Paying for performance and the social relations of health care provision: An anthropological perspective

Priscilla Magrath, Mark Nichter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past decade, the use of financial incentive schemes has become a popular form of intervention to boost performance in the health sector. Often termed "paying for performance" or P4P, they involve "... the transfer of money or material goods conditional upon taking a measurable action or achieving a predetermined performance target" (Eldridge & Palmer, 2009, p.160). P4P appear to bring about rapid improvements in some measured indicators of provider performance, at least over the short term. However, evidence for the impact of these schemes on the wider health system remains limited, and even where evaluations have been positive, unintended effects have been identified. These have included: "gaming" the system; crowding out of "intrinsic motivation"; a drop in morale where schemes are viewed as unfair; and the undermining of social relations and teamwork through competition, envy or ill feeling. Less information is available concerning how these processes occur, and how they vary across social and cultural contexts. While recognizing the potential of P4P, the authors argue for greater care in adapting schemes to particular local contexts. We suggest that insights from social science theory coupled with the focused ethnographic methods of anthropology can contribute to the critical assessment of P4P schemes and to their adaptation to particular social environments and reward systems. We highlight the need for monitoring P4P schemes in relation to worker motivation and the quality of social relations, since these have implications both for health sector performance over the long term and for the success and sustainability of a P4P scheme. Suggestions are made for ethnographies, undertaken in collaboration with local stakeholders, to assess readiness for P4P; package rewards in ways that minimize perverse responses; identify process variables for monitoring and evaluation; and build sustainability into program design through linkage with complementary reforms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1778-1785
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume75
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Anthropology
Social Relations
Motivation
health care
Delivery of Health Care
Reward
Health
Cultural Anthropology
performance
Morale
Crowding
Social Environment
Social Sciences
Program Evaluation
reward
transfer of money
health
sustainability
social science theory
monitoring

Keywords

  • Anthropology
  • Ethnography
  • Health systems
  • Monitoring and evaluation
  • Motivation
  • Paying for performance in developing countries
  • Social relations
  • Trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Paying for performance and the social relations of health care provision : An anthropological perspective. / Magrath, Priscilla; Nichter, Mark.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 75, No. 10, 11.2012, p. 1778-1785.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{28ee843b97c349438e2c8477ae2b98cc,
title = "Paying for performance and the social relations of health care provision: An anthropological perspective",
abstract = "Over the past decade, the use of financial incentive schemes has become a popular form of intervention to boost performance in the health sector. Often termed {"}paying for performance{"} or P4P, they involve {"}... the transfer of money or material goods conditional upon taking a measurable action or achieving a predetermined performance target{"} (Eldridge & Palmer, 2009, p.160). P4P appear to bring about rapid improvements in some measured indicators of provider performance, at least over the short term. However, evidence for the impact of these schemes on the wider health system remains limited, and even where evaluations have been positive, unintended effects have been identified. These have included: {"}gaming{"} the system; crowding out of {"}intrinsic motivation{"}; a drop in morale where schemes are viewed as unfair; and the undermining of social relations and teamwork through competition, envy or ill feeling. Less information is available concerning how these processes occur, and how they vary across social and cultural contexts. While recognizing the potential of P4P, the authors argue for greater care in adapting schemes to particular local contexts. We suggest that insights from social science theory coupled with the focused ethnographic methods of anthropology can contribute to the critical assessment of P4P schemes and to their adaptation to particular social environments and reward systems. We highlight the need for monitoring P4P schemes in relation to worker motivation and the quality of social relations, since these have implications both for health sector performance over the long term and for the success and sustainability of a P4P scheme. Suggestions are made for ethnographies, undertaken in collaboration with local stakeholders, to assess readiness for P4P; package rewards in ways that minimize perverse responses; identify process variables for monitoring and evaluation; and build sustainability into program design through linkage with complementary reforms.",
keywords = "Anthropology, Ethnography, Health systems, Monitoring and evaluation, Motivation, Paying for performance in developing countries, Social relations, Trust",
author = "Priscilla Magrath and Mark Nichter",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "1778--1785",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paying for performance and the social relations of health care provision

T2 - An anthropological perspective

AU - Magrath, Priscilla

AU - Nichter, Mark

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Over the past decade, the use of financial incentive schemes has become a popular form of intervention to boost performance in the health sector. Often termed "paying for performance" or P4P, they involve "... the transfer of money or material goods conditional upon taking a measurable action or achieving a predetermined performance target" (Eldridge & Palmer, 2009, p.160). P4P appear to bring about rapid improvements in some measured indicators of provider performance, at least over the short term. However, evidence for the impact of these schemes on the wider health system remains limited, and even where evaluations have been positive, unintended effects have been identified. These have included: "gaming" the system; crowding out of "intrinsic motivation"; a drop in morale where schemes are viewed as unfair; and the undermining of social relations and teamwork through competition, envy or ill feeling. Less information is available concerning how these processes occur, and how they vary across social and cultural contexts. While recognizing the potential of P4P, the authors argue for greater care in adapting schemes to particular local contexts. We suggest that insights from social science theory coupled with the focused ethnographic methods of anthropology can contribute to the critical assessment of P4P schemes and to their adaptation to particular social environments and reward systems. We highlight the need for monitoring P4P schemes in relation to worker motivation and the quality of social relations, since these have implications both for health sector performance over the long term and for the success and sustainability of a P4P scheme. Suggestions are made for ethnographies, undertaken in collaboration with local stakeholders, to assess readiness for P4P; package rewards in ways that minimize perverse responses; identify process variables for monitoring and evaluation; and build sustainability into program design through linkage with complementary reforms.

AB - Over the past decade, the use of financial incentive schemes has become a popular form of intervention to boost performance in the health sector. Often termed "paying for performance" or P4P, they involve "... the transfer of money or material goods conditional upon taking a measurable action or achieving a predetermined performance target" (Eldridge & Palmer, 2009, p.160). P4P appear to bring about rapid improvements in some measured indicators of provider performance, at least over the short term. However, evidence for the impact of these schemes on the wider health system remains limited, and even where evaluations have been positive, unintended effects have been identified. These have included: "gaming" the system; crowding out of "intrinsic motivation"; a drop in morale where schemes are viewed as unfair; and the undermining of social relations and teamwork through competition, envy or ill feeling. Less information is available concerning how these processes occur, and how they vary across social and cultural contexts. While recognizing the potential of P4P, the authors argue for greater care in adapting schemes to particular local contexts. We suggest that insights from social science theory coupled with the focused ethnographic methods of anthropology can contribute to the critical assessment of P4P schemes and to their adaptation to particular social environments and reward systems. We highlight the need for monitoring P4P schemes in relation to worker motivation and the quality of social relations, since these have implications both for health sector performance over the long term and for the success and sustainability of a P4P scheme. Suggestions are made for ethnographies, undertaken in collaboration with local stakeholders, to assess readiness for P4P; package rewards in ways that minimize perverse responses; identify process variables for monitoring and evaluation; and build sustainability into program design through linkage with complementary reforms.

KW - Anthropology

KW - Ethnography

KW - Health systems

KW - Monitoring and evaluation

KW - Motivation

KW - Paying for performance in developing countries

KW - Social relations

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866163381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866163381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.025

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 22921245

AN - SCOPUS:84866163381

VL - 75

SP - 1778

EP - 1785

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 10

ER -