Patients' experiences and perceptions of a consultative model integrative medicine clinic: A qualitative study

Mary S Koithan, Iris R. Bell, Opher Caspi, Lynn Ferro, Victoria Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: A common theme in integrative medicine (IM) is patient-centered partnering in care between patients and providers. Despite the stated ideals, few studies have assessed patients' perspectives on their actual experience in the context of a specific care model. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively explore and compare experiences of cancer and noncancer patients under care in a consultative IM outpatient teaching clinic in the south-western United States. Design: Qualitative study using inductive content analysis of focus group interview transcripts (2 groups of adult patients with cancers of various types and 1 group of chronically ill noncancer patients with mixed diagnoses). Method: Participants were recruited by random selection from a pool of eligible patients. Groups were conducted with patients who had completed their initial conventional cancer treatment and were at least 6 months postconsultation with an IM clinic physician. Transcripts of the audiotaped focus groups were analyzed. Results: Cancer patients (n = 15) and noncancer patients (n = 6) (mean age, 60 years; 77% women) expressed overall satisfaction with IM, emphasizing (1) expansion of treatment options with lower perceived toxicity than conventional therapies, (2) positive experiences of the IM physician as caring and taking time to listen, and (3) improved self-care skills and sense of empowerment. Cancer patients noted positive relationships with their conventional MDs more than did noncancer patients, although both groups appreciated the IM physicians' communication styles. Conclusion: Patients experience a consultative integrative clinic model overall as favorable. The impact on outcomes, costs, and long-term quality of life requires additional study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-184
Number of pages11
JournalIntegrative Cancer Therapies
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Integrative Medicine
Neoplasms
Focus Groups
Physicians
Patient Care
Self Care
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Teaching

Keywords

  • Cancer patients
  • Consultative model
  • Integrative medicine
  • Integrative medicine clinic
  • Models of care
  • Outcomes
  • Qualitative methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Patients' experiences and perceptions of a consultative model integrative medicine clinic : A qualitative study. / Koithan, Mary S; Bell, Iris R.; Caspi, Opher; Ferro, Lynn; Brown, Victoria.

In: Integrative Cancer Therapies, Vol. 6, No. 2, 06.2007, p. 174-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koithan, Mary S ; Bell, Iris R. ; Caspi, Opher ; Ferro, Lynn ; Brown, Victoria. / Patients' experiences and perceptions of a consultative model integrative medicine clinic : A qualitative study. In: Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2007 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 174-184.
@article{93458c4cdc81468d856a9cacff1d0790,
title = "Patients' experiences and perceptions of a consultative model integrative medicine clinic: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Objective: A common theme in integrative medicine (IM) is patient-centered partnering in care between patients and providers. Despite the stated ideals, few studies have assessed patients' perspectives on their actual experience in the context of a specific care model. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively explore and compare experiences of cancer and noncancer patients under care in a consultative IM outpatient teaching clinic in the south-western United States. Design: Qualitative study using inductive content analysis of focus group interview transcripts (2 groups of adult patients with cancers of various types and 1 group of chronically ill noncancer patients with mixed diagnoses). Method: Participants were recruited by random selection from a pool of eligible patients. Groups were conducted with patients who had completed their initial conventional cancer treatment and were at least 6 months postconsultation with an IM clinic physician. Transcripts of the audiotaped focus groups were analyzed. Results: Cancer patients (n = 15) and noncancer patients (n = 6) (mean age, 60 years; 77{\%} women) expressed overall satisfaction with IM, emphasizing (1) expansion of treatment options with lower perceived toxicity than conventional therapies, (2) positive experiences of the IM physician as caring and taking time to listen, and (3) improved self-care skills and sense of empowerment. Cancer patients noted positive relationships with their conventional MDs more than did noncancer patients, although both groups appreciated the IM physicians' communication styles. Conclusion: Patients experience a consultative integrative clinic model overall as favorable. The impact on outcomes, costs, and long-term quality of life requires additional study.",
keywords = "Cancer patients, Consultative model, Integrative medicine, Integrative medicine clinic, Models of care, Outcomes, Qualitative methods",
author = "Koithan, {Mary S} and Bell, {Iris R.} and Opher Caspi and Lynn Ferro and Victoria Brown",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1534735407301992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "174--184",
journal = "Integrative Cancer Therapies",
issn = "1534-7354",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients' experiences and perceptions of a consultative model integrative medicine clinic

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Koithan, Mary S

AU - Bell, Iris R.

