Past, present, and future applications of the auditory middle latency response

Frank Musiek, Nathan A. Geurkink, Dudley J. Weideh, Karen Donnelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For many years (auditory) middle latency response (MLR) reportedly has been an excellent electrophysiological procedure for estimating frequency specific auditory thresholds. Currently the 40 Hz potential, a derivative of the MLR, holds even greater promise for threshold testing. MLR also appears to have potentially valuable applications in the evaluation of functional hearing loss and assessment of higher auditory function. However, MLR is not without controversy. Questions of origin, filtering effects, and its use in pediatric assessment are current issues surrounding applications of MLR. The following article analyzes the values and limitations of MLR within the framework of past, present, and future research and clinical uses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1545-1553
Number of pages9
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume94
Issue number12
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reaction Time
Functional Hearing Loss
Auditory Threshold
Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Musiek, F., Geurkink, N. A., Weideh, D. J., & Donnelly, K. (1984). Past, present, and future applications of the auditory middle latency response. Laryngoscope, 94(12), 1545-1553.

Past, present, and future applications of the auditory middle latency response. / Musiek, Frank; Geurkink, Nathan A.; Weideh, Dudley J.; Donnelly, Karen.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 94, No. 12, 1984, p. 1545-1553.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Musiek, F, Geurkink, NA, Weideh, DJ & Donnelly, K 1984, 'Past, present, and future applications of the auditory middle latency response', Laryngoscope, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 1545-1553.
Musiek, Frank ; Geurkink, Nathan A. ; Weideh, Dudley J. ; Donnelly, Karen. / Past, present, and future applications of the auditory middle latency response. In: Laryngoscope. 1984 ; Vol. 94, No. 12. pp. 1545-1553.
@article{6cccda4ab79e48919027cb7153180b67,
title = "Past, present, and future applications of the auditory middle latency response",
abstract = "For many years (auditory) middle latency response (MLR) reportedly has been an excellent electrophysiological procedure for estimating frequency specific auditory thresholds. Currently the 40 Hz potential, a derivative of the MLR, holds even greater promise for threshold testing. MLR also appears to have potentially valuable applications in the evaluation of functional hearing loss and assessment of higher auditory function. However, MLR is not without controversy. Questions of origin, filtering effects, and its use in pediatric assessment are current issues surrounding applications of MLR. The following article analyzes the values and limitations of MLR within the framework of past, present, and future research and clinical uses.",
author = "Frank Musiek and Geurkink, {Nathan A.} and Weideh, {Dudley J.} and Karen Donnelly",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "1545--1553",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Past, present, and future applications of the auditory middle latency response

AU - Musiek, Frank

AU - Geurkink, Nathan A.

AU - Weideh, Dudley J.

AU - Donnelly, Karen

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - For many years (auditory) middle latency response (MLR) reportedly has been an excellent electrophysiological procedure for estimating frequency specific auditory thresholds. Currently the 40 Hz potential, a derivative of the MLR, holds even greater promise for threshold testing. MLR also appears to have potentially valuable applications in the evaluation of functional hearing loss and assessment of higher auditory function. However, MLR is not without controversy. Questions of origin, filtering effects, and its use in pediatric assessment are current issues surrounding applications of MLR. The following article analyzes the values and limitations of MLR within the framework of past, present, and future research and clinical uses.

AB - For many years (auditory) middle latency response (MLR) reportedly has been an excellent electrophysiological procedure for estimating frequency specific auditory thresholds. Currently the 40 Hz potential, a derivative of the MLR, holds even greater promise for threshold testing. MLR also appears to have potentially valuable applications in the evaluation of functional hearing loss and assessment of higher auditory function. However, MLR is not without controversy. Questions of origin, filtering effects, and its use in pediatric assessment are current issues surrounding applications of MLR. The following article analyzes the values and limitations of MLR within the framework of past, present, and future research and clinical uses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021687552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021687552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6503574

AN - SCOPUS:0021687552

VL - 94

SP - 1545

EP - 1553

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 12

ER -