Performance evaluation of a modular gamma camera using a detectability index

John D. Sain, Harrison H Barrett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The performance of a modular gamma camera for the task of detecting signals in random noisy backgrounds was evaluated experimentally. The results were compared with a theoretical computer simulation. Methods: The camera uses a 10 × 10 cm thallium-doped sodium iodide crystal, a 2 × 2 array of 53 × 53 mm photomultiplier tubes, and a parallel-hole collimator (1.5-mm bore width, 23.6-mm bore length). The camera was positioned to look down into a 10-cm-deep water bath that filled its field of view (FOV). The top surface of the water was 5 cm from the front face of the camera. The camera has 3-mm intrinsic spatial resolution (SR) in the center of its FOV and 9-mm system SR for objects 5 cm below the top surface of the water. Uniform and nonuniform random background data were collected by imaging the bath containing 740 MBq (20 mCi) 99mTc. Nonuniformities were created by placing water-filled objects in the bath. Each signal dataset was collected by imaging a water-filled plastic sphere, injected with 99mTc and set at a specific depth (Z) in the bath. Data were collected for many signal diameters (D) (4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 28 mm) at 1 depth (5 cm) and for 1 signal diameter (10 mm) at several depths (1, 3, 5, 7, 9 cm). Sets of signal-present/signal-absent image pairs (380 pairs, 105 events per image) for known contrasts (C) were generated for use in ideal-observer studies in which the detectability (d′) was calculated. Contrast-detail (log C vs. log D) plots were created. The theoretical simulation, developed for uniform backgrounds, provided data for comparison. Results: The detectability increased linearly with C and decreased nonlinearly with decreasing D or increasing Z. The C required to achieve a specific d′ increased sharply for D < SR. For C = 5, D = 10 mm, and d′ = 1.2, the camera consistently detected signals for Z < 6 cm. Similar results were found for nonuniform backgrounds. The theoretical simulation verified the results for uniform backgrounds. Conclusion: The methodology presented here provides a way of evaluating gamma cameras on the basis of signal-detection performance for specified lesions, with particular application to scintimammography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-66
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume44
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gamma Cameras
Baths
Water
Computer Simulation
Plastics

Keywords

  • Detectability
  • Gamma camera
  • Signal detection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Performance evaluation of a modular gamma camera using a detectability index. / Sain, John D.; Barrett, Harrison H.

In: Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 58-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{74743cdbe47d434eb7edb96f6b35710b,
title = "Performance evaluation of a modular gamma camera using a detectability index",
abstract = "The performance of a modular gamma camera for the task of detecting signals in random noisy backgrounds was evaluated experimentally. The results were compared with a theoretical computer simulation. Methods: The camera uses a 10 × 10 cm thallium-doped sodium iodide crystal, a 2 × 2 array of 53 × 53 mm photomultiplier tubes, and a parallel-hole collimator (1.5-mm bore width, 23.6-mm bore length). The camera was positioned to look down into a 10-cm-deep water bath that filled its field of view (FOV). The top surface of the water was 5 cm from the front face of the camera. The camera has 3-mm intrinsic spatial resolution (SR) in the center of its FOV and 9-mm system SR for objects 5 cm below the top surface of the water. Uniform and nonuniform random background data were collected by imaging the bath containing 740 MBq (20 mCi) 99mTc. Nonuniformities were created by placing water-filled objects in the bath. Each signal dataset was collected by imaging a water-filled plastic sphere, injected with 99mTc and set at a specific depth (Z) in the bath. Data were collected for many signal diameters (D) (4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 28 mm) at 1 depth (5 cm) and for 1 signal diameter (10 mm) at several depths (1, 3, 5, 7, 9 cm). Sets of signal-present/signal-absent image pairs (380 pairs, 105 events per image) for known contrasts (C) were generated for use in ideal-observer studies in which the detectability (d′) was calculated. Contrast-detail (log C vs. log D) plots were created. The theoretical simulation, developed for uniform backgrounds, provided data for comparison. Results: The detectability increased linearly with C and decreased nonlinearly with decreasing D or increasing Z. The C required to achieve a specific d′ increased sharply for D < SR. For C = 5, D = 10 mm, and d′ = 1.2, the camera consistently detected signals for Z < 6 cm. Similar results were found for nonuniform backgrounds. The theoretical simulation verified the results for uniform backgrounds. Conclusion: The methodology presented here provides a way of evaluating gamma cameras on the basis of signal-detection performance for specified lesions, with particular application to scintimammography.",
keywords = "Detectability, Gamma camera, Signal detection",
author = "Sain, {John D.} and Barrett, {Harrison H}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "58--66",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Medicine",
issn = "0161-5505",
publisher = "Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance evaluation of a modular gamma camera using a detectability index

AU - Sain, John D.

