Participation of non-dominant students in argumentation in the mathematics classroom

Marta Civil, Roberta Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article focuses on argumentation in mathematics classrooms in two different geographic contexts, the US and New Zealand. Drawing on data from a case with immigrant students (Pāsifika) in NZ and a case with Mexican American students in the US, we argue for the need to study the concept of argumentation through a cultural and language lens. Our analysis across the two cases points to common features that supported students’ engagement in argumentation. Building relationships and encouraging and supporting students to be themselves are seen as resources for argumentation. The similarities across two very different contexts are striking. As we think of how to develop environments that support non-dominant students’ participation in mathematical argumentation, we may want to learn from and build on students’ cultural ways of being.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-312
Number of pages17
JournalIntercultural Education
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2015

Fingerprint

argumentation
mathematics
classroom
participation
student
New Zealand
immigrant
language
resources

Keywords

  • linguistic diversity
  • mathematical reasoning
  • mathematics education
  • non-dominant students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Participation of non-dominant students in argumentation in the mathematics classroom. / Civil, Marta; Hunter, Roberta.

In: Intercultural Education, Vol. 26, No. 4, 04.07.2015, p. 296-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{98e231b8f22e4b74b94204154687da38,
title = "Participation of non-dominant students in argumentation in the mathematics classroom",
abstract = "This article focuses on argumentation in mathematics classrooms in two different geographic contexts, the US and New Zealand. Drawing on data from a case with immigrant students (Pāsifika) in NZ and a case with Mexican American students in the US, we argue for the need to study the concept of argumentation through a cultural and language lens. Our analysis across the two cases points to common features that supported students’ engagement in argumentation. Building relationships and encouraging and supporting students to be themselves are seen as resources for argumentation. The similarities across two very different contexts are striking. As we think of how to develop environments that support non-dominant students’ participation in mathematical argumentation, we may want to learn from and build on students’ cultural ways of being.",
keywords = "linguistic diversity, mathematical reasoning, mathematics education, non-dominant students",
author = "Marta Civil and Roberta Hunter",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/14675986.2015.1071755",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "296--312",
journal = "Intercultural Education",
issn = "1467-5986",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participation of non-dominant students in argumentation in the mathematics classroom

AU - Civil, Marta

AU - Hunter, Roberta

PY - 2015/7/4

Y1 - 2015/7/4

N2 - This article focuses on argumentation in mathematics classrooms in two different geographic contexts, the US and New Zealand. Drawing on data from a case with immigrant students (Pāsifika) in NZ and a case with Mexican American students in the US, we argue for the need to study the concept of argumentation through a cultural and language lens. Our analysis across the two cases points to common features that supported students’ engagement in argumentation. Building relationships and encouraging and supporting students to be themselves are seen as resources for argumentation. The similarities across two very different contexts are striking. As we think of how to develop environments that support non-dominant students’ participation in mathematical argumentation, we may want to learn from and build on students’ cultural ways of being.

AB - This article focuses on argumentation in mathematics classrooms in two different geographic contexts, the US and New Zealand. Drawing on data from a case with immigrant students (Pāsifika) in NZ and a case with Mexican American students in the US, we argue for the need to study the concept of argumentation through a cultural and language lens. Our analysis across the two cases points to common features that supported students’ engagement in argumentation. Building relationships and encouraging and supporting students to be themselves are seen as resources for argumentation. The similarities across two very different contexts are striking. As we think of how to develop environments that support non-dominant students’ participation in mathematical argumentation, we may want to learn from and build on students’ cultural ways of being.

KW - linguistic diversity

KW - mathematical reasoning

KW - mathematics education

KW - non-dominant students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949804373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949804373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14675986.2015.1071755

DO - 10.1080/14675986.2015.1071755

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 296

EP - 312

JO - Intercultural Education

JF - Intercultural Education

SN - 1467-5986

IS - 4

ER -