Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field

Daniel Herbst, Alexandre Mas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compare estimates of peer effects on worker output in laboratory experiments and field studies from naturally occurring environments. The mean study-level estimate of a change in a worker's productivity in response to an increase in a co-worker's productivity (γ) is γ = 0.12 (SE = 0.03, nstudies = 34), with a between-study standard deviation τ = 0.16. The mean estimated γ-values are close between laboratory and field studies (γlab - γfield = 0.04, P = 0.55, nlab = 11, nfield = 23), as are estimates of between-study variance τ22lab - τ2field = -0:003, P = 0.89). The small mean difference between laboratory and field estimates holds even after controlling for sample characteristics such as incentive schemes and work complexity (γlab - γfield = 0.03, P = 0.62, nsamples = 46). Laboratory experiments generalize quantitatively in that they provide an accurate description of the mean and variance of productivity spillovers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)545-549
Number of pages5
JournalScience
Volume350
Issue number6260
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 30 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field. / Herbst, Daniel; Mas, Alexandre.

In: Science, Vol. 350, No. 6260, 30.10.2015, p. 545-549.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herbst, Daniel ; Mas, Alexandre. / Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field. In: Science. 2015 ; Vol. 350, No. 6260. pp. 545-549.
@article{b816403e6e3b4055b94e25e731b2d250,
title = "Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field",
abstract = "We compare estimates of peer effects on worker output in laboratory experiments and field studies from naturally occurring environments. The mean study-level estimate of a change in a worker's productivity in response to an increase in a co-worker's productivity (γ) is γ = 0.12 (SE = 0.03, nstudies = 34), with a between-study standard deviation τ = 0.16. The mean estimated γ-values are close between laboratory and field studies (γlab - γfield = 0.04, P = 0.55, nlab = 11, nfield = 23), as are estimates of between-study variance τ2 (τ2lab - τ2field = -0:003, P = 0.89). The small mean difference between laboratory and field estimates holds even after controlling for sample characteristics such as incentive schemes and work complexity (γlab - γfield = 0.03, P = 0.62, nsamples = 46). Laboratory experiments generalize quantitatively in that they provide an accurate description of the mean and variance of productivity spillovers.",
author = "Daniel Herbst and Alexandre Mas",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1126/science.aac9555",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "350",
pages = "545--549",
journal = "Science",
issn = "0036-8075",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",
number = "6260",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field

AU - Herbst, Daniel

AU - Mas, Alexandre

PY - 2015/10/30

Y1 - 2015/10/30

N2 - We compare estimates of peer effects on worker output in laboratory experiments and field studies from naturally occurring environments. The mean study-level estimate of a change in a worker's productivity in response to an increase in a co-worker's productivity (γ) is γ = 0.12 (SE = 0.03, nstudies = 34), with a between-study standard deviation τ = 0.16. The mean estimated γ-values are close between laboratory and field studies (γlab - γfield = 0.04, P = 0.55, nlab = 11, nfield = 23), as are estimates of between-study variance τ2 (τ2lab - τ2field = -0:003, P = 0.89). The small mean difference between laboratory and field estimates holds even after controlling for sample characteristics such as incentive schemes and work complexity (γlab - γfield = 0.03, P = 0.62, nsamples = 46). Laboratory experiments generalize quantitatively in that they provide an accurate description of the mean and variance of productivity spillovers.

AB - We compare estimates of peer effects on worker output in laboratory experiments and field studies from naturally occurring environments. The mean study-level estimate of a change in a worker's productivity in response to an increase in a co-worker's productivity (γ) is γ = 0.12 (SE = 0.03, nstudies = 34), with a between-study standard deviation τ = 0.16. The mean estimated γ-values are close between laboratory and field studies (γlab - γfield = 0.04, P = 0.55, nlab = 11, nfield = 23), as are estimates of between-study variance τ2 (τ2lab - τ2field = -0:003, P = 0.89). The small mean difference between laboratory and field estimates holds even after controlling for sample characteristics such as incentive schemes and work complexity (γlab - γfield = 0.03, P = 0.62, nsamples = 46). Laboratory experiments generalize quantitatively in that they provide an accurate description of the mean and variance of productivity spillovers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945579266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945579266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1126/science.aac9555

DO - 10.1126/science.aac9555

M3 - Article

C2 - 26516281

AN - SCOPUS:84945579266

VL - 350

SP - 545

EP - 549

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

IS - 6260

ER -