Perceptual skill, radiology expertise, and visual test performance with NINA and WALDO

C. F. Nodine, Elizabeth A Krupinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rational and Objectives. The goal of this study was to determine if radiologists possess superior visual search and analysis skills compared with those of laypeople. Materials and Methods. In two experiments, radiologists and laypeople searched one of two complex pictorial scenes for hidden targets. Eye position was recorded during the search. Two measures of performance were obtained: accuracy of detecting targets as measured by using alternative free response receiver operating characteristic analysis and visual search efficiency as measured by using eye position analysis. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in detection performance between radiologists and laypeople for either of the search tasks. Radiologists took longer on average to search the images and to first fixate on the targets than did the laypeople. For both groups, true-positive and false-positive decisions were associated with longer dwell times than true- negative decisions. As with radiology search tasks, false-negative decisions were also associated with longer dwell times than true-negative decisions. Conclusions. Performance on two visual search and detection tasks indicate that radiologists do not possess superior visual skills compared with laypeople. Radiology expertise is more likely to be a combination of specific visual and cognitive skills derived from medical training and experience in detecting and determining the diagnostic importance of radiographic findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)603-612
Number of pages10
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume5
Issue number9
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiology
ROC Curve
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Diagnostic radiology
  • Observer perfomance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Perceptual skill, radiology expertise, and visual test performance with NINA and WALDO. / Nodine, C. F.; Krupinski, Elizabeth A.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 5, No. 9, 1998, p. 603-612.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{06bc417b04344a348c1ccc1193a0bb1b,
title = "Perceptual skill, radiology expertise, and visual test performance with NINA and WALDO",
abstract = "Rational and Objectives. The goal of this study was to determine if radiologists possess superior visual search and analysis skills compared with those of laypeople. Materials and Methods. In two experiments, radiologists and laypeople searched one of two complex pictorial scenes for hidden targets. Eye position was recorded during the search. Two measures of performance were obtained: accuracy of detecting targets as measured by using alternative free response receiver operating characteristic analysis and visual search efficiency as measured by using eye position analysis. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in detection performance between radiologists and laypeople for either of the search tasks. Radiologists took longer on average to search the images and to first fixate on the targets than did the laypeople. For both groups, true-positive and false-positive decisions were associated with longer dwell times than true- negative decisions. As with radiology search tasks, false-negative decisions were also associated with longer dwell times than true-negative decisions. Conclusions. Performance on two visual search and detection tasks indicate that radiologists do not possess superior visual skills compared with laypeople. Radiology expertise is more likely to be a combination of specific visual and cognitive skills derived from medical training and experience in detecting and determining the diagnostic importance of radiographic findings.",
keywords = "Diagnostic radiology, Observer perfomance",
author = "Nodine, {C. F.} and Krupinski, {Elizabeth A}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "603--612",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptual skill, radiology expertise, and visual test performance with NINA and WALDO

AU - Nodine, C. F.

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Rational and Objectives. The goal of this study was to determine if radiologists possess superior visual search and analysis skills compared with those of laypeople. Materials and Methods. In two experiments, radiologists and laypeople searched one of two complex pictorial scenes for hidden targets. Eye position was recorded during the search. Two measures of performance were obtained: accuracy of detecting targets as measured by using alternative free response receiver operating characteristic analysis and visual search efficiency as measured by using eye position analysis. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in detection performance between radiologists and laypeople for either of the search tasks. Radiologists took longer on average to search the images and to first fixate on the targets than did the laypeople. For both groups, true-positive and false-positive decisions were associated with longer dwell times than true- negative decisions. As with radiology search tasks, false-negative decisions were also associated with longer dwell times than true-negative decisions. Conclusions. Performance on two visual search and detection tasks indicate that radiologists do not possess superior visual skills compared with laypeople. Radiology expertise is more likely to be a combination of specific visual and cognitive skills derived from medical training and experience in detecting and determining the diagnostic importance of radiographic findings.

AB - Rational and Objectives. The goal of this study was to determine if radiologists possess superior visual search and analysis skills compared with those of laypeople. Materials and Methods. In two experiments, radiologists and laypeople searched one of two complex pictorial scenes for hidden targets. Eye position was recorded during the search. Two measures of performance were obtained: accuracy of detecting targets as measured by using alternative free response receiver operating characteristic analysis and visual search efficiency as measured by using eye position analysis. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in detection performance between radiologists and laypeople for either of the search tasks. Radiologists took longer on average to search the images and to first fixate on the targets than did the laypeople. For both groups, true-positive and false-positive decisions were associated with longer dwell times than true- negative decisions. As with radiology search tasks, false-negative decisions were also associated with longer dwell times than true-negative decisions. Conclusions. Performance on two visual search and detection tasks indicate that radiologists do not possess superior visual skills compared with laypeople. Radiology expertise is more likely to be a combination of specific visual and cognitive skills derived from medical training and experience in detecting and determining the diagnostic importance of radiographic findings.

KW - Diagnostic radiology

KW - Observer perfomance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031752038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031752038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9750889

AN - SCOPUS:0031752038

VL - 5

SP - 603

EP - 612

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 9

ER -