Parents’ evaluations of the effects of the 3M/house cochlear implant on children

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A questionnaire was used to obtain parents’ opinions o their children’s 3M/House cochlear implant. Responses were received from parents of 132 children aged 3 through 17. Seventy-five percent of the parents were satisfied overall with the implant; 25% were not. The parents were more positive about the implant than they felt their children were. Fifty-seven percent, 34%, and 9% of the parents reported that the implant performed better, the same, or worse, respectively, than their implant counselors said it would. Almost all of the parents (98%) said they would recommend the implant to other parents. The parents thought that the effect of the implant on environmental sound perception and speech production was superior to its effect on speech perception. Environmental sound perception was a more substantial predictor of parental satisfaction than was speech perception or speech production. About half of the parents felt that the size and cords of the external processor were problematic. Adolescent children wore their implants less than preadolescent children. It was concluded that the majority of the parents thought the 3M/House cochlear implant provided realworld benefits for their children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-381
Number of pages7
JournalEar and Hearing
Volume11
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Parents
Speech Perception
Phonetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Parents’ evaluations of the effects of the 3M/house cochlear implant on children. / Cunningham, James K.

In: Ear and Hearing, Vol. 11, No. 5, 1990, p. 375-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4bf304ea488a4c118bd5a8d6be2205eb,
title = "Parents’ evaluations of the effects of the 3M/house cochlear implant on children",
abstract = "A questionnaire was used to obtain parents’ opinions o their children’s 3M/House cochlear implant. Responses were received from parents of 132 children aged 3 through 17. Seventy-five percent of the parents were satisfied overall with the implant; 25{\%} were not. The parents were more positive about the implant than they felt their children were. Fifty-seven percent, 34{\%}, and 9{\%} of the parents reported that the implant performed better, the same, or worse, respectively, than their implant counselors said it would. Almost all of the parents (98{\%}) said they would recommend the implant to other parents. The parents thought that the effect of the implant on environmental sound perception and speech production was superior to its effect on speech perception. Environmental sound perception was a more substantial predictor of parental satisfaction than was speech perception or speech production. About half of the parents felt that the size and cords of the external processor were problematic. Adolescent children wore their implants less than preadolescent children. It was concluded that the majority of the parents thought the 3M/House cochlear implant provided realworld benefits for their children.",
author = "Cunningham, {James K}",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "375--381",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parents’ evaluations of the effects of the 3M/house cochlear implant on children

AU - Cunningham, James K

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - A questionnaire was used to obtain parents’ opinions o their children’s 3M/House cochlear implant. Responses were received from parents of 132 children aged 3 through 17. Seventy-five percent of the parents were satisfied overall with the implant; 25% were not. The parents were more positive about the implant than they felt their children were. Fifty-seven percent, 34%, and 9% of the parents reported that the implant performed better, the same, or worse, respectively, than their implant counselors said it would. Almost all of the parents (98%) said they would recommend the implant to other parents. The parents thought that the effect of the implant on environmental sound perception and speech production was superior to its effect on speech perception. Environmental sound perception was a more substantial predictor of parental satisfaction than was speech perception or speech production. About half of the parents felt that the size and cords of the external processor were problematic. Adolescent children wore their implants less than preadolescent children. It was concluded that the majority of the parents thought the 3M/House cochlear implant provided realworld benefits for their children.

AB - A questionnaire was used to obtain parents’ opinions o their children’s 3M/House cochlear implant. Responses were received from parents of 132 children aged 3 through 17. Seventy-five percent of the parents were satisfied overall with the implant; 25% were not. The parents were more positive about the implant than they felt their children were. Fifty-seven percent, 34%, and 9% of the parents reported that the implant performed better, the same, or worse, respectively, than their implant counselors said it would. Almost all of the parents (98%) said they would recommend the implant to other parents. The parents thought that the effect of the implant on environmental sound perception and speech production was superior to its effect on speech perception. Environmental sound perception was a more substantial predictor of parental satisfaction than was speech perception or speech production. About half of the parents felt that the size and cords of the external processor were problematic. Adolescent children wore their implants less than preadolescent children. It was concluded that the majority of the parents thought the 3M/House cochlear implant provided realworld benefits for their children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025048054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025048054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2262088

AN - SCOPUS:0025048054

VL - 11

SP - 375

EP - 381

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 5

ER -