Perceptual and Interpretive Error in Diagnostic Radiology—Causes and Potential Solutions

Andrew J. Degnan, Emily H. Ghobadi, Peter Hardy, Elizabeth A Krupinski, Elena P. Scali, Lindsay Stratchko, Adam Ulano, Eric Walker, Ashish P. Wasnik, William F. Auffermann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interpretation of increasingly complex imaging studies involves multiple intricate tasks requiring visual evaluation, cognitive processing, and decision-making. At each stage of this process, there are opportunities for error due to human factors including perceptual and ergonomic conditions. Investigation into the root causes of interpretive error in radiology first began over a century ago. In more recent work, there has been increasing recognition of the limits of human image perception and other human factors and greater acknowledgement of the role of the radiologist's environment in increasing the risk of error. This article reviews the state of research on perceptual and interpretive error in radiology. This article focuses on avenues for further error examination, and strategies for mitigating these errors are discussed. The relationship between artificial intelligence and interpretive error is also considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Errors
Radiology
Human Engineering
Artificial Intelligence
Decision Making
Research

Keywords

  • ergonomics
  • interpretation
  • medical imaging
  • perception
  • radiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Degnan, A. J., Ghobadi, E. H., Hardy, P., Krupinski, E. A., Scali, E. P., Stratchko, L., ... Auffermann, W. F. (Accepted/In press). Perceptual and Interpretive Error in Diagnostic Radiology—Causes and Potential Solutions. Academic Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.11.006

Perceptual and Interpretive Error in Diagnostic Radiology—Causes and Potential Solutions. / Degnan, Andrew J.; Ghobadi, Emily H.; Hardy, Peter; Krupinski, Elizabeth A; Scali, Elena P.; Stratchko, Lindsay; Ulano, Adam; Walker, Eric; Wasnik, Ashish P.; Auffermann, William F.

In: Academic Radiology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Degnan, AJ, Ghobadi, EH, Hardy, P, Krupinski, EA, Scali, EP, Stratchko, L, Ulano, A, Walker, E, Wasnik, AP & Auffermann, WF 2018, 'Perceptual and Interpretive Error in Diagnostic Radiology—Causes and Potential Solutions', Academic Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.11.006
Degnan, Andrew J. ; Ghobadi, Emily H. ; Hardy, Peter ; Krupinski, Elizabeth A ; Scali, Elena P. ; Stratchko, Lindsay ; Ulano, Adam ; Walker, Eric ; Wasnik, Ashish P. ; Auffermann, William F. / Perceptual and Interpretive Error in Diagnostic Radiology—Causes and Potential Solutions. In: Academic Radiology. 2018.
@article{422f7644ce304cb994bb7f79734d9238,
title = "Perceptual and Interpretive Error in Diagnostic Radiology—Causes and Potential Solutions",
abstract = "Interpretation of increasingly complex imaging studies involves multiple intricate tasks requiring visual evaluation, cognitive processing, and decision-making. At each stage of this process, there are opportunities for error due to human factors including perceptual and ergonomic conditions. Investigation into the root causes of interpretive error in radiology first began over a century ago. In more recent work, there has been increasing recognition of the limits of human image perception and other human factors and greater acknowledgement of the role of the radiologist's environment in increasing the risk of error. This article reviews the state of research on perceptual and interpretive error in radiology. This article focuses on avenues for further error examination, and strategies for mitigating these errors are discussed. The relationship between artificial intelligence and interpretive error is also considered.",
keywords = "ergonomics, interpretation, medical imaging, perception, radiology",
author = "Degnan, {Andrew J.} and Ghobadi, {Emily H.} and Peter Hardy and Krupinski, {Elizabeth A} and Scali, {Elena P.} and Lindsay Stratchko and Adam Ulano and Eric Walker and Wasnik, {Ashish P.} and Auffermann, {William F.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acra.2018.11.006",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptual and Interpretive Error in Diagnostic Radiology—Causes and Potential Solutions

AU - Degnan, Andrew J.

AU - Ghobadi, Emily H.

AU - Hardy, Peter

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

AU - Scali, Elena P.

AU - Stratchko, Lindsay

AU - Ulano, Adam

AU - Walker, Eric

AU - Wasnik, Ashish P.

AU - Auffermann, William F.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Interpretation of increasingly complex imaging studies involves multiple intricate tasks requiring visual evaluation, cognitive processing, and decision-making. At each stage of this process, there are opportunities for error due to human factors including perceptual and ergonomic conditions. Investigation into the root causes of interpretive error in radiology first began over a century ago. In more recent work, there has been increasing recognition of the limits of human image perception and other human factors and greater acknowledgement of the role of the radiologist's environment in increasing the risk of error. This article reviews the state of research on perceptual and interpretive error in radiology. This article focuses on avenues for further error examination, and strategies for mitigating these errors are discussed. The relationship between artificial intelligence and interpretive error is also considered.

AB - Interpretation of increasingly complex imaging studies involves multiple intricate tasks requiring visual evaluation, cognitive processing, and decision-making. At each stage of this process, there are opportunities for error due to human factors including perceptual and ergonomic conditions. Investigation into the root causes of interpretive error in radiology first began over a century ago. In more recent work, there has been increasing recognition of the limits of human image perception and other human factors and greater acknowledgement of the role of the radiologist's environment in increasing the risk of error. This article reviews the state of research on perceptual and interpretive error in radiology. This article focuses on avenues for further error examination, and strategies for mitigating these errors are discussed. The relationship between artificial intelligence and interpretive error is also considered.

KW - ergonomics

KW - interpretation

KW - medical imaging

KW - perception

KW - radiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058409894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058409894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2018.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2018.11.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 30559033

AN - SCOPUS:85058409894

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

ER -