Performance Indicators in Spine Surgery

Godefroy Hardy St-Pierre, Michael H. Yang, Jonathan Bourget-Murray, Ken C. Thomas, Robin John Hurlbert, Nikolas Matthes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design. Systematic review. Objective. To elucidate how performance indicators are currently used in spine surgery. Summary of Background Data. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has given significant traction to the idea that healthcare must provide value to the patient through the introduction of hospital value-based purchasing. The key to implementing this new paradigm is to measure this value notably through performance indicators. Methods. MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for studies reporting the use of performance indicators specific to spine surgery. We followed the Prisma-P methodology for a systematic review for entries from January 1980 to July 2016. All full text articles were then reviewed to identify any measure of performance published within the article. This measure was then examined as per the three criteria of established standard, exclusion/risk adjustment, and benchmarking to determine if it constituted a performance indicator. Results. The initial search yielded 85 results among which two relevant studies were identified. The extended search gave a total of 865 citations across databases among which 15 new articles were identified. The grey literature search provided five additional reports which in turn led to six additional articles. A total of 27 full text articles and reports were retrieved and reviewed. We were unable to identify performance indicators. The articles presenting a measure of performance were organized based on how many criteria they lacked. We further examined the next steps to be taken to craft the first performance indicator in spine surgery. Conclusion. The science of performance measurement applied to spine surgery is still in its infancy. Current outcome metrics used in clinical settings require refinement to become performance indicators. Current registry work is providing the necessary foundation, but requires benchmarking to truly measure performance. Level of Evidence: 1

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-280
Number of pages6
JournalSpine
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2018

Keywords

  • performance indicators
  • performance spine surgery
  • performance standards
  • quality indicators
  • quality of care
  • spine surgery
  • systematic review
  • value in spine surgery
  • value-based healthcare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Performance Indicators in Spine Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    St-Pierre, G. H., Yang, M. H., Bourget-Murray, J., Thomas, K. C., Hurlbert, R. J., & Matthes, N. (2018). Performance Indicators in Spine Surgery. Spine, 43(4), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002309