AU - Barrett, Harrison H

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - The performance of a modular gamma camera for the task of detecting signals in random noisy backgrounds was evaluated experimentally. The results were compared with a theoretical computer simulation. Methods: The camera uses a 10 × 10 cm thallium-doped sodium iodide crystal, a 2 × 2 array of 53 × 53 mm photomultiplier tubes, and a parallel-hole collimator (1.5-mm bore width, 23.6-mm bore length). The camera was positioned to look down into a 10-cm-deep water bath that filled its field of view (FOV). The top surface of the water was 5 cm from the front face of the camera. The camera has 3-mm intrinsic spatial resolution (SR) in the center of its FOV and 9-mm system SR for objects 5 cm below the top surface of the water. Uniform and nonuniform random background data were collected by imaging the bath containing 740 MBq (20 mCi) 99mTc. Nonuniformities were created by placing water-filled objects in the bath. Each signal dataset was collected by imaging a water-filled plastic sphere, injected with 99mTc and set at a specific depth (Z) in the bath. Data were collected for many signal diameters (D) (4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 28 mm) at 1 depth (5 cm) and for 1 signal diameter (10 mm) at several depths (1, 3, 5, 7, 9 cm). Sets of signal-present/signal-absent image pairs (380 pairs, 105 events per image) for known contrasts (C) were generated for use in ideal-observer studies in which the detectability (d′) was calculated. Contrast-detail (log C vs. log D) plots were created. The theoretical simulation, developed for uniform backgrounds, provided data for comparison. Results: The detectability increased linearly with C and decreased nonlinearly with decreasing D or increasing Z. The C required to achieve a specific d′ increased sharply for D < SR. For C = 5, D = 10 mm, and d′ = 1.2, the camera consistently detected signals for Z < 6 cm. Similar results were found for nonuniform backgrounds. The theoretical simulation verified the results for uniform backgrounds. Conclusion: The methodology presented here provides a way of evaluating gamma cameras on the basis of signal-detection performance for specified lesions, with particular application to scintimammography.

AB - The performance of a modular gamma camera for the task of detecting signals in random noisy backgrounds was evaluated experimentally. The results were compared with a theoretical computer simulation. Methods: The camera uses a 10 × 10 cm thallium-doped sodium iodide crystal, a 2 × 2 array of 53 × 53 mm photomultiplier tubes, and a parallel-hole collimator (1.5-mm bore width, 23.6-mm bore length). The camera was positioned to look down into a 10-cm-deep water bath that filled its field of view (FOV). The top surface of the water was 5 cm from the front face of the camera. The camera has 3-mm intrinsic spatial resolution (SR) in the center of its FOV and 9-mm system SR for objects 5 cm below the top surface of the water. Uniform and nonuniform random background data were collected by imaging the bath containing 740 MBq (20 mCi) 99mTc. Nonuniformities were created by placing water-filled objects in the bath. Each signal dataset was collected by imaging a water-filled plastic sphere, injected with 99mTc and set at a specific depth (Z) in the bath. Data were collected for many signal diameters (D) (4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 28 mm) at 1 depth (5 cm) and for 1 signal diameter (10 mm) at several depths (1, 3, 5, 7, 9 cm). Sets of signal-present/signal-absent image pairs (380 pairs, 105 events per image) for known contrasts (C) were generated for use in ideal-observer studies in which the detectability (d′) was calculated. Contrast-detail (log C vs. log D) plots were created. The theoretical simulation, developed for uniform backgrounds, provided data for comparison. Results: The detectability increased linearly with C and decreased nonlinearly with decreasing D or increasing Z. The C required to achieve a specific d′ increased sharply for D < SR. For C = 5, D = 10 mm, and d′ = 1.2, the camera consistently detected signals for Z < 6 cm. Similar results were found for nonuniform backgrounds. The theoretical simulation verified the results for uniform backgrounds. Conclusion: The methodology presented here provides a way of evaluating gamma cameras on the basis of signal-detection performance for specified lesions, with particular application to scintimammography.

KW - Detectability

KW - Gamma camera

KW - Signal detection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037228436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037228436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 58

EP - 66

JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

SN - 0161-5505

IS - 1

ER -