AU - Caspi, Opher

AU - Ferro, Lynn

AU - Brown, Victoria

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Objective: A common theme in integrative medicine (IM) is patient-centered partnering in care between patients and providers. Despite the stated ideals, few studies have assessed patients' perspectives on their actual experience in the context of a specific care model. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively explore and compare experiences of cancer and noncancer patients under care in a consultative IM outpatient teaching clinic in the south-western United States. Design: Qualitative study using inductive content analysis of focus group interview transcripts (2 groups of adult patients with cancers of various types and 1 group of chronically ill noncancer patients with mixed diagnoses). Method: Participants were recruited by random selection from a pool of eligible patients. Groups were conducted with patients who had completed their initial conventional cancer treatment and were at least 6 months postconsultation with an IM clinic physician. Transcripts of the audiotaped focus groups were analyzed. Results: Cancer patients (n = 15) and noncancer patients (n = 6) (mean age, 60 years; 77% women) expressed overall satisfaction with IM, emphasizing (1) expansion of treatment options with lower perceived toxicity than conventional therapies, (2) positive experiences of the IM physician as caring and taking time to listen, and (3) improved self-care skills and sense of empowerment. Cancer patients noted positive relationships with their conventional MDs more than did noncancer patients, although both groups appreciated the IM physicians' communication styles. Conclusion: Patients experience a consultative integrative clinic model overall as favorable. The impact on outcomes, costs, and long-term quality of life requires additional study.

AB - Objective: A common theme in integrative medicine (IM) is patient-centered partnering in care between patients and providers. Despite the stated ideals, few studies have assessed patients' perspectives on their actual experience in the context of a specific care model. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively explore and compare experiences of cancer and noncancer patients under care in a consultative IM outpatient teaching clinic in the south-western United States. Design: Qualitative study using inductive content analysis of focus group interview transcripts (2 groups of adult patients with cancers of various types and 1 group of chronically ill noncancer patients with mixed diagnoses). Method: Participants were recruited by random selection from a pool of eligible patients. Groups were conducted with patients who had completed their initial conventional cancer treatment and were at least 6 months postconsultation with an IM clinic physician. Transcripts of the audiotaped focus groups were analyzed. Results: Cancer patients (n = 15) and noncancer patients (n = 6) (mean age, 60 years; 77% women) expressed overall satisfaction with IM, emphasizing (1) expansion of treatment options with lower perceived toxicity than conventional therapies, (2) positive experiences of the IM physician as caring and taking time to listen, and (3) improved self-care skills and sense of empowerment. Cancer patients noted positive relationships with their conventional MDs more than did noncancer patients, although both groups appreciated the IM physicians' communication styles. Conclusion: Patients experience a consultative integrative clinic model overall as favorable. The impact on outcomes, costs, and long-term quality of life requires additional study.

KW - Cancer patients

KW - Consultative model

KW - Integrative medicine

KW - Integrative medicine clinic

KW - Models of care

KW - Outcomes

KW - Qualitative methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249913965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249913965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1534735407301992

DO - 10.1177/1534735407301992

M3 - Article

C2 - 17548796

AN - SCOPUS:34249913965

VL - 6

SP - 174

EP - 184

JO - Integrative Cancer Therapies

JF - Integrative Cancer Therapies

SN - 1534-7354

IS - 2

ER -