parameter value estimates as objective trait EI measures-could (1) provide novel research directions, (2) aid in characterizing the neural basis of trait EI, and (3) offer a promising complementary assessment method.

KW - Assessment

KW - Bayesian brain

KW - Computational modeling

KW - Computational neuroscience

KW - Reinforcement learning

KW - Trait emotional intelligence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065140439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065140439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00848

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00848

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065140439

VL - 10

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - APR

M1 - 848

ER -