Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates

Steven Z Rapcsak, Pelagie M Beeson, Maya L. Henry, Anne Leyden, Esther Kim, Kindle Rising, Sarah Andersen, HyeSuk Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion-deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)575-591
Number of pages17
JournalCortex
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Agraphia
Dyslexia
Reading
Language
Articulation Disorders
Language Disorders
Aptitude
Task Performance and Analysis

Keywords

  • Perisylvian cortex
  • Phonological deficit
  • Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia : Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates. / Rapcsak, Steven Z; Beeson, Pelagie M; Henry, Maya L.; Leyden, Anne; Kim, Esther; Rising, Kindle; Andersen, Sarah; Cho, HyeSuk.

In: Cortex, Vol. 45, No. 5, 05.2009, p. 575-591.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rapcsak, SZ, Beeson, PM, Henry, ML, Leyden, A, Kim, E, Rising, K, Andersen, S & Cho, H 2009, 'Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates', Cortex, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 575-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006
Rapcsak, Steven Z ; Beeson, Pelagie M ; Henry, Maya L. ; Leyden, Anne ; Kim, Esther ; Rising, Kindle ; Andersen, Sarah ; Cho, HyeSuk. / Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia : Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates. In: Cortex. 2009 ; Vol. 45, No. 5. pp. 575-591.
@article{63170057ba964f7988d00233cb2411c6,
title = "Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates",
abstract = "To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion-deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.",
keywords = "Perisylvian cortex, Phonological deficit, Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia",
author = "Rapcsak, {Steven Z} and Beeson, {Pelagie M} and Henry, {Maya L.} and Anne Leyden and Esther Kim and Kindle Rising and Sarah Andersen and HyeSuk Cho",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "575--591",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Masson SpA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia

T2 - Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates

AU - Rapcsak, Steven Z

AU - Beeson, Pelagie M

AU - Henry, Maya L.

AU - Leyden, Anne

AU - Kim, Esther

AU - Rising, Kindle

AU - Andersen, Sarah

AU - Cho, HyeSuk

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion-deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.

AB - To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion-deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.

KW - Perisylvian cortex

KW - Phonological deficit

KW - Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62349132676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62349132676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 18625494

AN - SCOPUS:62349132676

VL - 45

SP - 575

EP - 591

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

IS - 5

ER -