Perfectionism and paternalism

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This entry considers the complex relationship between perfectionist politics and state paternalism. It discusses four main claims. These are that perfectionism in politics does not entail state paternalism, that a subset of state paternalistic policies has a perfectionist rationale, that perfectionist justice can require state paternalism, and that perfectionist state paternalism need not contravene a plausible principle of respect for persons. In discussing these four claims, the entry emphasizes that not all state paternalism is perfectionist, but that there is a type of state paternalism that has a distinctively perfectionist rationale. It critically analyzes a range of considerations that speak in favor of, and against, this type of distinctively perfectionist state paternalism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages170-181
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9781317326991
ISBN (Print)9781138956100
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Perfectionism
Paternalism
State Policy
Respect for Persons
Justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Wall, S. P. (2018). Perfectionism and paternalism. In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism (pp. 170-181). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657080

Perfectionism and paternalism. / Wall, Steven P.

The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism. Taylor and Francis, 2018. p. 170-181.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Wall, SP 2018, Perfectionism and paternalism. in The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism. Taylor and Francis, pp. 170-181. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657080
Wall SP. Perfectionism and paternalism. In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism. Taylor and Francis. 2018. p. 170-181 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657080
Wall, Steven P. / Perfectionism and paternalism. The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism. Taylor and Francis, 2018. pp. 170-181
@inbook{730c1cac606a4178b20cea0d6a95d4dd,
title = "Perfectionism and paternalism",
abstract = "This entry considers the complex relationship between perfectionist politics and state paternalism. It discusses four main claims. These are that perfectionism in politics does not entail state paternalism, that a subset of state paternalistic policies has a perfectionist rationale, that perfectionist justice can require state paternalism, and that perfectionist state paternalism need not contravene a plausible principle of respect for persons. In discussing these four claims, the entry emphasizes that not all state paternalism is perfectionist, but that there is a type of state paternalism that has a distinctively perfectionist rationale. It critically analyzes a range of considerations that speak in favor of, and against, this type of distinctively perfectionist state paternalism.",
author = "Wall, {Steven P}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315657080",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138956100",
pages = "170--181",
booktitle = "The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Perfectionism and paternalism

AU - Wall, Steven P

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This entry considers the complex relationship between perfectionist politics and state paternalism. It discusses four main claims. These are that perfectionism in politics does not entail state paternalism, that a subset of state paternalistic policies has a perfectionist rationale, that perfectionist justice can require state paternalism, and that perfectionist state paternalism need not contravene a plausible principle of respect for persons. In discussing these four claims, the entry emphasizes that not all state paternalism is perfectionist, but that there is a type of state paternalism that has a distinctively perfectionist rationale. It critically analyzes a range of considerations that speak in favor of, and against, this type of distinctively perfectionist state paternalism.

AB - This entry considers the complex relationship between perfectionist politics and state paternalism. It discusses four main claims. These are that perfectionism in politics does not entail state paternalism, that a subset of state paternalistic policies has a perfectionist rationale, that perfectionist justice can require state paternalism, and that perfectionist state paternalism need not contravene a plausible principle of respect for persons. In discussing these four claims, the entry emphasizes that not all state paternalism is perfectionist, but that there is a type of state paternalism that has a distinctively perfectionist rationale. It critically analyzes a range of considerations that speak in favor of, and against, this type of distinctively perfectionist state paternalism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044888152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044888152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315657080

DO - 10.4324/9781315657080

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85044888152

SN - 9781138956100

SP - 170

EP - 181

BT - The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -